Landslide consequence analysis: a region-scale indicator-based methodology

Landslides

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 843-858

  Puissant, A ^a   Van Den Eeckhaut, M ^b   Malet, J P ^a   Maquaire, O ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^b JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE CAEN   (France)

Author keywords

Damage index; Direct and indirect consequences; Landslide; Physical injury; Socio economic impacts; Structural and function impacts

Indexed keywords

DAMAGE DETECTION; ECONOMICS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HAZARDS; INSURANCE; LAND USE; LANDSLIDES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION;

DAMAGE INDEX; DIRECT AND INDIRECT CONSEQUENCES; PHYSICAL INJURIES; SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACTS; STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTION IMPACTS;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

EID: 84958922793     PISSN: 1612510X     EISSN: 16125118     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-013-0429-x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Akbas SO, Blahut J, Sterlacchini S (2009) Critical assessment of existing physical vulnerability functions for debris flows. In: Malet JP, Remaitre A, Boogard TA (Eds) Landslide processes: from geomorphological mapping to dynamic modelling: 229–233. CERG Editions, Strasbourg, 2009. ISBN 2-9518317-1-4
2. Alexander D (2004) Vulnerability to landslides. In: Glade T, Anderson M, Crozier MJ (eds) Landslide hazard and risk. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, Chichester, pp 175–198
3. Barbolini M, Cappabianca F, Sailer R (2004) Empirical estimate of vulnerability relations for use in snow avalanche risk assessment. In: Brebbia C (ed) Risk analysis IV: 533–542. WIT, Southampton
4. Birkmann J (2007) Risk and vulnerability indicators at different scales: applicability, usefulness and policy implications. Environ Hazards 7:20–31
5. Blong R (2003) A new damage index. Nat Hazard 30:1–23
6. Bonnard C, Forlati F, Scavia C (2004) Identification and mitigation of large landslide risks in Europe. Advances in risk assessment. Balkema, Leiden
7. BUWAL/BWW/BRP (1997) Berücksichtigung der Massenbewegungsgefahren bei raumwirksamen Tätigkeiten. Herausgegeber: Bundesamnt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft (BUWAL), Bundesamnt für Wasserwirtschaft (BWR), Bundesamnt für Raumplannung (BRP), Bern, 42p
8. Cascini L (2008) Applicability of landslide susceptibility and hazard zoning at different scales. Eng Geol 102(3–4):164–177
9. Catani F, Casagli N, Ermini L, Righini G, Menduni G (2005) Landslide hazard and risk mapping at catchment scale in the Arno River basin. Landslides 2(4):329–342
10. CENAT (2004) Glossary - Monte Verità Workshop: coping with risks due to natural hazards in the 21st century (2004) Online under http://www.cenat.ch/index.php?navID=824&userhash=41529&I=e
11. Del Gaudio V, Pierri P, Wasowski J (2003) An approach to time-probabilistic evaluation of seismically-induced landslide hazard. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93(2):557–569
12. Falemo S, Andersson-Sköld Y (2011) Landslide consequence analysis—mapping expected losses in the Göta river valley. In: Vogt, N., Schuppener, B., Straub, D & Bräu, G (eds): Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Geotechnical Risk and Safety (ISGSR), 2–3 June 2011, Munich, German Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute, BAW, 173–180
13. Fell R, Ho KKS, Lacasse S, Leroi E (2005) A framework for landslide risk assessment and management. In: Hungr O, Fell R, Couture R, Eberhardt E (eds) Landslide risk management: 533–541. Taylor & Francis, London
14. Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C, Cascini L, Leroi E, Savage WZ, on behalf of the JTC-1 Joint Technical Committee on Landslides and Engineered Slopes (2008) Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning. Engineering Geology 102:85–98
15. French SP, Lee D, Anderson K (2011) Estimating the social and economic consequences of natural hazards: fiscal impact example. Nat Hazards Rev 11(2):49–57
16. Fuchs S, Heiss K, Hübl J (2007) Towards an empirical vulnerability function for use in debris flow risk assessment. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 7:495–506
17. Fuchs S, Kuhlicke C, Meyer V (2011) Vulnerability to natural hazards—the challenge of integration. Nat Hazard 58(2):609–619
18. Galli M, Guzzetti F (2007) Landslide vulnerability criteria: a case study from Umbria, Central Italy. Environ Manag 40:649–664
19. Glade T (2003) Vulnerability assessment in landslide risk analysis. Erde 134:121–138
20. Glade T, Crozier M (2005) The nature of landslide hazard and impact. In: Glade T, Anderson M, Crozier M (eds) Landslide hazard and risk. Wiley, Chichester, pp 43–74
21. Guzzetti F, Galli M, Reichenbach P, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M (2005) Landslide hazard assessment in the Collazzone area, Umbria, Central Italy. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 6:115–131
22. Haugen ED, Kaynia AM (2008) Vulnerability of structures impacted by debris flow. In: Chen et al (eds) Landslides and Engineered Slopes. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 381–387
23. Hollenstein K (2005) Reconsidering the risk assessment concept: standardizing the impact description as a building block for vulnerability assessment. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5:301–307
24. Jaiswal P, van Westen CJ, Jetten V (2011) Quantitative assessment of landslide hazard along transportation lines using historical records. Landslides 8(3):279–291
