메뉴 건너뛰기
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 497-499
Explaining the number of counterfactual cases needed to disturb a finding: a reply to Kuha and Sturgis
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

EID: 84958536850     PISSN: 13645579     EISSN: 14645300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2015.1126494     Document Type: Note
Times cited : (3)
References (3)
  • 1
    • 84929844332 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A proposal for judging the trustworthiness of research findings
    • S.Gorard, (2014). A proposal for judging the trustworthiness of research findings. Radical Statistics, 110, 47–60.
    • (2014) Radical Statistics , vol.110 , pp. 47-60
    • Gorard, S.1
  • 2
    • 84945218747 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What to do instead of significance testing? Calculating the ‘number of counterfactual cases needed to disturb a finding’
    • S.Gorard,, & J.Gorard, (2015). What to do instead of significance testing? Calculating the ‘number of counterfactual cases needed to disturb a finding’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, http://tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13645579.2015.1091235
    • (2015) International Journal of Social Research Methodology
    • Gorard, S.1    Gorard, J.2
  • 3
    • 84902442846 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ethnic diversity, segregation and the social cohesion of neighbourhoods in London
    • P.Sturgis,, I.Brunton-Smith,, J.Kuha,, & J.Jackson, (2014). Ethnic diversity, segregation and the social cohesion of neighbourhoods in London. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37, 1286–1309.10.1080/01419870.2013.831932
    • (2014) Ethnic and Racial Studies , vol.37 , pp. 1286-1309
    • Sturgis, P.1    Brunton-Smith, I.2    Kuha, J.3    Jackson, J.4

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.