Towards CBR for bioprocess planning

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1168, Issue , 1996, Pages 16-27

  Aarts, Robert J ^a   Rousu, Juho ^a  

^a VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING;

CASE ADAPTATION; CASE-BASED REASONER; NUMERICAL VALUES; OBJECT-ORIENTED FRAMEWORKS; PROCESS OPERATORS; QUALITATIVE MODEL; QUANTITATIVE INFORMATION; RECIPE PARAMETERS;

CASE BASED REASONING;

EID: 84958646284     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/BFb0020599     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Aamodt, A. (1994). Explanation-driven case-based reasoning, In S. Wess, K. Althoff, M. Richter (eds.): Topics in Case-based reasoning. Springer Verlag, pp 274-288.
2. Aarts, R. J. (1992). Knowledge-based systems for bioprocesses. Technical Research Centre of Finland, Publications 120, 116 p.
3. Aarts, R. J., Sjöholm, K., Home, S. & Pietilä, K. (1993). Computer-planned mashing. Proc. of the European Brewery Convention Congress, Oslo, 1993, pp. 655-662.
4. Alberts, L. K. (1993). YMIR: an ontology for engineering design, PhD-thesis, ISBN 90-9006128-2.
5. Bhatta, S., Goel, A. & Prabhakar, S. (1994). Innovation in Analogical Design: A Model-Based Approach. Proc. of the Third International Conference on A1 in Design, Aug. 1994, Lausanne, Switzerland.
6. DeJong, G. F. (1994). Learning to plan in continuous domains. Artificial Intelligence 65: 71-141.
7. Forbus K.D. (1984). Qualitative Process Theory. Artificial Intelligence 24: 85-168.
8. Fox, M., Chionglo, J.F., & Fadel, F.G. (1993). A Common Sense Model of the Enterprise. Proceedings of the 2nd Industrial Engineering Research Conference, Norcross GA: Institute for Industrial Engineers, pp. 425-429.
9. Gruber, T. R. (1991). The Role of Common Ontology in Achieving Sharable, Reusable Knowledge Bases. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Second International Conference, Cambridge, MA, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., pp. 601-602.
10. Hammond, K. (1990). Explaining and Repairing Plans That Fail. Artificial Intelligence, 45:173-228.
11. Hammond, K., Converse, T. & Marks, M. (1993). Toward a Theory of Agency. In: Machine Learning Methods for Planning, Minton, S. (ed), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Diego, pp. 351-396.
12. Hastings, J.D., Branting, L.K. & Lockwood, J.A. (1995), Case Adaptation Using an Incomplete Causal Model. In: Veloso, M. & Aamodt, A. (Eds.): Case-based reasoning research and development." 1st Intl. Conf. ICCBR-95, Sesimbra, Portugal, Oct. 1995, Springer, pp. 181-192.
13. Johnson, R. E. & Russo, V. F. (1991) Reusing Object Oriented Designs. University of Illinois tech. report UIUCDCS 91-1696.
14. Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-Based Reasoning. Morgan-Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Mateo CA, 668 p.
15. Koton, P. (1989). Using experience in learning and problem solving. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Laboratory of Computer Science (Ph.D. diss., October 1988), MIT/LCS/TR-441.
16. Rousu, J. & Aarts, R.J. (1996). Adaptation Cost as a Criterion for Solution Evaluation. In this volume.
17. Sycara, K., Guttal, R., Koning, J., Narasimhan, S. & Navinchandra, D. (1992) CADET: a Case-based Synthesis Tool for Engineering Design, Intl. J. Expert Systems, 4:2.
18. Verdenius, F. (1997). Managing Product Inherent Variance During Treatment. Accepted for publication in: Computers & Electronics in Agriculture.