The use of systems modeling in legislative program evaluation

New Directions for Evaluation

Volumn 1999, Issue 81, 1999, Pages 45-60

  McIntire, Patrick W ^a   Glaze, Ann S ^b  

^a Oregon Employment Department   (United States)

^b Oregon Legislative Fiscal Office   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958562289     PISSN: 10976736     EISSN: 1534875X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ev.1126     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Brooks, R. A., “Blending Two Cultures: State Legislative Auditing and Evaluation.“In C. Wisler., (ed.), Evaluation and Auditing: Prospects for Convergence.New Directions for Evaluation, no. 71. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1996.
2. Cochrane, D. D., Kestle, J., Steinbok, P., Evans, D., and Heron, N., “Model for the Cost Analysis of Shunted Hydrocephalic Children.“Pediatric Neurosurgery, 1995, 23, 14-19.
3. Kim, D. H., “Toward Learning Organizations: Integrating Total Quality Control and Systems Thinking.“Unpublished paper, 1990.
4. Marvin, K. E., “Evaluation for Congressional Committees: The Quest for Effective Procedures.“In F. M.Zweig (ed.), Evaluation in Legislation. Sage Research Progress Series in Evaluation, vol. 5.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1979.
5. Morecroft, J.D.W., “System Dynamics and Microworlds for Policymakers.“European Journal of Operational Research, 1988, 35, 301-320.
6. Oregon Secretary of State Audits Division.Oregon Commission on Children and Families: Funding and Use of Local Services.Report No. 96-54.Nov. 20, 1996.
7. Richmond, B., “Systems Dynamics/Systems Thinking-Let’s Just Get On with It.“Paper presented at the International System Dynamics Conference, Sterling, Scotland, 1994.
8. Stokey, E., and Zeckhauser, R., A Primer for Policy Analysis.New York: Norton, 1978.
9. Weiss, C. H., “Introduction.“In C. H.Weiss (ed.), Using Social Research in Public Policy-Making.Lexington, Mass.: Heath, 1977.