Erratum: Project ACHIEVE - Using implementation research to guide the evaluation of transitional care effectiveness (BMC Health Services Research (2016) 16 (70) DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1312-y);Project ACHIEVE - Using implementation research to guide the evaluation of transitional care effectiveness Organization, structure and delivery of healthcare

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Li, Jing ^a   Brock, Jane ^b   Jack, Brian ^c   Mittman, Brian ^d,e,f   Naylor, Mary ^g   Sorra, Joanna ^h   Mays, Glen ⁱ   Williams, Mark V ^j  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b Telligen   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^e VA GREATER LOS ANGELES HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^h WESTAT   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Comparative effectiveness; Implementation research; Patient centered; Transitional care

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANCESTRY GROUP; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DEMOGRAPHY; ETHNIC GROUP; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICARE; MIDDLE AGED; MINORITY GROUP; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RESEARCH; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TRANSITIONAL CARE; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONTINENTAL POPULATION GROUPS; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; ETHNIC GROUPS; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; MEDICARE; MIDDLE AGED; MINORITY GROUPS; PATIENT DISCHARGE; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESEARCH; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TRANSITIONAL CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84958247488     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1560-x     Document Type: Erratum

References (33)

1. Naylor MD, et al. Comprehensive discharge planning and home follow-up of hospitalized elders: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 1999;281(7):613-20.
2. Coleman EA, et al. The care transitions intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(17):1822-8.
3. Stauffer BD, et al. Effectiveness and cost of a transitional care program for heart failure: a prospective study with concurrent controls. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(14):1238-43.
4. Voss R, et al. The care transitions intervention: translating from efficacy to effectiveness. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(14):1232-7.
5. Jack BW, et al. A reengineered hospital discharge program to decrease rehospitalization: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(3):178-87.
6. Hansen LO, et al. Project BOOST: Effectiveness of a multihospital effort to reduce rehospitalization. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(8):421-7.
7. Coleman EA. Falling through the cracks: challenges and opportunities for improving transitional care for persons with continuous complex care needs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(4):549-55.
8. Greenwald J, Denham C, Jack B. The Hospital Discharge: A Review of a High Risk Care Transition With Highlights of a Reengineered Discharge Process. Journal of Patient Safety. 2007;3(2):97-106.
9. Forster AJ, et al. The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(3):161-7.
10. Anthony D, et al. Patient Safety at Time of Discharge - An Example of a Multifaceted Process Evaluation. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, Lewin DI, editors. Advances in patient safety: from research to implementation. Vol. 2, Concepts and methodology. AHRQ Publication No. 05-0021-2. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005.
11. Coleman EA, Williams MV. Executing high-quality care transitions: a call to do it right. J Hosp Med. 2007;2(5):287-90.
12. Kripalani S, et al. Promoting effective transitions of care at hospital discharge: a review of key issues for hospitalists. J Hosp Med. 2007;2(5):314-23.
13. Ashton CM, et al. The association between the quality of inpatient care and early readmission: a meta-analysis of the evidence. Med Care. 1997;35(10):1044-59.
14. van Walraven C, et al. Proportion of hospital readmissions deemed avoidable: a systematic review. CMAJ. 2011;183(7):E391-402.
15. Kripalani S, et al. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA. 2007;297(8):831-41.
16. Konetzka RT, Spector W, Limcangco MR. Reducing hospitalizations from long-term care settings. Med Care Res Rev. 2008;65(1):40-66.
17. Creswell JW, Klassen AC, Plano Clark VL, Smith KC for the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. August 2011 [cited 2015 August]; Available from: http://obssr.od.nih.gov/mixed-methods-research.
18. Naylor M, et al. Comparison of evidence-based interventions on outcomes of hospitalized, cognitively impaired older adults. J Comp Eff Res. 2014;3(3):245-57.
19. The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC), March 2010 Report to the Congress: Medicare Payment Policy. http://www.medpac.gov/documents/reports/Mar10-EntireReport.pdf?sfvrsn=0.
20. Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B. Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. Qual Health Care. 1998;7(3):149-58.
21. Wandersman A, et al. Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008; 41(3-4):171-81.
22. Damschroder LJ, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.
23. Glasgow RE, Vogt Tm, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322-7.
24. Greysen SR, et al. Understanding transitions in care from hospital to homeless shelter: a mixed-methods, community-based participatory approach. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(11):1484-91.
25. Israel BA, et al. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173-202.
26. Wallerstein N, Duran B. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Public Health. 2010;100 Suppl 1:S40-6.
27. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc; 1990. p. 53.
28. PCORI (Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute) Methodology Committee. 2013. "The PCORI Methodology Report." [Access Date February 14, 2016]; Available from: http://www.pcori.org/research-results/pcori-methodology-report/pcori-methodology-report.
29. Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley; 2009.
30. Kim CS, Flanders SA. Transitions of care. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(5 Pt 1):ITC3-1.
31. Kessler R, Glasgow RE. A proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice: dramatic change is needed. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(6):637-44.
32. Berkowitz RE, et al. Project ReEngineered Discharge (RED) lowers hospital readmissions of patients discharged from a skilled nursing facility. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(10):736-40.
33. Li J, et al. The physician mentored implementation model: a promising quality improvement framework for health care change. Acad Med. 2015;90(3):303-10.