A method for preserving statistical distributions subject to controlled tabular adjustment

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4302, Issue , 2006, Pages 1-11

  Cox, Lawrence H ^a   Orelien, Jean G ^b   Shah, Babubhai V ^b  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS   (United States)

^b SciMetrika   (United States)

Author keywords

Entropy; Iterative proportional fitting; Kolmogorov Smirnov test; Minimum discrimination information

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; ENTROPY; ITERATIVE METHODS; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING;

CONTROLLED TABULAR ADJUSTMENT; DISCRIMINATION INFORMATIONS; ITERATIVE PROPORTIONAL FITTING; KOLMOGOROV-SMIRNOV TEST; STATISTICAL ALGORITHM; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84958954199     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11930242_1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Cox, L.H.: Linear sensitivity measures in statistical disclosure control. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Volume 5 (1981) 153-164.
2. Cox, L.H. and Ernst, L.: Controlled rounding. INFOR, Volume 20 (1982) 423-432.
3. Cox, L.H., Fagan, J., Greenberg, B. and Hemmig, R.: Research at the Census Bureau into disclosure avoidance techniques for tabular data. In: Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association. Alexandria, VA (1986) 388-393.
4. Cox, L.H.: Suppression methodology and statistical disclosure control. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Volume 75 (1980) 377-385.
5. Cox, L.H.: Network models for complementary cell suppression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Volume 90 (1995) 1153-1162.
6. Fischetti, M. and Salazar-Gonzalez, J.J.: Models and algorithms for optimizing cell suppression in tabular data with linear constraints. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Volume 95 (2000) 916-928.
7. Cox, L.H. and Dandekar, R.A.: A new disclosure limitation method for tabular data that preserves data accuracy and ease of use. In: Proceedings of the 2002 FCSM Statistical Policy Seminar. U.S. Office of Management and Budget, Washington (2004) 15-30.
8. Cox L.H., Kelly J.P., and Patil R.: Balancing quality and confidentiality for multivariate tabular data. In: Domingo-Ferrer, J. and Torra, V. (eds.): Privacy in Statistical Data Bases, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 3050. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (2004) 87–98.
9. Kullback S and Leibler R.A.: On information and efficiency. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Volume 86 (1951) 79-86.
10. Hodges, J.L. Jr.: The significance probability of the Smirnov two-sample test. Arkiv for Matematik, Volume 3 (1957) 469-486.
11. Schmid F. and Trede M.: A distribution free test for the two sample problem for general alternatives. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, Volume 20 (1994) 409-419.
12. Shroer G and Trenkler D.: Exact and randomization distributions of Kolmogorov- Smirnov tests two or three samples. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, Volume 20 (1995) 185-202.
13. Buning H. : Robustness and power of modified Lepage, Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Cramer-Von Mises two sample tests. Journal of Applied Statistics, Volume 29 (2002) 907-924.
14. Pederson, S.P. and Johnson, M.E.: Estimating model discrepancy. Technometrics, Volume 32 (1990) 305-314.
15. McLaren C.E., Legler J.M. and Brittenahm G.M.: The generalized Chi-square goodnessof- fit test. The Statistician, Volume 43 (1994) 247-258.