From big data to deep insight in developmental science

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 112-126

  Gilmore, Rick O ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; FACTUAL DATABASE; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PROCEDURES;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DATA MINING; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION;

EID: 84958775463     PISSN: 19395078     EISSN: 19395086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1379     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Borgman C . Big Data, Little Data, No Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2015 Available at: https://mitpress.mit.edu/big-data.
2. Boyd D, Crawford K . Critical questions for big data. Infor Commun Soc 2012, 15:662-679. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.
3. Lohr, S . Big Data's Impact in the World. The New York Times, February, 2012. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/12/sunday-review/big-datas-impact-in-the-world.html.
4. Marcus, G. Steamrolled by big data. The New Yorker, March 13, 2013. Available art: http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/steamrolled-by-big-data.
5. McAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. Big data: the management revolution HBR, (October, 2012). Available at: https://hbr.org/2012/10/big-data-the-management-revolution/ar.
6. Press, G. A very short history of big data. Forbes, May 9, 2013. Available at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/gilpress/2013/05/09/a-very-short-history-of-big-data/
7. Anderson, C . The end of theory: the data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete, June2008. Available at: http://archive.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/16-07/pb_theory/. (Accessed December 31, 2015).
8. Laney, D. 3D data management: controlling data volume, velocity, and variety (Tech. Rep.). META Group, February 2001. Available at: http://blogs.gartner.com/doug-laney/files/2012/01/ad949-3D-Data-Management-Controlling-Data-Volume-Velocity-and-Variety.pdf.
9. IBM. [CT000], March 2015. Available at: http://www-01.ibm.com/software/au/data/bigdata/.
10. Elman JL, Bates EA, Johnson MH, Karmiloff-Smith A, Parisi D, Plunkett K . Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998.
11. Gottlieb G . Normally occurring environmental and behavioral influences on gene activity: from central dogma to probabilistic epigenesis. Psychol Rev 1998, 105:792-802. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.792-802.
12. Oyama S, Taylor P, Fogel A, Lickliter R, Sterelny PK, Smith KC, van der Weel C . The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2000.
13. Vygotsky LS . Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1980.
14. Rietveld CA, Conley D, Eriksson N, Esko T, Medland SE, Vinkhuyzen AAE, Yang J, Boardman JD, Chabris CF, Dawes CT, et al. Replicability and robustness of genome-wide-association studies for behavioral traits. Psychol Sci 2014, 25:1975-1986. doi:10.1177/0956797614545132.
15. Sweeney, L . (n.d). Identifiability. Available at: http://dataprivacylab.org/projects/identifiability/index.html.
16. Pearson H . Massive UK baby study cancelled. Nature 2015, 526:620-621. doi:10.1038/526620a.
17. Tamis-LeMonda, C. Language, cognitive, and socio-emotional skills across the first 6 years in U.S. children from African-American, Dominican, Mexican, and Chinese backgrounds. Databrary, 2013. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.17910/B7CC74
18. Bayley N . Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. New York, NY: Harcourt Assessment; 2006.
19. Rothbart MK . Measurement of temperament in infancy. Child Dev 1981, 52:569-578.
20. Goldsmith H, Rothbart M . The Laboratory Temperament Assessment Battery (Lab-Tab). University of Wisconsin; 1993.
21. Mayer DL, Beiser AS, Warner AF, Pratt EM, Raye KN, Lang JM . Monocular acuity norms for the Teller Acuity Cards between ages one month and four years. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995, 36:671-685.
22. Salomão SR, Ventura DF . Large sample population age norms for visual acuities obtained with Vistech-Teller Acuity Cards. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995, 36:657-670.
23. Teller DY, McDonald MA, Preston K, Sebris SL, Dobson V . Assessment of visual acuity in infants and children; the acuity card procedure. Dev Med Child Neurol 1986, 28:779-789.
24. Lewin, T . More students are taking both the ACT and SAT. The New York Times, August 2013. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/04/education/edlife/more-students-are-taking-both-the-act-and-sat.html
25. Lardinois, F . (n.d). Gmail now has 900M active users, 75% on mobile. Available at: http://social.techcrunch.com/2015/05/28/gmail-now-has-900m-active-users-75-on-mobile/.