25. Kappes MS, Malet JP, Remaître A, Horton P, Jaboyedoff M, Bell R (2011) Assessment of debris flow susceptibility at medium-scale in the Barcelonnette Basin, France. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 11:627–641
26. Kappes MS, Papathoma-Köhle M, Keiler M (2012) Assessing physical vulnerability for multi-hazards using an indicator-based methodology. Appl Geogr 32(2):577–590
27. Kaynia AM, Papathoma-Köhle M, Neuhäuser B, Ratzinger K, Wenzel H, Medina-Cetina Z (2008) Probabilistic assessment of vulnerability to landslide: application to the village of Lichtenstein, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. Eng Geol 101(1–2):33–48
28. Léone F, Asté JP, Leroi E (1996) Vulnerability assessment of elements exposed to mass movements: working toward a better risk perception, In: Senneset, K., Balkema (Eds.), Landslides, Rotterdam, 263–270
29. Leroi E (1996) Landslide hazard-risk maps at different scales: objectives, tools and developments. In: Senesset K (ed) Landslides, Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Landslides. Balkema, Rotterdam
30. Li Z, Nadim F, Huang H, Uzielli M, Lacasse S (2010) Quantitative vulnerability estimation for scenario-based landslide hazards. Landslides 7(2):125–134
31. Malet J-P, Laigle D, Remaître A, Maquaire O (2005) Triggering conditions and mobility of debris-flows associated to complex earthflows. Geomorphology 66(1–4):215–235
32. Malet JP, Thiery Y, Maquaire O, Puissant A (2006) Landslide susceptibility, vulnerability and risk assessment through GIS procedures: a tentative application in the South French Alps. Rev Int Géomatique Eur J GIS Spat Anal 16(3–4):499–525
33. Maquaire O, Weber C, Thiery Y, Puissant A, Malet JP, Wania A (2004) Current practices and assessment tools of landslide vulnerability in mountainous basins. Identification of exposed elements with a semi-automatic procedure. In: Lacerda W, Ehrlich M, Fontoura SAB, Sayao ASF (eds) Landslides evaluation and stabilization, Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Landslides. Balkema, Rotterdam
34. MATE/METL (1999) Plans de Prévention des Risques Naturels (PPR): Risques de Mouvements de Terrain. Ministère de l'Aménagement du Territoire et de l'Environnement, (MATE), Ministère de l'Equipement, des Transports et du Logement (METL). La Documentation Française, Paris
35. Mavrouli O, Corominas J (2010a) Vulnerability of simple reinforced concrete buildings in front of the rockfall impact. Landslides 7:169–180
36. Mavrouli O, Corominas J (2010b) Rockfall vulnerability assessment for reinforced concrete buildings. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 10(10):2055–2066
37. Papathoma-Köhle M, Neuhauser B, Ratzinger K, Wenzel H, Dominey Howes D (2007) Elements at risk as a framework for assessing the vulnerability of communities to landslides. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 7:765–779
38. Papathoma-Köhle M, Kappes M, Keiler M, Glade T (2011) Physical vulnerability assessment for Alpine hazards—state of the art and future needs. Nat Hazard 58:645–680
39. Petrascheck A, Kienholz H (2003) Hazard assessment and mapping of mountain risks in Switzerland. In: Rickenmann D, Chen CL (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction and Assessment. Millpress, Rotterdam
40. Petrucci O, Gullà G (2010) A simplified method for assessing landslide damage indices. Nat Hazard 52(3):539–560
41. Puissant A, Malet JP, Maquaire O (2006) Mapping landslide consequence in mountain areas: a tentative approach with a semi quantitative procedure. In: Weber C., Gancarski P. (Eds): SAGEO 2006, Proceedings International Conference on Spatial Analysis and Geomatics, Strasbourg, France, 16p (on CR-ROM)
42. Quan Luna B, Blahut J, van Westen CJ, Sterlacchini S, van Asch TWJ, Akbas SO (2011) The application of numerical debris flow modelling for the generation of physical vulnerability curves. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:2047–2060
43. Scheuer S, Haase D, Meyer V (2011) Exploring multicriteria flood vulnerability by integrating economic, social and ecological dimensions of flood risk and coping capacity: from a starting point view towards an end point view of vulnerability. Nat Hazard 58(2):751–771
44. Thiery Y, Malet JP, Sterlacchini S, Puissant A, Maquaire O (2007) Landslide susceptibility assessment by bivariate methods at large scales: application to a complex mountainous environment. Geomorphology 92(1–2):38–59
45. Thywissen K (2006) Core terminology of disaster reduction: a comparative glossary. In: Birkmann J (ed) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards—towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations University Press, Bonn, pp 48–58
46. Twigg J, Bhatt MR (1998) Understanding vulnerability: South Asian perspectives. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, 290 p
47. UNDRO (1984) Disaster prevention and mitigation—a compendium of current knowledge. Preparedness Aspects, 11
48. van Westen CJ, van Asch TWJ, Soeters R (2006) Landslide hazard and risk zonation—why is it still so difficult? Bull Eng Geol Environ 65(2):167–184
49. Vandine DF, Moore G, Wise M, Vanbuskirk C, Gerath R (2004) Technical terms and methods. In Wise M, Moore G, Vandine D (eds) Landslide risk case studies in forest development planning and operations. B.C., Ministry of Forests, Forest Science Program, abstract of land management Handbook 56, pp 13–26
50. Varnes DJ (1984) Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice. Unesco, Paris, pp 63–71
51. Zêzere JL, Garcia RAC, Oliveira SC, Reis E (2008) Probabilistic landslide risk analysis considering direct costs in the area north of Lisbon (Portugal). Geomorphology 94(3–4):467–495