Lineage-specific enhancers activate self-renewal genes in macrophages and embryonic stem cells

Science

Volumn 351, Issue 6274, 2016, Pages

  Soucie, Erinn L ^a,b,c,d   Weng, Ziming ^e   Geirsdóttir, Laufey ^a,b,c   Molawi, Kaaweh ^a,b,c,f   Maurizio, Julien ^a,b,c   Fenouil, Romain ^a,b,c   Mossadegh Keller, Noushine ^a,b,c   Gimenez, Gregory ^a,b,c   Vanhille, Laurent ^a,b,c   Beniazza, Meryam ^a,b,c   Favret, Jeremy ^a,b,c   Berruyer, Carole ^a,b,c   Perrin, Pierre ^a,b,c   Hacohen, Nir ^g   Andrau, J C ^a,b,c,h   Ferrier, Pierre ^a,b,c   Dubreuil, Patrice ^d   Sidow, Arend ^e,i   Sieweke, Michael H ^a,b,c,f  

^a CENTRE D IMMUNOLOGIE DE MARSEILLE LUMINY   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^e STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f MAX DELBRÜCK CENTER FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE   (Germany)

^g BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD   (United States)

^h INSTITUT DE GÉNÉTIQUE MOLÉCULAIRE DE MONTPELLIER   (France)

ⁱ STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACYLTRANSFERASE; COLONY STIMULATING FACTOR 1; KRUPPEL LIKE FACTOR 2; KRUPPEL LIKE FACTOR 4; RECOMBINANT COLONY STIMULATING FACTOR 1; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR C MAF; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR MAF; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR MAFB; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR PU 1; MAF PROTEIN, MOUSE; MAFB PROTEIN, MOUSE;

CELLS AND CELL COMPONENTS; GENE EXPRESSION; MATURATION; PROTEIN; RODENT;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CELL ACTIVATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SPECIFICITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOWN REGULATION; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; ENHANCER REGION; EPIGENETICS; GENE; GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; HISTONE MODIFICATION; IN VIVO STUDY; LUNG ALVEOLUS MACROPHAGE; MACROPHAGE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SEL FRENEWAL GENE; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; STEM CELL SELF-RENEWAL; ANIMAL; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CYTOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION;

MUS;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS, CULTURED; DOWN-REGULATION; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; ENHANCER ELEMENTS, GENETIC; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; MACROPHAGES; MAFB TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; MICE; PROTO-ONCOGENE PROTEINS C-MAF; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVATION;

