AGILE interface for 'No-learning nor experience required' interaction

User Modeling and Adaptation for Daily Routines: Providing Assistance to People with Special Needs

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 119-151

  Martinez, Santiago ^a   Carrillo, Antonio L ^b   Scott Brown, Kenneth C ^a   Falgueras, Juan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERTAY DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMBEDDED SYSTEMS;

DEVICE OPERATIONS; HOLISTIC ANALYSIS; IMPROVE PERFORMANCE; INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGIES; INTERACTION STYLES; INTERFACE DESIGNS; INTERFACE ELEMENTS; TECHNOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT;

EDUCATION;

EID: 84958695592     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-4778-7_5     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. Americans with Disabilities (1990) Act of 1990 incorporating the changes made by the ADA Amendments Act of 2008. http://www.ada.gov/pubs/adastatute08.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2011
2. Aykin NM, Aykin T (1991) Individual differences in human-computer interaction. Comp Ind Eng 20(3):373-379. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0360-8352(91)90009-U
3. Brusilovsky P (2001) Adaptive hypermedia. User Model User-Adap Inter 11(1):87-110, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011143116306
4. Brusilovsky P, Milĺan E (2007) User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. In: Brusilovsky P, Kobsa A, Nejdl W (eds) The adaptive web, methods and strategies of web personalization. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4321. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 3-53
5. Card SK, Moran TP, Newell A (1983) The psychology of human-computer interaction. CRC, Boca Raton
6. Carroll JM, Thomas JC (1982) Metaphor and the cognitive representation of computing systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 12(2):107-116
7. Chisnell D (2007) Where technology meets green bananas. Interactions 14(2):10-11, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1229863.1229876
8. de Jesus Stoll MT, Wickham DP et al (2005) Use of conceptual diagrams to support relationships between launchpads and its wizards. US Patent 6,968,505
9. Fourney DW, Carter JA (2006) A standard method of profiling the accessibility needs of computer users with vision and hearing impairments. In: Hersh MA (ed) Proceedings of conference and workshop on assistive technologies for people with vision and hearing impairments. Technology for Inclusion CVHI, Kufstein
10. Fowler M, Highsmith J (2001) The AGILE manifesto. Softw Dev 9(8):28-35
11. Glinert EP, York BW (1992) Computers and people with disabilities. Commun ACM 35(5):32-35, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/129875.129876
12. Goldsmith S (1976) Design for the disabled. Royal Institute of British Architects, London
13. Hanson VL (2010) Influencing technology adoption by older adults. Interact Comput 22(6):502-509, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.09.001
14. Hargittai E (2010) Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the "Net Generation". Sociol Inquiry 80(1):92-113, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x
15. Hawthorn D (2000) Possible implications of aging for interface designers. Interact Comput 12(5):507-528, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(99)00021-1
16. Hewett TT (1986) The role of iterative evaluation in designing systems for usability. In:Harrison MD, Monk AF (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd conference of the British Computer Society, human computer interaction specialist group on people and computers: designing for usability. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 196-214
17. Hix D, Hartson H (1993) Developing user interfaces: ensuring usability through product and process. John Wiley & Sons, New York
18. Hutchins EL, Hollan JD, Norman DA (1986) Direct manipulation interfaces. In: Norman DA, Draper SW (eds) User-centered system design. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 87-124
19. Hypponen H (2001) Industry awareness and transfer in Europe and the USA. In: Roe PRW (ed) Bridging the gap? Access to telecommunications for all people. Commission of European Communities, Brussels
20. IKEA (2012) Kitchen planner. http://www.ikea.com/ms/en US/rooms ideas/splashplanners. html. Accessed 16 Dec 2012
21. ISO 9241-171 (2008) Ergonomics of human-system interaction - part 171: guidance on software accessibility. http://www.iso.org/iso/iso catalogue/catalogue tc/catalogue detail. htm?csnumber=39080. Accessed 1 April 2012
22. ISO 9241-210 (2010) Ergonomics of human-system interaction - part 210: human-centred design for interactive systems. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue detail.htm?csnumber=52075. Accessed 1 Aug 2011
23. Jacko JA, Vitense H (2001) A review and reappraisal of information technologies within a conceptual framework for individuals with disabilities. Universal Access Inform Soc 1(1):56-76
24. Jette AM (2006) Toward a common language for function, disability, and health. Phys Ther 86(5):726-734
25. John BE, Kieras DE (1996) The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques:comparison and contrast. ACM Transact Comput Hum Interact 3(4):320-351, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/235833.236054
26. Kinsella K, He W (2009) An aging world: 2008. US census bureau, international population 1017 reports, PS95/09-1. US Government Printing Office, Washington DC
27. Langdon P, Thimbleby H (2010) Inclusion and interaction: designing interaction for inclusive populations. Interact Comput 22(6):439-448, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.08.007
28. Langdon P, Persad U, John Clarkson P (2010) Developing a model of cognitive interaction for analytical inclusive design evaluation. Interact Comput 22(6):510-529, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.08.008
29. Ling R (2008) Exclusion or self-isolation? Texting and the elderly users. Inform Soc 24(5)
30. Madden R, Hogan T (1997) The definition of disability in Australia: moving towards national consistency. AIHW, Canberra