26. Protalinski, E. Facebook passes 1.23 billion monthly active users, January 29, 2014. Available at: http://thenextweb.com/facebook/2014/01/29/facebook-passes-1-23-billion-monthly-active-users-945-million-mobile-users-757-million-daily-users/.
27. Meyer, R. Everything we know about Facebook's secret mood manipulation experiment. The Atlantic, June 2014. Available at: http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/06/everything-we-know-about-facebooks-secret-mood-manipulation-experiment/373648/.
28. Goodman A, Pepe A, Blocker AW, Borgman CL, Cranmer K, Crosas M, DiStefano R, Gil Y, Groth P, Hedstrom M, et al. Ten simple rules for the care and feeding of scientific data. PLoS Comput Biol 2014, 10:e1003542. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003542.
29. Lohr, S. For big-data scientists, 'Janitor work' is key hurdle to insights. The New York Times, August 2014. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/18/technology/for-big-data-scientists-hurdle-to-insights-is-janitor-work.html.
30. Eisenberg N . Thoughts on the Future of Data Sharing-Association for Psychological Science, June 2015. Available at: https://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/observer/2015/may-june-15/thoughts-on-the-future-of-data-sharing.html. (Accessed December 31, 2015).
31. The White House. Consumer data privacy in a networked world: a framework for protecting privacy and promoting innovation in the global digital economy. J Priv Confid 2012, 4:95-142. Available at: http://repository.cmu.edu/jpc/vol4/iss2/5.
32. Bhattacharjee, Y . Diederik Stapel's audacious academic fraud. The New York Times, April 2013. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/magazine/diederik-stapels-audacious-academic-fraud.html.
33. Singal, J. The case of the amazing gay-marriage data: how a graduate student reluctantly uncovered a huge scientific fraud, May 29, 2015. Available at: http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2015/05/how-a-grad-student-uncovered-a-huge-fraud.html.
34. Ioannidis JPA . Why most published research findings are false. Chance 2005, 18:40-47. doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754.
35. Nosek BA, Spies JR, Motyl M . Scientific Utopia II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspect Psychol Sci 2012, November, 7:615-631. Available at: http://pps.sagepub.com/content/7/6/615.
36. Collaboration OS . Estimating the reproducibility of psychological. Science 2015, 349:aac4716. Available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/349/6251/aac4716.
37. Rosenthal R . The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychol Bull 1979, 86:638-641.
38. Bishop, D . Novelty, interest and replicability, January 19, 2012. Available at: http://deevybee.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/novelty-interest-and-replicability.html.
39. Ascoli GA . The ups and downs of neuroscience shares. Neuroinformatics 2006, 4:213-215. doi:10.1385/NI%3A4%3A3%3A213.
40. Bishop, D . Publishing replication failures: some lessons from history, July 11, 2015. Available at: http://deevybee.blogspot.com/2015/07/publishing-replication-failures-some.html.
41. Nosek BA, Alter G, Banks GC, Borsboom D, Bowman SD, Breckler SJ, Buck S, Chambers CD, Chin G, Christensen G, et al. Promoting an open research culture. Science 2015, 348:1422-1425. Available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/348/6242/1422.
42. Maunsell J . Announcement regarding supplemental material. J Neurosci 2010, 30:10599-10600. Available from http://www.jneurosci.org/content/30/32/10599.
43. Group, A. D. S. W. Data Sharing: Principles and Considerations for Policy Development. American Psychological Association, June 2015. Available at: http://www.apa.org/science/leadership/bsa/data-sharing-report.aspx.
44. Data Ownership. (n.d.). Data Ownership. Office of Research Integrity, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: https://ori.hhs.gov/education/products/n_illinois_u/datamanagement/dotopic.html.
45. Fernald A . Getting beyond the 'convenience sample' in research on early cognitive development. Behav Brain Sci 2010, 33:91-92.
46. Karasik LB, Adolph KE, Tamis-LeMonda CS, Bornstein MH . Weird walking: cross-cultural research on motor development. Behav Brain Sci 2010, 33:95-96.
47. Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A . The weirdest people in the world? Behav Brain Sci 2010, 33:61-83; discussion 83-135.
48. Maxwell SE . The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: causes, consequences, and remedies. Psychol Methods 2004, 9:147-163.
49. Button KS, Ioannidis JPA, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ESJ, Munafo MR . Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013, 14:365-376. Available at: http://www.nature.com/nrn/journal/v14/n5/abs/nrn3475.html.
50. Graham, M . Big data and the end of theory? The Guardian, March 2012. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2012/mar/09/big-data-theory.