Improving the performance of OLAP queries using families of statistics trees

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2114, Issue , 2001, Pages 274-283

  Hammer, Joachim ^a   Fu, Lixin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATES; DATA WAREHOUSES; FORESTRY; QUERY PROCESSING; STATISTICS; WAREHOUSES;

AGGREGATE VIEWS; OLAP QUERIES; ONE-TIME; PROCESSING TIME; QUERY EVALUATION ALGORITHM;

TREES (MATHEMATICS);

EID: 84958764920     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44801-2_27     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Arbor Systems, “Large-Scale Data Warehousing Using Hyperion Essbase OLAP Technology,” Arbor Systems, White Paper, www.hyperion.com/whitepapers.cfm
2. S. Chaudhuri and U. Dayal, “An Overview of Data Warehousing and OLAP Technology,” SIGMOD Record, 26:1, pp. 65-74, 1997
3. L. Fu and J. Hammer, “CubiST: A New Algorithm for Improving the Performance of Adhoc OLAP Queries,” Proceedings of the ACM Third International Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP (DOLAP), Washington, DC, pp. 72-79, 2000
4. J. Gray, S. Chaudhuri, A. Bosworth, A. Layman, D. Reichart, M. Venkatrao, F. Pellow, and H. Pirahesh, “Data Cube: A Relational Aggregation Operator Generalizing Group-By, Cross-Tab, and Sub-Totals,” Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1:1, pp. 29-53, 1997
5. A. Gupta, V. Harinarayan, and D. Quass, “Aggregate-query Processing in Data Warehousing Environments,” Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Very Large Databases, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 358-369, 1995
6. H. Gupta and I. Mumick, “Selection of Views to Materialize Under a Maintenance Cost Constraint,” Stanford University, Technical Report
7. J. Hammer and L. Fu, “Speeding Up Data Cube Queries with Statistics Trees,” University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, Research report TR01-007, January 2001
8. W. Labio, D. Quass, and B. Adelberg, “Physical Database Design for Data Warehouses,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Database Engineering, Birmingham, England, pp. 277-288, 1997
9. M. Lee and J. Hammer, “Speeding Up Warehouse Physical Design Using A Randomized Algorithm,” Proceedings of the International Workshop on Design and Management of Data Warehouses (DMDW’99), Heidelberg, Germany, 1999
10. D. Lomet, ed. Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Data Engineering. Special Issue on Materialized Views and Data Warehousing, ed. J. Widom. 18, IEEE Computer Society, 1995
11. MicroStrategy Inc., “The Case For Relational OLAP,” MicroStrategy, White Paper, www.microstrategy.com/publications/whitepapers/Case4Rolap/
12. OLAP Council, “OLAP Overview and Definitions,” www.olapcouncil.org/
13. P. O'Neil and D. Quass, “Improved Query Performance with Variant Indexes,” SIGMOD Record, 26:2, pp. 38-49, 1997
14. Oracle Corp., “Oracle Express OLAP Technology,” www.oracle.com/olap/
15. Redbrick Systems, “Informix Redbrick Decision Server,” Redbrick, Los Gatos, CA, Product Overview and Data Sheet, www.informix.com/redbrick/
16. W. P. Yan and P. Larson, “Eager Aggregation and Lazy Aggregation,” Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Very Large Databases, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 345-357, 1995