Membrane photoreactor treatment of 1,4-dioxane-containing textile wastewater effluent: Performance, modeling, and fouling control

Water Research

Volumn 86, Issue , 2015, Pages 58-65

  Lee, Ki Chang ^a   Beak, Ha Ju ^a   Choo, Kwang Ho ^b  

^a Province of Gyeongsangbuk do   (South Korea)

^b Kyungpook National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

1,4 Dioxane; Fouling; Membrane reactor; Photocatalysis; Textile wastewater

Indexed keywords

BIOREACTORS; DEGRADATION; EFFLUENT TREATMENT; EFFLUENTS; ENERGY CONSERVATION; MEMBRANE FOULING; MEMBRANES; PH; PHOTOCATALYSIS; POTABLE WATER; RADIATION EFFECTS; REACTION KINETICS; TEXTILES; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

1,4-DIOXANE; HYDRAULIC RESIDENCE TIME; MEMBRANE PHOTOREACTOR; MEMBRANE REACTOR; PARTICULATE MATTER; PERFORMANCE CONTROL; PRESSURE BUILD UP; TEXTILE WASTEWATER; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES; WASTEWATER EFFLUENTS;

TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

DIOXANE; DRINKING WATER; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; 1,4-DIOXANE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; DIOXANE DERIVATIVE; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; TITANIUM;

CATALYSIS; EFFLUENT; FOULING; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; MEMBRANE; ORGANIC COMPOUND; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PERMEABILITY; PHOTODEGRADATION; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; REACTION KINETICS; SOLAR RADIATION; TITANIUM; WASTE TREATMENT; WASTEWATER;

ALKALINITY; ARTICLE; BIOFOULING; CATALYST; COLLOID; CONTROLLED STUDY; EFFLUENT; FOULING CONTROL; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; MEMBRANE REACTOR; PARTICULATE MATTER; PHOTOCATALYSIS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUNLIGHT; TEXTILE; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; WASTE WATER; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BIOREACTOR; CATALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; PHOTOLYSIS; PROCEDURES; RADIATION RESPONSE; SEWAGE; TEXTILE INDUSTRY; THEORETICAL MODEL; WATER MANAGEMENT;

