Kyphoplasty vs conservative treatment: A case-control study in 110 post-menopausal women population. Is kyphoplasty better than conservative treatment?

European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences

Volumn 19, Issue 21, 2015, Pages 3998-4003

  Colangelo, D ^a   Nasto, L A ^a   Genitiempo, M ^a   Formica, V M ^a   Autore, G ^a   Pambianco, V ^a   Tamburrelli, F C ^a   Cerulli, G ^a   Pola, Enrico ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Clinical outcomes; Conservative treatment; Kyphoplasty; Osteoporosis; Vertebral compression fractures

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRACE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQ5D QUESTIONNAIRE; FEMALE; FRACTURE IMMOBILIZATION; HUMAN; KYPHOPLASTY; KYPHOSIS; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROTIC VERTEBRAL FRACTURE; POSTMENOPAUSE; POSTMENOPAUSE OSTEOPOROSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHORT FORM 12; SPINE FRACTURE; VERY ELDERLY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPLICATION; EVALUATION STUDY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OSTEOPOROSIS, POSTMENOPAUSAL; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROCEDURES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPINAL FRACTURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BRACES; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; KYPHOPLASTY; KYPHOSIS; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; OSTEOPOROSIS, POSTMENOPAUSAL; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FRACTURES; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84958212849     PISSN: 11283602     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT STATEMENT. Who are candidates for prevention and treatment for osteoporosis? Osteoporos Int 1997; 7: 1-6.
2. JOHNELL O, KANIS JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 2006; 17: 1726-1733.
3. IQBAL MM, SOBHAN T. Osteoporosis: A review. Mo Med 2002; 99: 19-24.
4. GOLD DT. The clinical impact of vertebral fractures: Quality of life in women with osteoporosis. Bone 1996; 18(3 Suppl): 185S-189S.
5. LYRITIS GP, MAYASIS B, TSAKALAKOS N, LAMBROPOULOS A, GAZI S, KARACHALIOS T, TSEKOURA M, YIATZIDES A. The natural history of the osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Clin Rheumatol 1989; 8(2 Suppl): 66-69.
6. PRATHER H, WATSON JO, GILULA LA. Nonoperative management of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Injury 2007; 38(3 Suppl): S40-48.
7. PARK YS, KIM HS. Prevention and treatment of multiple osteoporotic compression fracture. Asian Spine J 2014; 8: 382-390.
8. NASTO LA, FUSCO A, COLANGELO D, MORMANDO M, DI GIACOMO G, ROSSI B, DE MARINIS L, LOGROSCINO CA, POLA E. Clinical predictors of vertebral osteoporotic fractures in post-menopausal women: A crosssectional analysis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2012; 16: 1227-1234.
9. BRÒDANO GB, COLANGELI S, BABBI L, GASBARRINI A, BANDIERA S, TERZI S, GRIFFONI C, DI FIORE M, BORIANI L, CORGHI A, BORIANI S. Osteoporotic vertebral fractures: A disabling and expensive disease of our century. A minimally invasive surgical technique to reduce the pain, the hospitalization, and restore the function. Eur Rev Med Pharmaco Sci 2011; 15: 1473-1477.
10. GARFIN SR, YUAN HA, REILEY MA. New technologies in spine: Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine 2001; 26: 1511-1515.
11. MEHIO AK, LERNER JH, ENGELHART LM, KOZMA CM, SLATON TL, EDWARDS NC, LAWLER GJ. Comparative hospital economics and patient presentation: Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fracture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 1290-1294.
12. JARVIK JG, KALLMES DF. Point of view. Efficacy of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Spine 2009; 34: 613-614.
13. STEVENSON M, GOMERSALL T, LLOYD JONES M, RAWDIN A, HERNÁNDEZ M, DIAS S, WILSON D, REES A. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: A systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess 2014; 18: 1-290.
14. KALLMES DF, COMSTOCK BA, HEAGERTY PJ, TURNER JA, WILSON DJ, DIAMOND TH, EDWARDS R, GRAY LA, STOUT L, OWEN S, HOLLINGWORTH W, GHDOKE B, ANNESLEY- WILLIAMS DJ, RALSTON SH, JARVIK JG. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 569-579.
15. WEINSTEIN JN. Balancing science and informed choice in decisions about vertebroplasty. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 619-621.
16. DE KONG L, MENG LC, SHEN Y, WANG LF, WANG P, SHANG ZK. Effect of shape and severity of vertebral fractures on the outcomes of kyphoplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2013; 79: 565-571.
17. GIANNOTTI S, CARMASSI F, BOTTAI V, DELL'OSSO G, GAZZARRI F, GUIDO G. Comparison of 50 vertebral compression fractures treated with surgical (kyphoplasty) or non surgical approach. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 2012; 9: 184-186.
18. LEDLIE JT, RENFRO M. Balloon kyphoplasty: One-year outcomes in vertebral body height restoration, chronic pain, and activity levels. J Neurosurg 2003; 98(1 Suppl): 36-42.
19. VAN MEIRHAEGHE J, BASTIAN L, BOONEN S, RANSTAM J, TILLMAN JB, WARDLAW D; ON BEHALF OF THE FREE INVESTIGATORS. A Randomized trial of balloon kyphoplasty and non-surgical management for treating acute vertebral compression fractures: Vertebral body kyphosis correction and surgical parameters. Spine 2013; 38: 971-983.
20. VOGGENREITER G. Balloon kyphoplasty is effective in deformity correction of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine 2005; 30: 2806-2812.
21. PRADHAN BB, BAE HW, KROPF MA, PATEL VV, DELAMARTER RB. Kyphoplasty reduction of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: Correction of local kyphosis versus overall sagittal alignment. Spine 2006; 31: 435-441.
22. TOLBA R, BOLASH RB, SHROLL J, COSTANDI S, DALTON JE, Sanghvi C, Mekhail N. Kyphoplasty increases vertebral height, decreases both pain score and opiate requirements while improving functional status. Pain Pract 2014; 14: E91-97.