Comparison of CMM level 2 and extreme programming

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2349, Issue , 2002, Pages 288-297

  Nawrocki, Jerzy R ^a   Walter, Bartosz ^a   Wojciechowski, Adam ^a  

^a POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION;

CMM LEVELS; EXTREME PROGRAMMING; HIGH QUALITY; RISK FACTORS; SOFTWARE APPROACH; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGIES; SOFTWARE PROJECT;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 84958619940     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47984-8_32     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. K. Beck, Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2000.
2. K. Beck, M. Fowler, Planning Extreme Programming, Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2001.
3. G. Booch, Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications, Redwood City, Addison-Wesley, 1991.
4. CMMI Models, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/products/models.html (February 2002)
5. T. DeMarco, Structured Analysis and System Specification, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1978.
6. T. DeMarco, The Agile Organization, http://www.escom.co.uk/conference2001/papers/keynote-tom-demarco.pdf (February 2002)
7. C. Elgot, Structured programming with and without GO TO statements, IEEE Trans. Soft. Eng., No 1, 1976, 41-53.
8. M. Fagan, Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program development, IBM Systems Journal, vol. 15 (1976), No. 3.
9. J. Grenning, Launching Extreme Programming at a Process. Intensive Company, IEEE Software, vol. 18, No. 6, 27-33.
10. W. Humphrey, A Discipline for Software Engineering, Addison-Wesley, Reading MA, 1995.
11. W. Humphrey, Introduction to the Team Software Process, Addison-Wesley, Reading MA, 2000.
12. R. Jeffries, A. Anderson, C. Hendrickson, Extreme Programming Installed, Addison-Wesley, 2001.
13. J. Nawrocki, Towards educating leaders of software teams, in: P. Klint, J. Nawrocki (eds), Proceedings of Software Engineering Education Symposium SEES’98, Scientific Publishers OWN, Poznan, 1998, 149-157.
14. J. Nawrocki, A. Wojciechowski, Experimental evaluation of pair programming, in: K. Maxwell, S. Oligny, R. Kusters, E. van Veenendaal (eds), Project Control: Satisfying the Customer (Proceedings of ESCOM 2001, 2-4 April 2001, London, UK), Shaker Publishing, 2001, 269-276, http://www.escom.co.uk/conference2001/papers/nawrocki.pdf (February 2002)
15. J. Nawrocki, B. Walter, A. Wojciechowski, Toward maturity model for eXtreme Programming, Proceedings of the 27th EUROMICRO Conference, Los Alamitos, IEEE Computer Society, 233-239.
16. J. T. Nosek, The case for collaborative programming, Communications of the ACM, vol. 41 (1998), No. 3, 105-108.
17. D. L. Parnas, On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules, Communications of the ACM, vol. 15, No. 12 (1972), 1053-58.
18. M. C. Paulk et al., The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Inproving the Software Process, Addison-Wesley, Reading MA, 1995.
19. M. C. Paulk, Extreme Programming from a CMM Perspective, IEEE Software, vol. 18, No. 6, 19-26.
20. Ch. Poole, J. W. Huisman, Using Extreme Programming in a Maintenance Environment, IEEE Software, vol. 18, No. 6, 42-50.
21. J. Seddon, The Case Against ISO 9000, Oak Tree Press, Dublin, 2000.
22. P. Schuh, Recovery, Redemption, and Extreme Programming, IEEE Software, vol. 18, No. 6, 34-41.
23. B. Stroustrup, The C++ Programming Language, Addison-Wesley, Reading MA, 1985.
24. R. Tricker, B. Sherring-Lucas, ISO 9001:2000 in Brief, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2001.
25. L. Williams et al., Strengthening the case for pair programming, IEEE Software, vol. 17 (2000), No. 4, 19-25.
26. N. Wirth, Programming in Modula-2, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1982.