Guardianship, social citizenship and theorising substitute decision-making law

Springer 4

Volumn 9783642259722, Issue , 2012, Pages 1-17

  Carney, Terry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958694080     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-25972-2_1     Document Type: Chapter

References (64)

1. Access Economics (2003). The dementia epidemic: economic impact and positive solutions for Australia. Access Economics Pty, Canberra
2. Access Economics (2010). Caring places: planning for aged care and dementia 2010-2050. Access Economic Pty, Canberra, pp 1-117
3. Alberta (2007) Legislative Review of the Dependent Adults Act and the Personal Directives Act: Final Report and Recommendations. Calgary, Alberta, Government of Alberta, Legislative Review (Ms Cindy Ady, chair), pp 1-55
4. Alberta. (2009) Frequently Asked Questions: Adult Guardianship and Trusteeship Act. http://www.justice.gov.ab.ca/public-trustee/default.aspx. Accessed 15 Sept 2009
5. Andrews G, Tolkien II Team (2006) Tolkien II - a needs-based, costed stepped-care model for mental health services. World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Classification in Mental Health, Sydney
6. Beaupert F, Carney T, Tait D, Topp V (2008) Property management orders in the mental health context: protection or empowerment? New South Wales Law J 31(3):795-824
7. Beyer GW (2009) The Uniform Power of Attorney Act: New Solutions to Old Problems. Estate Planning Studies (April), pp 1-8
8. Blankman K (1997) Guardianship models in the Netherlands and Western Europe. Int J Law Psychiatry 20(1):47-57
9. Brayley J (2009) Decisions about supported accommodation: advocacy and supported decision-making vs substitute decision making. Rights, Responsibilities and Rhetoric: Unpacking policy and practice issues in mental health law, guardianship & trusteeship, Adelaide
10. Burningham S (2009) Developments in Canadian adult guardianship and co-decision making law. Dalhous J Leg Stud 18:119-156
11. Burns F (2002) Undue influence inter vivos and the elderly. Melbourne Univ Law Rev 26 (3):499-536
12. Burns F (2003) The elderly and undue influence inter vivos. Leg Stud 23(2):251-283
13. Butterwick SJ, Hommel PA, Keilitz II (2001) Evaluating mediation as a means of resolving adult guardianship cases. Center for Social Gerontology, Ann Arbor
14. Carney T (1982) Civil and social guardianship for intellectually handicapped people. Monash Univ Law Rev 8:199-232
15. Carney T (1989) The limits and the social legacy of guardianship. Federal Law Rev 18:231-266
16. Carney T (1995) Judging the competence of older people: an alternative? Ageing Soc 15:515-35
17. Carney T (1999) Abuse of enduring powers of attorney: lessons from the Australian tribunal experiment? New Zeal Univ Law Rev 18:481-508
18. Carney T (2003) Challenges to the Australian guardianship & administration model? Elder Law Rev 2:1-13 (electronic)
19. Carney T, Keyzer P (2007) Planning for the future: arrangements for the assistance of people planning for the future of people with impaired capacity. Queensland Univ Technol Law Justice J 7(2):255-278
20. Carney T, Singer P (1986) Ethical and legal issues in guardianship options for intellectually disadvantaged people. A.G.P.S., Canberra
21. Carney T, Tait D (1997) The adult guardianship experiment: tribunals and popular justice. Federation Press, Sydney
22. Creyke R (1993) Focusing on individual needs: developing the law's mechanisms for mentally disabled and elderly people. Int Soc Secur Rev 46:79-96
23. Dhanda A (2008) Constructing a new Human Rights Lexicon: convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. SUR Int J Hum Right 8, np
24. Dhanda A, Narayan T (2007) Mental health and human rights. Lancet 370(9594):1197-1198
25. US DoH&HServices (2007) Advance directives and advance care planning: legal and policy issues. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disability, Aging and Long-Term Care Policy, Washington
26. Donnelly M (2008) From autonomy to dignity: treatment for mental disorders and the focus for patient rights. Law in Context 26(2):37-61
27. Doron I (1999) From lunacy to incapacity and beyond-guardianship of the elderly and Ontario's experience in defining "legal incapacity". Health Law Can 19(4):95-114
28. Doron I (2002) Elder guardianship kaleidoscope: a comparative perspective. Int J Law Pol Fam 16(3):368-398
29. Doron I (2003) A multi-dimensional model of elder Law: an Israel example. Ageing Int 28 (3):242-259
30. Doron I (2006) Elder law: current issues and future horizons. Eur J Ageing 6(1):60-66
31. Dunn M, Clare C, Holland A (2010) Living 'A Life Like Ours': support workers' accounts of substitute decision-making in residential care homes for adults with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res 54(2):144-160
32. Fisher KR, Gleeson R, Edwards R, Purcal C, et al (2010) Effectiveness of individual funding approaches for disability support. Occasional Paper No 29. Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, Canberra, 29: i-viii, 1-113
