Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in High-risk Patients: A propensity-score matched analysis

Heart Lung and Circulation

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 661-667

  Zweng, India ^a,b   Shi, William Y ^a,b   Palmer, Sonny ^a,b   MacIsaac, Andrew ^a,b   Whitbourn, Robert ^a,b   Davis, Philip ^a,b   Newcomb, Andrew E ^a,b  

^a ST VINCENT S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Aortic stenosis; Aortic valve replacement; Cardiac surgery; Elderly; High risk; Transcatheter aortic valve insertion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPLETE HEART BLOCK; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE SAFETY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ERYTHROCYTE TRANSFUSION; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM ARRHYTHMIA; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; PARAVALVULAR LEAK; PERCUTANEOUS AORTIC VALVE; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; SURGICAL RISK; SURVIVAL TIME; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RISK FACTOR; SURVIVAL RATE; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROPENSITY SCORE; RISK FACTORS; SURVIVAL RATE; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 84958581203     PISSN: 14439506     EISSN: 14442892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. [1] Vahanian, A., Alfieri, O., Andreotti, F., Antunes, M.J., Baron-Esquivias, G., Baumgartner, H., et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). European Heart Journal. 33:19 (2012), 2451–2496.
2. [2] Smith, C.R., Leon, M.B., Mack, M.J., Miller, D.C., Moses, J.W., Svensson, L.G., et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. The New England Journal of Medicine. 364:23 (2011), 2187–2198.
3. [3] Soh, S., Wong, D., Aortic stenosis and aging. OA Elderly Medicine., 182(1), 2014, 1.
4. [4] Al-Lamee, R., Godino, C., Colombo, A., Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Current Principles of Patient and Technique Selection and Future Perspectives. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions 4:4 (2011), 387–395.
5. [5] Austin, P.C., Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review and suggestions for improvement. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 134:5 (2007), 1128–1135.
6. [6] Kodali, S.K., Williams, M.R., Smith, C.R., Svensson, L.G., Webb, J.G., Makkar, R.R., et al. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. The New England Journal of Medicine. 366:18 (2012), 1686–1695.
7. [7] Mack MJ, Leon MB, Smith CR, Miller DC, Moses JW, Tuzcu EM, et al. 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 385(9986): 2477–84.
8. [8] Barker, C.M., Reardon, M.J., The CoreValve US pivotal trial. Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 26:3 (2014), 179–186.
9. [9] Timek, T.A., Turfe, Z., Hooker, R.L., Davis, A.T., Willekes, C.L., Murphy, E.T., et al. Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians with prior cardiac surgery. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 99:2 (2015), 518–523.
10. [10] Biondi-Zoccai, G., Peruzzi, M., Abbate, A., Gertz, Z.M., Benedetto, U., Tonelli, E., et al. Network meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve or Sapien devices versus surgical replacement. Heart, Lung and Vessels 6:4 (2014), 232–243.
11. [11] Bleiziffer, S., Ruge, H., Horer, J., Hutter, A., Geisbusch, S., Brockmann, G., et al. Predictors for new-onset complete heart block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 3:5 (2010), 524–530.