A graph based automatic plagiarism detection technique to handle artificial word reordering and paraphrasing

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8404 LNCS, Issue PART 2, 2014, Pages 481-494

  Kumar, Niraj ^a  

^a TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES   (India)

Author keywords

controlled closeness centrality; minimum weighted bipartite graph clique cover; normalized pointwise mutual information; Plagiarism detection; semantic graph

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; GRAPHIC METHODS; SEMANTICS; TEXT PROCESSING;

BIPARTITE GRAPH CLIQUE; CLOSENESS CENTRALITIES; PLAGIARISM DETECTION; POINTWISE MUTUAL INFORMATION; SEMANTIC GRAPHS;

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY;

EID: 84958541432     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-54903-8_40     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Barron-Cedeno, A., Vila, M., Martí, M.A., Rosso, P.: Plagiarism Meets Paraphrasing: Insights for the Next Generation in Automatic Plagiarism Detection. Computational Linguistics. MIT Press (2013), doi: 10.1162/COLI-a-00153.
2. IEEE. 2008. A Plagiarism FAQ, http://www.ieee.org/publicationsstandards/ publications/rights/plagiarismFAQ.html (last accessed November 25, 2012)
3. Bhagat, R., Hovy, E.: What Is a Paraphrase? Computational Linguistics. MIT Press (2013), doi:10.1162/COLI-a-00166.
4. Bouma, G.: Normalized (Pointwise) Mutual Information in Collocation Extraction. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of the German Society for Computational Linguistics and Language Technology, pp. 31-40 (2009)
5. Clough, P., Stevenson, M.: Developing a corpus of plagiarised short answers. In: Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2010, vol. 2010 (2009)
6. Kong, L., Qi, H., Wang, S., Du, C., Wang, S., Han, Y.: Approaches for Candidate Document Retrieval and Detailed Comparison of Plagiarism Detection-Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2012, http://www.clef-initiative.eu/ publication/working-notes, ISBN 978-88-904810-3-1
7. Suchomel, Š., Kasprzak, J., Brandejs, M.: Three Way Search Engine Queries with Multifeature Document Comparison for Plagiarism Detection-Notebook for PAN at CLEF (2012). In: Forner et al [6], http://www.clef-initiative.eu/ publication/working-notes, ISBN 978-88-904810-3-1
8. Grozea, C., Popescu, M.: Encoplot - Tuned for High Recall (also proposing a new plagiarism detection score). In Forner et al. [6], http://www.clef- initiative.eu/publication/working-notes, ISBN 978-88-904810-3-1
9. Potthast, M., Gollub, T., Hagen, M., Kiesel, J., Michel, M., Oberländer, A., Tippmann, M., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Gupta, P., Rosso, P., Stein, B.: Overview of the 4th International Competition on Plagiarism Detection. CLEF (Online Working Notes/Labs/Workshop) (2012)
10. Chong, M., Specia, L., Mitkov, R.: Using Natural Language Processing for Automatic Detection of Plagiarism. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Plagiarism Conference (IPC 2010), Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK (2010)
11. Kumar, N., Srinathan, K., Varma, V.: A Knowledge Induced Graph-Theoretical Model for Extract and Abstract Single Document Summarization. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7817, pp. 408-423. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
12. Nahnsen, T., Uzuner, O., Katz, B.: Lexical chains and sliding locality windows in contentbased text similarity detection. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (IJCNLP 2005), Jeju Island, Korea, pp. 150-154 (2005)
13. Zini, M., Fabbri, M., Moneglia, M., Panunzi, A.: Plagiarism Detection through Multilevel Text Comparison. In: 2006 Second International Conference on Automated Production of Cross Media Content for Multi-Channel Distribution (AXMEDIS 2006), December 2006, pp. 181-185 (2006), doi:10.1109/AXMEDIS.2006.40.
14. Lancaster, T., Culwin, F.: A Visual Argument for Plagiarism Detection using Word Pairs. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Plagiarism Conference, Newcastle, UK, vol. 4, pp. 1-14 (2004a)
15. Hoad, T., Zobel, J.: Methods for identifying versioned and plagiarized documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54(3), 203-215 (2003)
16. Shivakumar, N., Garcia-Molina, H.: SCAM: A copy detection mechanism for digital documents. In: Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference on the Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, Texas, USA, pp. 1-13 (1995)
17. Ceska, Z.: Automatic Plagiarism Detection Based on Latent Semantic Analysis. Doctoral thesis, University of West Bohemia (2009)
18. Alzahrani, S., Salim, N.: Fuzzy Semantic-Based String Similarity for Lab Report for PAN at CLEF 2010. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF 2010), Uncovering Plagiarism, Authorship, and Social Software Misuse Worksop (PAN 2010), Padua, Italy (2010)
19. Chen, C.-Y., Yeh, J.-Y., Ke, H.-R.: Plagiarism Detection using ROUGE and WordNet. Journal of Computing 2(3), 34-44 (2010)
20. Kohler, K., Weber-Wul, D.: Plagiarism Detection Test 2010. Technical report, HTW Berlin (2010)
21. Scott, S., Matwin, S.: Text classification using WordNet hypernyms.In: Use of WordNet in Natural Language Processing Systems: Proceedings of the Conference (1998)
22. Tang, Liu: Community Detection and Mining in Social Media. Morgan & Claypool Publishers (2010)
23. Hartrumpf, S., vor der Brück, T., Eichhorn, C.: Semantic duplicate identification with parsing and machine learning. In: Sojka, P., Horák, A., Kopeček, I., Pala, K. (eds.) TSD 2010. LNCS, vol. 6231, pp. 84-92. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)