Gabor feature space diffusion via the minimal weighted area method

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2134, Issue , 2001, Pages 621-635

  Sagiv, Chen ^a   Sochen, Nir A ^a   Zeevi, Yehoshua Y ^b  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Anisotropic diffusion; Beltrami framework; Gabor analysis; Geodesic active contours; Geometric based algorithms; Image manifolds; Minimal weighted area method

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER VISION; DIFFUSION; GEODESY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION;

ANISOTROPIC DIFFUSION; BELTRAMI FRAMEWORK; GABOR ANALYSIS; GEODESIC ACTIVE CONTOUR; IMAGE MANIFOLDS; WEIGHTED AREAS;

STEREO IMAGE PROCESSING;

EID: 84958663696     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44745-8_41     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. P. Brodatz, Textures: A photographic album for Artists and Designers, New York, NY, Dover, 1996.
2. V. Caselles and R. Kimmel and G. Sapiro, “Geodesic Active Contours“, International Journal of Computer Vision, 22(1), 1997, 61-97.
3. R. Conners and C. Harlow “A Theoretical Comparison of Texture Algorithms” IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 2, 1980, 204-222.
4. G.R. Cross and A.K. Jain, “Markov Random Field Texture Models” IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 5, 1983, 25-39.
5. J.G. Daugman, “Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters“, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 2(7), 1985, 1160-1169.
6. O. Faugeras and R. Keriven, “Variational Principles, surface evolution PDE’s, level set methods, and the stereo problem ”, IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, 7(3), (1998) 336-344.
7. D. Gabor “Theory of communication“J. IEEE, 93, 1946, 429-459.
8. S. Geman and D. Geman “Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distribution and the Bayesian restoration of images“, IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 6, 1984, 721-741.
9. B. Julesz “Texton Gradients: The Texton Theory Revisited“, Biol Cybern, 54, (1986) 245-251.
10. M. Kaas, A. Witkin and D. Terzopoulos, “Snakes: Active Contour Models“, International Journal of Computer Vision, 1, 1988, 321-331.
11. S. Kichenassamy, A. Kumar, P. Olver, A. Tannenbaum and A. Yezzi, “Gradient Flows and Geometric Active Contour Models”, Proceedings ICCV’95, Boston, Massachusetts, 1995, 810-815.
12. R. Kimmel, “3D Shape Reconstruction from Autostereograms and Stereo”, Special issue on PDEs in Image Processing, Computer Vision, and Computer Graphics, Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation. In press.
13. R. Kimmel, N. Sochen and R. Malladi, “On the geometry of texture”, Proceedings of the 4th International conference on Mathematical Methods for Curves and Surfaces, St. Malo, 1999.
14. R. Kimmel and N. Sochen. “Orientation Diffusion or How to Comb a Porcupine ?”, Special issue on PDEs in Image Processing, Computer Vision, and Computer Graphics, Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation. In press.
15. T.S. Lee, “Image Representation using 2D Gabor-Wavelets“, IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 18(10), 1996, 959-971.
16. S. Marcelja, “Mathematical description of the response of simple cortical cells”, J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 70, 1980, 1297-1300.
17. J. Morlet, G. Arens, E. Fourgeau and D. Giard, “Wave propagation and sampling theory - part 2: samplingtheory and complex waves”, Geophysics, 47(2), 1982, 222-236.
18. M. Porat and Y.Y. Zeevi, “The generalized Gabor scheme of image representation in biological and machine vision“, IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 10(4), 1988, 452-468.
19. M. Porat and Y.Y. Zeevi, “Localized texture processingin vision: Analysis and synthesis in the gaborian space“, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 36(1), 1989, 115-129.
20. S.J. Osher and J.A. Sethian, “Fronts propagating with curvature dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations“, J of Computational Physics, 79, 1988, 12-49.
21. C. Sagiv, N. Sochen, and Y.Y. Zeevi, “Gabor Space Geodesic Active Contours”, G. Sommer, Y.Y. Zeevi (Eds.), Algebraic Frames for the Perception-Action Cycle, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1888, Springer, Berlin, 2000.
22. N. Sochen, R. Kimmel and R. Malladi, “A general framework for low level vision”, IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, 7, (1998) 310-318.
23. S.C. Zhu, Y.N. Wu and D.B. Mumford, “Equivalence of Julesz ensembles and FRAME models“, International Journal of Computer Vision, 38(3), 2000, 247-265.
24. M. Zibulski and Y.Y. Zeevi, “Analysis of multiwindow Gabor-type schemes by frame methods“, AppliedandComputational Harmonic Analysis, 4, 1997, 188-221.