Transitive dependencies in transaction closures

Proceedings - IDEAS 1998: International Database Engineering and Applications Symposium

Volumn , Issue , 1998, Pages 34-43

  Schwarz, K ^a   Turker, C ^a   Saake, G ^a  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

object visibility constraints; termination dependencies; transaction closure; transaction compensation; transitive dependencies

Indexed keywords

SEMANTICS;

ADVANCED TRANSACTION; TERMINATION DEPENDENCIES; TRADITIONAL APPROACHES; TRANSACTION CLOSURE; TRANSACTION STRUCTURE; TRANSITIVE DEPENDENCIES; TRANSITIVITY PROPERTIES; VISIBILITY CONSTRAINT;

DATABASE SYSTEMS;

EID: 84958956212     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IDEAS.1998.694350     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. P. C. Attie, M. Singh, A. Sheth, M. Rusinkiewicz. Specifying and Enforcing Intertask Dependencies. In S. Baker, R. Agrawal, D. Bell, eds., Proc. 19th InTh. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 134-145, Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
2. A. P. Buchmann. Active Object Systems. In A. Dogac, M. TH. Ö zsu, A. Biliris, TH. Sellis, eds., Advances in Object-Oriented Database Systems, pp. 201-224, Springer, 1994.
3. P. K. Chrysanthis and K. Ramamritham. A Formalism for Extended Transaction Models. In G. M. Lohmann, A. Sernadas, R. Camps, eds., Proc. 17th InTh. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 103-112, Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.
4. P. K. Chrysanthis and K. Ramamritham. Synthesis of Extended Transaction Models Using ACTA. ACM Transaction on Database Systems, 19(3):450-491, September 1994.
5. U. Dayal, M. Hsu, R. Ladin. A Transaction Model for Long-Running Activities. In G. M. Lohmann, A. Sernadas, R. Camps, eds., Proc. 17th InTh. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 113-122, Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.
6. A. K. Elmagarmid, Y. Leu, W. Litwin, M. Rusinkiewicz. A Multidatabase Transaction Model for InterBase. In D. McLeod, R. Sacks-Davis, H.-J. Schek, eds., Proc. 16th InTh. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 507-518, Morgan Kaufmann, 1990.
7. D. Georgakopoulos, M. Hornick, P. Krychniak. An Environment for the Specification and Management of Extended Transactions in DOMS. In H.-J. Schek, A. P. Sheth, B. D. Czejdo, eds., Proc. 3rd InTh. Workshop on Research Issues in Data Engineering: Interoperability in Multidatabase Systems, pp. 253-257, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1993.
8. D. Georgakopoulos, M. Hornick, A. SheTh. An Overview ofWorkflowManagement: From ProcessModeling toWorkflow Automation Infrastructure. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 3(2):119-153, April 1995.
9. A. Geppert and K. R. Dittrich. Rule-Based Implementation of Transaction Model Specifications. In N. W. Paton and M. H. Williams, eds., Rules in Database Systems, Proc. 1st InTh. Workshop, pp. 127-142, Springer, 1994.
10. M. Hsu, R. Ladin, D. R. McCarthy. An ExecutionModel For Active Data Base Management Systems. In C. Beeri, J. W. Schmidt, U. Dayal, eds., Proc. 3rd InTh. Conf. on Data and Knowledge Bases: Improving Usability and Responsiveness, pp. 171-179, Morgan Kaufmann, 1988.
11. M. U. Kamath and K. Ramamritham. Correctness Issues in Workflow ManagemenTh. Distributed Systems Engineering, 3(4), December 1996.
12. J. E. B.Moss. Nested Transactions: An Approach to Reliable Distributed Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1985.
13. K. Schwarz, C. Türker, G. Saake. Analyzing and Formalizing Dependencies in Generalized Transaction Structures. In Proc. of the InTh. Workshop on Issues and Applications of Database Technology (IADT'98), July 6-9, 1998, Berlin, Germany, 1998. To appear.
14. K. Schwarz, C. Türker, G. Saake. Derived Transaction Termination Dependencies: An Algorithm for Computing Transitivity Rules. Preprint 7, Fakultät für Informatik, Universit ät Magdeburg, February 1998.
15. H.Wächter and A. Reuter. The ConTract Model. In A. K. Elmagarmid, ed., Database Transaction Models for Advanced Applications, pp. 219-263, Morgan Kaufmann, 1992.