EID: 84958191207     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.aad5510     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. H2 inflammation. Science 332, 1284-1288 (2011). pmid: 21566158
2. C. Schulz et al., A lineage of myeloid cells independent of Myb and hematopoietic stem cells. Science 336,86-90 (2012). doi: 10.1126/science.1219179; pmid: 22442384
3. S. Yona et al., Fate mapping reveals origins and dynamics of monocytes and tissue macrophages under homeostasis. Immunity 38, 79-91 (2013). pmid: 23273845
4. D. Hashimoto et al., Tissue-resident macrophages self-maintain locally throughout adult life with minimal contribution from circulating monocytes. Immunity 38, 792-804 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.04.004; pmid: 23601688
5. M. H. Sieweke, J. E. Allen, Beyond stem cells: Self-renewal of differentiated macrophages. Science 342, 1242974 (2013). doi: 10.1126/science.1242974; pmid: 24264994
6. E. L. Gautier et al., Gene-expression profiles and transcriptional regulatory pathways that underlie the identity and diversity of mouse tissue macrophages. Nat. Immunol. 13, 1118-1128 (2012).pmid: 23023392
7. A. Aziz, E. Soucie, S. Sarrazin, M. H. Sieweke, MafB/c-Maf deficiency enables self-renewal of differentiated functional macrophages. Science 326, 867-871 (2009). doi: 10.1126/science.1176056; pmid: 19892988
8. G. Fejer et al., Nontransformed, GM-CSF-dependent macrophage lines are a unique model to study tissue macrophage functions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, E2191-E2198 (2013). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302877110; pmid: 23708119
9. N. D. Heintzman et al., Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression. Nature 459, 108-112 (2009). doi: 10.1038/nature07829; pmid: 19295514
10. G. Natoli, Maintaining cell identity through global control of genomic organization. Immunity 33, 12-24 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.07.006; pmid: 20643336
11. S. Ghisletti et al., Identification and characterization of enhancers controlling the inflammatory gene expression program in macrophages. Immunity 32, 317-328 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.02.008; pmid: 20206554
12. S. Heinz et al., Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38, 576-589 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.004; pmid: 20513432
13. M. P. Creyghton et al., Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 21931-21936 (2010). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016071107; pmid: 21106759
14. G. Natoli, J. C. Andrau, Noncoding transcription at enhancers: General principles and functional models. Annu. Rev. Genet. 46, 1-19 (2012). doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155459; pmid: 22905871
15. D. Gosselin et al., Environment drives selection and function of enhancers controlling tissue-specific macrophage identities. Cell 159, 1327-1340 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.023; pmid: 25480297
16. Y. Lavin et al., Tissue-resident macrophage enhancer landscapes are shaped by the local microenvironment. Cell 159, 1312-1326 (2014). pmid: 25480296
17. R. Ostuni et al., Latent enhancers activated by stimulation in differentiated cells. Cell 152, 157-171 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.018; pmid: 23332752
18. A. Visel et al., ChIP-seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers. Nature 457, 854-858 (2009). doi: 10.1038/nature07730; pmid: 19212405
19. A. Rada-Iglesias et al., A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans. Nature 470, 279-283 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nature09692; pmid: 21160473
20. C. Y. McLean et al., GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 495-501 (2010). doi: 10.1038/nbt.1630; pmid: 20436461
21. D. J. Wong et al., Module map of stem cell genes guides creation of epithelial cancer stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2, 333-344 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.02.009; pmid: 18397753
22. N. Ivanova et al., Dissecting self-renewal in stem cells with RNA interference. Nature 442, 533-538 (2006). doi: 10.1038/nature04915; pmid: 16767105
23. J. Z. Zhang et al., Screening for genes essential for mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal using a subtractive RNA interference library. Stem Cells 24, 2661-2668 (2006). doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0017; pmid: 16960129
24. M. Pritsker, N. R. Ford, H. T. Jenq, I. R. Lemischka, Genomewide gain-of-function genetic screen identifies functionally active genes in mouse embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 6946-6951 (2006). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509861103; pmid: 16621925
25. J. Hall et al., Oct4 and LIF/Stat3 additively induce Krüppel factors to sustain embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Cell Stem Cell 5, 597-609 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.11.003; pmid: 19951688
26. J. Jiang et al., A core Klf circuitry regulates self-renewal of embryonic stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 353-360 (2008). doi: 10.1038/ncb1698; pmid: 18264089
27. A. Gaspar-Maia et al., Chd1 regulates open chromatin and pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature 460, 863-868 (2009).pmid: 19587682
28. G. Hu et al., A genome-wide RNAi screen identifies a new transcriptional module required for self-renewal. Genes Dev. 23, 837-848 (2009). doi: 10.1101/gad.1769609; pmid: 19339689
29. L. Ding et al., A genome-scale RNAi screen for Oct4 modulators defines a role of the Paf1 complex for embryonic stem cell identity. Cell Stem Cell 4, 403-415 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.03.009; pmid: 19345177
30. B. D. Macarthur, A. Ma'ayan, I. R. Lemischka, Systems biology of stem cell fate and cellular reprogramming. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 672-681 (2009). pmid: 19738627
31. I. Amit et al., Unbiased reconstruction of a mammalian transcriptional network mediating pathogen responses. Science 326, 257-263 (2009). doi: 10.1126/science.1179050; pmid: 19729616
32. Y. Bakri et al., Balance of MafB and PU.1 specifies alternative macrophage or dendritic cell fate. Blood 105, 2707-2716 (2005). doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1448; pmid: 15598817
33. R. Gentek, K. Molawi, M. H. Sieweke, Tissue macrophage identity and self-renewal. Immunol. Rev. 262, 56-73 (2014). doi: 10.1111/imr.12224; pmid: 25319327
34. L. C. Davies et al., Distinct bone marrow-derived and tissue-resident macrophage lineages proliferate at key stages during inflammation. Nat. Commun. 4, 1886 (2013). doi: 10.1038/ncomms2877; pmid: 23695680
35. S. J. Jenkins et al., IL-4 directly signals tissue-resident macrophages to proliferate beyond homeostatic levels controlled by CSF-1. J. Exp. Med. 210, 2477-2491 (2013). doi: 10.1084/jem.20121999; pmid: 24101381
36. J. A. Hamilton, G. A. Whitty, I. Kola, P. J. Hertzog, Endogenous IFN-alpha beta suppresses colony-stimulating factor (CSF)-1-stimulated macrophage DNA synthesis and mediates inhibitory effects of lipopolysaccharide and TNF-alpha. J. Immunol. 156, 2553-2557 (1996). pmid: 8786318
37. H. Motohashi, K. Igarashi, MafB as a type I interferon rheostat. Nat. Immunol. 11, 695-696 (2010). doi: 10.1038/ni0810-695; pmid: 20644578
38. A. Valouev et al., Genome-wide analysis of transcription factor binding sites based on ChIP-Seq data. Nat. Methods 5, 829-834 (2008). doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1246; pmid: 19160518
39. A. J. Saldanha, Java Treeview-Extensible visualization of microarray data. Bioinformatics 20, 3246-3248 (2004). doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth349; pmid: 15180930
40. J. A. Hartigan, M. A. Wong, A K-means clustering algorithm. J. R. Stat. Soc. C Appl. Stat. 28, 100-108 (1979).