33. Goodman R, Peng I (1996) The East Asian Welfare States: peripatetic learning, adaptive change, and nation-building. In: Esping-Andersen G (ed) Welfare states in transition. Sage, London, pp 192-224
34. Hancock L (2002) The care crunch: changing work, families and welfare in Australia. Crit Soc Pol 22(1):119-140
35. Howe A (1997) The aged care reform strategy: a decade of changing momentum and margins for reform. In: Borowski A, Encel S, Ozanne E (eds) Ageing and social policy in Australia. CUP, Sydney, pp 301-326
36. Kämpf A (2008) The disabilities convention and its consequences for mental health laws in Australia. Law in Context 26(2):10-36
37. Kapp M (1996) Aging and the law. In: Binstock R, George L (eds) Handbook of aging and the social sciences, Academic Press, San Diego, pp 467-479
38. Kim S, Hahm K-H, Park HW, Kang HH et al (2010) A Korean perspective on developing a global policy for advance directives. Bioethics 24(3):113-117
39. Kohn NA (2006) Elder empowerment as a strategy for curbing the hidden abuses of durable powers of attorney. Rutgers Law Rev 59(1):1-53
40. Kohn NA (2009) Outliving civil rights. Wash Univ Law Rev 86(5):1053-1115
41. Lewis R (2004) Elder law in Australia. LexisNexis Butterworths, Sydney
42. Marshall TH (1963) Sociology at the crossroads and other essays. Heinemann, London
43. Minkowitz T (2010) Abolishing mental health laws to comply with the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. In: McSherry B, Weller P (eds) Rethinking rights-based mental health laws. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 151-177
44. Morris G (2009) 'Let's Do the Time Warp Again': assessing the competence of counsel in mental health conservatorship proceedings. San Diego Law Rev 46(2):283-342
45. Moye J, Wood E, Edelstein B, Wood S et al (2007) Statutory reform is associated with improved court practice: results of a tri-state comparison. Behav Sci Law 25(3):425-436
46. Newberry AM, Pachet AK (2008) An innovative framework for psychosocial assessment in complex mental capacity evaluations. Psychol Health Med 13(4):438-449
47. NSW Legislative Council (2010) Substitute decision-making for people lacking capacity. NSW Legislative Council Standing Committee on Social Issues, Sydney
48. Pascalev A, Vidalis T (2010) 'Vague Oviedo': autonomy, culture and the case of previously competent patients. Bioethics 24(3):145-152
49. Polivka L, Moody H (2001) A debate on the ethics of aging: does the concept of autonomy provide a sufficient framework for aging policy? J Aging Ident 6(4):223-237
50. Productivity Commission (2011) Caring For Older Australians: Draft report. http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/inquiry/aged-care/draft. Accessed 21 Jan 2011
51. QLRC (2008) Shaping Queensland's Guardianship Legislation: principles and capacity-discussion paper. Queensland Law Reform Commission, Brisbane, pp 1-169
52. Ramesh M (2004) Review article: issues in globalisation and social welfare in Asia. Soc Pol Soc 3 (3):321-327
53. Salzman L (2010) Rethinking Guardianship (Again): Substituted Decision Making as a Violation of the Integration Mandate of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Univ Colorado Law Rev 81(1):158-245. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1523387
54. Sen A (2009) The idea of justice. Allen Lane, London
55. Sweet V (2007) Thy will be done: think your living will takes care of everything? Maybe not. Health Aff 26(3):825-830
56. Takahashi M (2004) Beyond crisis and dissonance: the restructuring of the Japanese welfare state under globalism. Soc Pol Soc 3(3):283-290
57. Thane P (2001) Changing paradigms of ageing and being older: an historical perspective. In: Weisstub D, Thomasma D, Gauthier S, Tomossy G (eds) Aging: culture, health, and social change, vol 10. Kluwer, The Hague, pp 1-14
58. Tilse C, Wilson J, Setterlund D, Robinson G (2003) Families, asset management and care giving: developing issues in policy, research and practice. 8th Australian Institute of Family Studies Conference, Melbourne
59. Tilse C, Setterlund D, Wilson J, Rosenman L (2005) Minding the money: a growing responsibility for informal carers. Ageing Soc 25(02):215-227
60. VLRC (2011) Guardianship consultation paper. Victorian Law Reform Commission, Melbourne, pp 1-458
61. Weller P (2008) Supported decision-making and the achievement of non-discrimination: the promise and paradox of the disabilities convention. Law in Context 26(2):85-110
62. Whitton L (2001) Finding the elder voice in legislation. Int J Law Psychiatry 24(2/3):149-165
63. Whitton L (2007) Durable powers as an alternative to guardianship: lessons we have learned. Stetson Law Rev 37(7):7-57
64. Wood E (2005) History of guardianship. In: Quinn MJ (ed) Guardianship of adults: achieving justice autonomy and safety. Springer, New York, pp 17-48