BIOFOULING; BIOREACTORS; CATALYSIS; DIOXANES; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHOTOLYSIS; SUNLIGHT; TEXTILE INDUSTRY; TITANIUM; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 84958161140     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: 18792448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.017     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Abid M., Ebrahim M., Nafi O., Hussain L., Maneual N., Sameer A. Designing and operating a pilot plant for purification of industrial wastewater from toxic organic compounds by utilizing solar energy. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2014, 31(7):1194-1203.
2. Acero J., Benitez F.J., Real F., Rodriguez E. Elimination of selected emerging contaminants by the combination of membrane filtration and chemical oxidation processes. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2015, 226(5):1-14.
3. Adams C.D., Scanlan P.A., Secrist N.D. Oxidation and biodegradability enhancement of 1, 4-dioxane using hydrogen peroxide and ozone. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1994, 28(11):1812-1818.
4. 2 powder films for the photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants in water. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2004, 47(2):73-84.
5. Barndõk H., Cortijo L., Hermosilla D., Negro C., Blanco Á. Removal of 1,4-dioxane from industrial wastewaters: routes of decomposition under different operational conditions to determine the ozone oxidation capacity. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 280(0):340-347.
6. Barndõk H., Hermosilla D., Cortijo L., Torres E., Blanco Á. Electrooxidation of industrial wastewater containing 1,4-dioxane in the presence of different salts. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21(8):5701-5712.
7. Beckett M.A., Hua I. Enhanced sonochemical decomposition of 1,4-dioxane by ferrous iron. Water Res. 2003, 37(10):2372-2376.
8. 2 photocatalysis process. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 275(1-2):202-211.
9. Chitra S., Paramasivan K., Cheralathan M., Sinha P.K. Degradation of 1, 4-dioxane using advanced oxidation processes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2012, 19(3):871-878.
10. Choo K.-H., Chang D.-I., Park K.-W., Kim M.-H. Use of an integrated photocatalysis/hollow fiber microfiltration system for the removal of trichloroethylene in water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 152(1):183-190.
11. Choo K.-H., Tao R., Kim M.-J. Use of a photocatalytic membrane reactor for the removal of natural organic matter in water: effect of photoinduced desorption and ferrihydrite adsorption. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 322(2):368-374.
12. 2/UV processes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 146(3):496-501.
13. Cui X., Choo K.-H. Natural organic matter removal and fouling control in low-pressure membrane filtration for water treatment. Environ. Eng. Res. 2014, 19(1):1-8.
14. Fu J., Ji M., Wang Z., Jin L., An D. A new submerged membrane photocatalysis reactor (SMPR) for fulvic acid removal using a nano-structured photocatalyst. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 131(1-3):238-242.
15. 2 hybrid photocatalytic membrane with hierarchical porosity: fabrication, characterizations and performances. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 228(0):1030-1039.
16. 2 photocatalytic membrane with hierarchical architecture: photocatalytic and anti-bacterial activities. Water Res. 2014, 59(0):207-218.
17. Jo W.-K., Lee J.Y. Degradation of chlorinated hydrocarbons via a light-emitting diode derived photocatalyst. Environ. Eng. Res. 2013, 18(1):21-28.
18. Kim M.-J., Choo K.-H., Park H.-S. Photocatalytic degradation of seawater organic matter using a submerged membrane reactor. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-Chem. 2010, 216(2-3):215-220.
19. Kishimoto N., Nakagawa T., Asano M., Abe M., Yamada M., Ono Y. Ozonation combined with electrolysis of 1,4-dioxane using a two-compartment electrolytic flow cell with solid electrolyte. Water Res. 2008, 42(1-2):379-385.
20. Korean Ministry of Environment Standards and Official Test Methods of Water Quality 2011, Korean Ministry of Environment, Seoul, Korea.
21. Kwon S.C., Kim J.Y., Yoon S.M., Bae W., Kang K.S., Rhee Y.W. Treatment characteristic of 1,4-dioxane by ozone-based advanced oxidation processes. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2012, 18(6):1951-1955.
22. Lam S.W., Hermawan M., Coleman H.M., Fisher K., Amal R. The role of copper(II) ions in the photocatalytic oxidation of 1,4-dioxane. J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem. 2007, 278(1-2):152-159.
23. Lazarova V., Bahri A. Water Reuse for Irrigation: Agriculture, Landscapes, and Turf Grass 2004, CRC Press.
24. Lee I.-S., Sim W.-J., Kim C.-W., Chang Y.-S., Oh J.-E. Characteristic occurrence patterns of micropollutants and their removal efficiencies in industrial wastewater treatment plants. J. Environ. Monit. 2011, 13(2):391-397.
25. 2 photocatalysis with coagulation and flocculation for 1,4-dioxane removal in drinking water treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 231:227-235.
26. 2 particles in coagulation-photocatalysis hybrid water treatment. Chem. Eng. Process 2014, 78:11-16.
27. 2 photocatalysts in drinking water treatment. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40(7):1712-1719.