31. Marschollek M et al (2007) ICT-based health information services for elderly people: past experiences, current trends, and future strategies. Inform Health Soc Care 32(4):251-261, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14639230701692736
32. Martinez S, Sloan R, Szymkowiak A, Scott-Brown K (2010) Using virtual agents to cue observer attention: assessment of the impact of agent animation. In: The second international conference on creative content technologies. CONTENT, Lisbon, 21-26 Nov 2010, pp 7-12
33. Martinez S et al (2012) Animated virtual agents to cue user attention. Int J Adv Intell Sys 4(3&4):299-308
34. McDonough FA, Ladner RE, Roth W, Scadden LA and Vanderheiden GC (1988) Public law 99-506, "Section 508" Electronic equipment accessibility for disabled workers. In: O'Hare JJ (ed) Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI '88), ACM, New York, pp 219-222. doi:10.1145/57167.57204 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/57167.57204
35. Moran TP (1981) Guest editor's introduction: an applied psychology of the user. ACMComput Surv 13:1-11, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/356835.356836
36. Mori G, Patern'o F, Santoro C (2002) CTTE: support for developing and analyzing task models for interactive system design. IEEE Trans Soft Eng 28(8):797-813
37. Newell A (1993) Interfaces for the ordinary and beyond. IEEE Soft 10(5):76-78, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/52.232406
38. Newell AF (2006) Older people as a focus for inclusive design. Gerontechnology 4(4):190-199, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4017/gt.2006.04.04.003.00
39. Newell A, Simon HA et al (1972) Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
40. Newell AF (2008) Accessible computing-past trends and future suggestions: commentary on "computers and people with disabilities." ACM Trans Access Comput 1(2): Article 9
41. Nicolle C, Abascal J (2001) Inclusive design guidelines for HCI. In: Proceedings of INCLUDE 2001, London, 18-20 April
42. Nicolle C, Peters B (1999) Elderly and disabled travelers: intelligent trans. Systems designed for the 3rd millennium. Transp Hum Fact 1(2):121-134, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/sthf0102 1
43. Nielsen J (1993) Iterative user-interface design. Comp 26(11):32-41, Academic, San Diego, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/2.241424
44. Nielsen J (1993) Usability engineering. Academic Press, San Diego
45. Nielsen J (1995) Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington
46. Pieper M, Morasch H, Píela G (2003) Bridging the educational divide. Univ Acc Inf Soc 2(3):243-254, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10209-003-0061-y
47. Porrero IP (1998) Improving the quality of life for the European citizen: technology for inclusive design and equality. IOS Press, Amsterdam
48. Potosnak K et al (1986) Classifying users: a hard look at some controversial issues. ACM SIGCHI Bull 17(4):84-88, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/22339.22353
49. Pullin G, Newell AF (2007) Focussing on extra-ordinary users. In: Proceedings of HCiI 2007, coping with diversity, 4th international conference on universal access in human-computer interaction, UAHCI 2007, Beijing, China, 22-27 July 2007, Proceedings, part I lecture notes in computer science, vol 4554, Springer, ISBN:978 3 540 73278-5
50. Rensink RA et al (2010) To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psych Sci 8(5):368-373
51. Rogers Y, Sharp H, Preece J (2011) Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. Wiley, New Jersey
52. Savidis A, Stephanidis C (2004) Unified user interface design: designing universally accessible interactions. Interact Comp 16(2): 243-270. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S0953543804000025. Accessed 18 Nov 2011
53. Scott-Brown KC, Baker MR, Orbach HS (2000) Comparison blindness. Vis Cogn 7(1-3):253-267
54. Shneiderman B (1983) Direct manipulation: a step beyond programming languages. IEEE Comp 16(8):57-69, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MC.1983.1654471
55. Shneiderman B, Plaisant C (2005) Designing the user interface: strategies for effective humancomputer interaction, 4th edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston
56. Sloan RJS (2011) Emotional avatars: choreographing emotional facial expression animation. Dissertation, University of Abertay, Dundee
57. Sloan RJS, Martinez S, Scott-Brown K (2012) Using the principles of animation to predict allocation of attention. In: Predicting Perceptions 2012, Edinburgh, 17-19 April 2012
58. SensoMotric Instruments (2012) Eye & Gaze Tracking Systems. http://www.smivision.com/. Accessed 16 Dec 2012
59. SensoMotric Instruments (2012) SMI Eye Tracking Glasses. http://eyetracking-glasses.com/. Accessed 16 Dec 2012
60. Stevens JC (1992) Aging and spatial acuity of touch. J Gerontol 47(1):35-40
61. Stevens JC et al (1998) A multimodal assessment of sensory thresholds in aging. J Gerontol 53(4):263
62. Swiffin AL, Pickering JA, Arnott JL, Newell AF (1985) Pal: an effort efficient portable communication aid and keyboard emulator. In: Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on rehabilitation techonology, RESNA 8th Annual Conference, Memphis, Tennessee, pp 197-199
63. United States Department of Education Questions & Answers Title IV-Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998 section 508. Electronic and information technology. http://www.justice. gov/crt/508/archive/deptofed.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2011
64. Van Dam A (1997) Post-WIMP user interfaces. Commun ACM 40(2):63-67, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/253671.253708
65. Whiteside J, Bennett J, Holzblatt K (1988) Usability engineering: our experience and evolution. In: HelanderM(ed) Handbook of human-computer interaction. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 791-817
66. WHO (2001) ICF international classification of functioning, disability and health. World Health Organization, Geneva
67. Zajicek M (2006) Aspects of HCI research for older people. Univ Acc Inf Soc 5(3):279-286, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10209-006-0046-8
68. Ziegler J (1996) Interactive techniques. ACM Comput Surv 28(1):185-187. doi:10.1145/234313.234392 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/234313.234392