Recognition of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using high order Markov random field model

IFMBE Proceedings

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 2276-2279

  Huang, Yu Kun ^a,b   Yu, Sung Nien ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b SOUTHERN TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Autobinomial model; Markov random field; Maximum bivariate pseudolikelihood estimation; Microcalcifications

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; IMAGE RETRIEVAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; MARKOV PROCESSES; NEURAL NETWORKS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; X RAY SCREENS;

BACK PROPAGATION NEURAL NETWORKS; MAMMOGRAPHIC IMAGE ANALYSIS; MARKOV RANDOM FIELD MODELS; MARKOV RANDOM FIELDS; MICROCALCIFICATIONS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION METHOD; PSEUDO-LIKELIHOOD; SVM(SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE);

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

EID: 84958245469     PISSN: 16800737     EISSN: 14339277     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-36841-0_574     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Wang TC, Karayiannis NB. (1998) Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelets. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 17(4): 498-509.
2. Winkler G. (1995) Image Analysis, Random Fields and Dynamic Monte Carlo Methods. NY: Springer-Verlag.
3. Li SZ. (2001) Markov Random Field Modeling in Image Analysis. NY: Springer-Verlag.
4. Acuna CO. (1992) Texture modeling using Gibbs distribution. CVGIP: Graphical Model and Image Processing. 54: 210-222.
5. Besag J. (1974) Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B-36: 192-236.
6. Besag J. (1975) Statistical analysis of Non-lattice Data. The Statistician. 24: 179-195.
7. http://www.wiau.man.ac.uk/services/MIAS/MIAScom.html.