28. 2/AC composites for synergistic adsorption-photocatalysis processes: present challenges and further developments for water treatment and reclamation. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 41(13):1173-1230.
29. Miralles-Cuevas S., Oller I., Ruiz Aguirre A., Sánchez Pérez J.A., Malato Rodríguez S. Removal of pharmaceuticals at microg L-1 by combined nanofiltration and mild solar photo-Fenton. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 239(0):68-74.
30. Molinari R., Borgese M., Drioli E., Palmisano L., Schiavello M. Hybrid processes coupling photocatalysis and membranes for degradation of organic pollutants in water. Catal. Today 2002, 75(1-4):77-85.
31. Moravia W.G., Amaral M.C.S., Lange L.C. Evaluation of landfill leachate treatment by advanced oxidative process by Fenton's reagent combined with membrane separation system. Waste Manag. 2013, 33(1):89-101.
32. Mozia S. Photocatalytic membrane reactors (PMRs) in water and wastewater treatment. A review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 73(2):71-91.
33. Mozia S., Tomaszewska M., Morawski A.W. A new photocatalytic membrane reactor (PMR) for removal of azo-dye Acid Red 18 from water. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2005, 59(1-2):131-137.
34. Mozia S., Tomaszewska M., Morawski A.W. Removal of azo-dye Acid Red 18 in two hybrid membrane systems employing a photodegradation process. Desalination 2006, 198(1-3):183-190.
35. 2 powder. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-Chem. 2004, 167(2-3):75-79.
36. Papageorgiou S.K., Katsaros F.K., Favvas E.P., Romanos G.E., Athanasekou C.P., Beltsios K.G., Tzialla O.I., Falaras P. Alginate fibers as photocatalyst immobilizing agents applied in hybrid photocatalytic/ultrafiltration water treatment processes. Water Res. 2012, 46(6):1858-1872.
37. Park H., Choo K.-H., Park H.-S., Choi J., Hoffmann M.R. Electrochemical oxidation and microfiltration of municipal wastewater with simultaneous hydrogen production: influence of organic and particulate matter. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 215-216(0):802-810.
38. Rice J., Westerhoff P. Spatial and temporal variation in de facto wastewater reuse in drinking water systems across the U.S.A. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 49(2):982-989.
39. Rietman B., Verliefde A. Reverse osmosis followed by activated carbon filtration for efficient removal of organic micropollutants from river bank filtrate. Water Sci. Technol. 2010, 61(10):2603-2610.
40. Rojviroon O., Rojviroon T., Sirivithayapakorn S. Study of COD removal efficiency from synthetic wastewater by photocatalytic process. Environ. Eng. Res. 2014, 19(3):255-259.
41. Sarasidis V.C., Patsios S.I., Karabelas A.J. A hybrid photocatalysis-ultrafiltration continuous process: the case of polysaccharide degradation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 80(1):73-80.
42. Simonich S.M., Sun P., Casteel K., Dyer S., Wernery D., Garber K., Carr G., Federle T. Probabilistic analysis of risks to us drinking water intakes from 1,4-dioxane in domestic wastewater treatment plant effluents. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2013, 9(4):554-559.
43. Son H.-S., Choi S.-B., Khan E., Zoh K.-D. Removal of 1,4-dioxane from water using sonication: effect of adding oxidants on the degradation kinetics. Water Res. 2006, 40(4):692-698.
44. 0) and UV light. Water Res. 2009, 43(5):1457-1463.
45. Stefan M.I., Bolton J.R. Mechanism of the degradation of 1,4-dioxane in dilute aqueous solution using the UV/hydrogen peroxide process. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32(11):1588-1595.
46. Stepien D.K., Diehl P., Helm J., Thoms A., Püttmann W. Fate of 1,4-dioxane in the aquatic environment: from sewage to drinking water. Water Res. 2014, 48:406-419.
47. 2-coated membrane under UV irradiation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 323(1):112-119.
48. Vescovi T., Coleman H.M., Amal R. The effect of pH on UV-based advanced oxidation technologies - 1,4-Dioxane degradation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 182(1-3):75-79.
49. 2 separation. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 215-216(0):240-251.
50. Willmott C.J., Matsuura K. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Clim. Res. 2005, 30(1):79-85.
51. World Health Organization Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality: First Addendum to Volume 1, Recommendations 2006, World Health Organization.
52. Yanagida S., Nakajima A., Kameshima Y., Okada K. Effect of applying voltage on photocatalytic destruction of 1,4-dioxane in aqueous system. Catal. Commun. 2006, 7(12):1042-1046.
53. Yao P., Choo K.-H., Kim M.-H. A hybridized photocatalysis-microfiltration system with iron oxide-coated membranes for the removal of natural organic matter in water treatment: effects of iron oxide layers and colloids. Water Res. 2009, 43(17):4238-4248.
54. Yasar A., Khalil S., Tabinda A., Malik A. Comparison of cost and treatment efficiency of solar assisted advance oxidation processes for textile dye bath effluent. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2013, 30(1):131-138.
55. Zenker M.J., Borden R.C., Barlaz M.A. Occurrence and treatment of 1,4-dioxane in aqueous environments. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2003, 20(5):423-432.