Development and evaluation of multi-marker risk scores for clinical prognosis

Statistical Methods in Medical Research

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 255-271

  French, Benjamin ^a   Saha Chaudhuri, Paramita ^b   Ky, Bonnie ^a   Cappola, Thomas P ^c   Heagerty, Patrick J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Cox regression; predictive accuracy; receiver operating characteristic curve; risk reclassification; survival analysis

Indexed keywords

AMINO TERMINAL PRO BRAIN NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE; BIOLOGICAL MARKER; ST2 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; BRAIN NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE; IL1RL1 PROTEIN, HUMAN; INTERLEUKIN 1 RECEPTOR LIKE 1 PROTEIN; PEPTIDE FRAGMENT; PRO-BRAIN NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE (1-76);

ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE ASSESSMENT; HEART FAILURE; HEART TRANSPLANTATION; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MORTALITY; PROGNOSIS; PROGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCORING SYSTEM; SEATTLE HEART FAILURE MODEL; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURVIVAL PREDICTION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOSTATISTICS; BLOOD; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RISK FACTOR;

BIOMARKERS; BIOSTATISTICS; HEART FAILURE; HUMANS; INTERLEUKIN-1 RECEPTOR-LIKE 1 PROTEIN; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE, BRAIN; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RISK FACTORS; ROC CURVE;

EID: 84958687307     PISSN: 09622802     EISSN: 14770334     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0962280212451881     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011; 123: e18-e209.
2. Neubauer S,. The failing heart-an engine out of fuel. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 1140-1151.
3. Vasan RS,. Biomarkers of cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2006; 113: 2335-2362.
4. Braunwald E,. Biomarkers in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2148-2159.
5. Koepsell T, Weiss NS,. Epidemiologic methods: studying the occurrence of disease, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
6. Janes H, Pepe MS,. Adjusting for covariate effects on classification accuracy using the covariate-adjusted receiver operating characteristic curve. Biometrika 2009; 96: 371-382.
7. Heagerty PJ, Lumley T, Pepe MS,. Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker. Biometrics 2000; 56: 337-344.
8. Heagerty PJ, Zheng Y,. Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves. Biometrics 2005; 61: 92-105.
9. Saha P, Heagerty PJ,. Time-dependent predictive accuracy in the presence of competing risks. Biometrics 2010; 66: 999-1011.
10. Levy WC, Mozaffarian D, Linker DT, et al. The Seattle Heart Failure Model: prediction of survival in heart failure. Circulation 2006; 113: 1424-1433.
11. Cox D,. Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc, Ser B 1972; 34: 187-220.
12. Zheng Y, Cai T, Feng Z,. Application of the time-dependent ROC curves for prognostic accuracy with multiple biomarkers. Biometrics 2006; 62: 279-287.
13. Cai T, Cheng S,. Robust combination of multiple diagnostic tests for classifying censored event times. Biostatistics 2008; 9: 216-233.
14. Hung H, Chiang C-T,. Optimal composite markers for time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves with censored survival data. Scand J Stat 2010; 37: 664-679.
15. Pepe MS, Janes H, Longton G, et al. Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159: 882-890.
16. Janes H, Pepe MS, Gu W,. Assessing the value of risk predictions by using risk stratification tables. Ann Inter Med 2008; 149: 751-760.
17. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB Sr, D'Agostino RB Jr, et al. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med 2008; 27: 157-172.
18. Cook NR, Ridker PM,. Advances in measuring the effect of individual predictors of cardiovascular risk: The role of reclassification measures. Ann Inter Med 2009; 150: 795-802.
19. Viallon V, Ragusa S, Clavel-Chapelon F, et al. How to evaluate the calibration of a disease risk prediction tool. Stat Med 2009; 28: 901-916.
20. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino Sr RB, Steyerberg EW,. Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers. Stat Med 2011; 30: 11-21.
21. Ky B, French B, McCloskey K, et al. High-sensitivity ST2 for prediction of adverse outcomes in chronic heart failure. Circ Heart Fail 2011; 4: 180-187.
22. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ,. An introduction to the bootstrap, New York: Chapman and Hall, 1993.
23. Therneau TM, Grambsch PM, Fleming TR,. Martingale-based residuals for survival models. Biometrika 1990; 77: 147-160.
24. Cook NR, Paynter NP,. Performance of reclassification statistics in comparing risk prediction models. Biometrical J 2011; 53: 237-258.
25. Pepe MS,. Problems with risk reclassification methods for evaluating prediction models. Am J Epidemiol 2011; 173: 1327-1335.
26. Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Begg CB,. One statistical test is sufficient for assessing new predictive markers. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011; 11: 13.
27. Grambsch P, Therneau T,. Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika 1994; 81: 515-526.
28. McKeague IW, Sasieni PD,. A partly parametric additive risk model. Biometrika 1994; 81: 501-514.
29. Copas JP, Corbett P,. Overestimation of the receiver operating characteristic curve for logistic regression. Biometrika 2002; 89: 315-331.
30. Simon RM, Subramanian J, Li M-C, et al. Using cross-validation to evaluate predictive accuracy of survival risk classifiers based on high-dimensional data. Brief Bioinform 2011; 12: 203-214.
31. Therneau T, Lumley T,. survival: Survival analysis, including penalized likelihood. R package version 2.36-9, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival.
32. Scheike TH,. timereg: timereg package for flexible regression models for survival data. R package version 1.6-3, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=timereg.
33. Scheike TH, Martinussen T,. Dynamic regression models for survival data, New York: Springer, 2006.
34. Heagerty PJ, Saha P,. survivalROC: time-dependent ROC curve estimation from censored survival data. R package version 1.0.0, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survivalROC.
35. Saha P, Heagerty PJ,. Introduction to survivalROC: an R package for survival-ROC method. http://faculty.washington.edu/heagerty/Software/SurvROC/.