New eyes for shape and motion estimation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1811, Issue , 2000, Pages 118-128

  Baker, Patrick ^a   Pless, Robert ^a   Fermülle, Cornelia ^a   Aloimonos, Yiannis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CALIBRATION; CAMERAS; COMPUTER VISION; RIGIDITY;

3D TRANSLATION; ACCURATE ESTIMATION; CAMERA SYSTEMS; ESTIMATION RESULTS; FIELD OF VIEWS; NOVEL ALGORITHM; SELF CALIBRATION; SYSTEM CALIBRATION;

MOTION ESTIMATION;

EID: 84958540522     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45482-9_12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. G. Adiv. Inherent ambiguities in recovering 3D motion and structure from a noisy flow field. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 70-77, 1985.
2. K. Daniilidis and M. E. Spetsakis. Understanding noise sensitivity in structure from motion. In Y. Aloimonos, editor, Visual Navigation: From Biological Systems to Unmanned Ground Vehicles, Advances in Computer Vision, chapter
3. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1997.
4. A.M. Earnshaw and S.D. Blostein. The performance of camera translation direction estimators from optical-flow: Analysis, comparison, and theoretical limits. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18(9):927-932, September 1996.
5. Joshua Gluckman and Shree K. Nayar. Egomotion and omnidirectional sensors. In Proc. International Conference on Computer Vision, 1998.
6. D. J. Heeger and A. D. Jepson. Subspace methods for recovering rigid motion I: Algorithm and implementation. International Journal of Computer Vision, 7:95-117, 1992.
7. B. K. P. Horn. Robot Vision. McGraw Hill, New York, 1986.
8. H. Ishiguro, K. Ueda, and S. Tsuji. Omnidirectional visual information for navigating a mobile robot. In Proceedings of 1993 IEEE International Conference onRobotics and Automation, volume 1, pages 799-804. IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, 1993.
9. J. J. Koenderink and A. J. van Doorn. Invariant properties of the motion parallax field due to the movement of rigid bodies relative to an observer. Optica Acta, 22:773-791, 1975.
10. H. C. Longuet-Higgins. A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections. Nature, 293:133-135, 1981.
11. D. Marr. Vision. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA, 1982.
12. S. J. Maybank. Theory of Reconstruction from Image Motion. Springer, Berlin, 1993.
13. S. Nayar. Catadioptric omnidirectional camera. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 482-488, Puerto Rico, 1997.
14. R. C. Nelson and J. Aloimonos. Finding motion parameters from spherical flow fields (or the advantage of having eyes in the back of your head). Biological Cybernetics, 58:261-273, 1988.
15. Federico Pedersini, Augusto Sarti, and Stefano Tubaro. Egomotion estimation of a multicamera system through line correspondences. In Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing, volume 2, pages 175-178. IEEE Computer Society, 1997.
16. M. E. Spetsakis and J. Aloimonos. Optimal motion estimation. In Proc. IEEE Workshop on Visual Motion, pages 229-237, 1989.
17. An-Ting Tsao, Yi-Ping Hung, Chiou-Shann Fuh, and Yong-Sheng Chen. Egomotion estimation using optical flow fields observed from multiple cameras. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 457-462. IEEE Computer Society, 1997.
18. S. Ullman. The Interpretation of Visual Motion. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1979.