A comprehensive study of the delay vector variance method for quantification of nonlinearity in dynamical systems

Royal Society Open Science

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Jaksic, V ^a   Mandic, D P ^b   Ryan, K ^c   Basu, B ^c   Pakrashi, V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Benchmarking; Delay vector variance; Signal nonlinearity; Structural dynamics; Wind turbine blade

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958092442     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20545703     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.150493     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Farrar CR, Worden K. 2012 Structural health monitoring: amachine learning perspective. New York, NY: JohnWiley & Sons.
2. Pakrashi V, Kelly J, Harkin J, Farrell A. 2013 Hurst exponent footprints from activities on a large structural system. Physica A 392, 1803-1817. (doi: 10. 1016/j. physa. 2012. 11. 004).
3. ülker-Kaustell M, Karoumi R. 2011 Application of the continuous wavelet transform on the free vibrations of a steel-concrete composite railway bridge. Eng. Struct. 33, 911-919. (doi: 10. 1016/j. engstruct. 2010. 12. 012).
4. Rainieri C, Fabbrocino G, Cosenza E. 2011 Integrated seismic early warning and structural health monitoring of critical civil infrastructures in seismically prone areas. Struct. Health Monit. 10, 291-308. (doi: 10. 1177/1475921710373296).
5. Rainieri C, Fabbrocino G. 2015 Development and validation of an automated operational modal analysis algorithm for vibration-based monitoring and tensile load estimation. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 60, 512-534. (doi: 10. 1016/j. ymssp. 2015. 01. 019).
6. Sierra-Pérez J, Torres-Arredondo MA, Güemes A. 2016 Damage and nonlinearities detection in wind turbine blades based on strain field pattern recognition. FBGs, OBR and strain gauges comparison. Compos. Struct. 135, 156-166. (doi: 10. 1016/j. compstruct. 2015. 08. 137).
7. Gul M, Catbas FN. 2009 Statistical pattern recognition for Structural Health Monitoring using time series modeling: theory and experimental verifications. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 23, 2192-2204. (doi: 10. 1016/j. ymssp. 2009. 02. 013).
8. Jaksic V, O' Connor A, Pakrashi V. 2014 Damage detection and calibration from beam-moving oscillator interaction employing surface roughness. J. Sound Vibr. 333, 3917-3930. (doi: 10. 1016/ j. jsv. 2014. 04. 009).
9. Hou S, Li Y, Zhao S. 2007 Detecting the nonlinearity in time series from continuous dynamic systems based on delay vector variance method. Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 3, 258-263.
10. Schreiber T, Schmitz A. 2000 Surrogate time series. Physica D 142, 346-382. (doi: 10. 1016/s0167-2789(00)00043-9).
11. Theiler J, Eubank S, Longtin A, Galdrikian B, Doyne Farmer J. 1992 Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data. Physica D 58, 77-94. (doi: 10. 1016/0167-2789(92)90102-S).
12. Nakamura T, Small M, Hirata Y. 2006 Testing for nonlinearity in irregular fluctuations with long-term trends. Phys. Rev. E 74, 026205. (doi: 10. 1103/PhysRevE. 74. 026205).
13. Zhao Y, Sun J, Small M. 2008 Evidence consistent with deterministic chaos in human cardiac data: surrogate and nonlinear dynamical modeling. Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 18, 141-160. (doi: 10. 1142/ S0218127408020197).
14. Rios RA, Small M, deMello RF. 2015 Testing for linear and nonlinear Gaussian processes in nonstationary time series. Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 25, 1550013. (doi: 10. 1142/S0218127415500133).
15. Rapp PE, Albano AM, Zimmerman ID, Jiménez-Montaño MA. 1994 Phase-randomized surrogates can produce spurious identifications of non-random structure. Phys. Lett. A 192, 27-33. (doi: 10. 1016/0375-9601(94)91010-3).
16. Hegger R, Kantz H, Schreiber T. 1999 Practical implementation of nonlinear time series methods: the TISEAN package. Chaos 9, 413-433. (doi: 10. 1063/1. 166424).
17. Gautama T, Mandic DP, Hulle MMV. 2004 The delay vector variance method for detecting determinism and nonlinearity in time series. Physica D 190, 167-176. (doi: 10. 1016/j. physd. 2003. 11. 001).
18. Casdagli M. 1992 Chaos and deterministic versus stochastic non-linear modelling. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 54, 303-328. (doi: 10. 2307/2346130).
19. Schreiber T, Schmitz A. 1997 Discrimination power of measures for nonlinearity in a time series. Phys. Rev. E 55, 5443. (doi: 10. 1103/PhysRevE. 55. 5443).
20. Kaplan DT. 1994 Exceptional events as evidence for determinism. Physica D 73, 38-48. (doi: 10. 1016/0167-2789(94)90224-0).
21. Kennel MB, Brown R, Abarbanel HDI. 1992 Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometrical construction. Phys. Rev. A 45, 3403-3411. (doi: 10. 1103/PhysRevA. 45. 3403).
22. Takens F. 1981 Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
23. Eckmann J, Kamphorst SO, Ruelle D. 1995 Recurrence plots of dynamical systems. World Sci. Ser. Nonlinear Sci. Ser. A 16, 441-446. (doi: 10. 1142/9789812833709_0030).
24. Gautama T, Mandic DP, Hulle MMV. 2003 Indications of nonlinear structures in brain electrical activity. Phys. Rev. E 67, 046204. (doi: 10. 1103/PhysRevE. 67. 046204).
25. Gautama T, Mandic DP, Hulle MMV. 2003 Signal nonlinearity in fMRI: a comparison between BOLD and MION. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 22, 636-644. (doi: 10. 1109/TMI. 2003. 812248).
26. Mandic DP, Chen M, Gautama T, Van Hulle MM, Constantinides A. 2008 On the characterization of the deterministic/stochastic and linear/nonlinear nature of time series. Proc. R. Soc. A 464, 1141-1160. (doi: 10. 1098/rspa. 2007. 0154).
27. Kuntamalla S, Reddy RGL. 2011 The effect of aging on nonlinearity and stochastic nature of heart rate variability signal computed using delay vector variance method. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 14, 40-44. (doi: 10. 5120/1837-2470).
28. Gautama T, Hulle MMV, Mandic DP. 2004 On the characterisation of the deterministic/stochastic and linear/nonlinear nature of time series. Technical Report DPM-04-05. Imperial College London.
29. Schreiber T. 1999 Interdisciplinary application of nonlinear time series methods. Phys. Rep. 308, 1-64. (doi: 10. 1016/S0370-1573(98)000 35-0).
30. Hongying H, Fuliang Y. 2009 Diesel engine fault information acquisition based on delay vector variance method. In Second Int. Symp. Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling, 2009. KAM '09. Second Int. 30 Nov-1 Dec 2009, Wuhan, China, pp. 199-202. IEEE. (doi: 10. 1109/KAM. 2009. 124).
31. Jaksic V, O'Shea R, Cahill P, Murphy J, Mandic DP, Pakrashi V. 2015 Dynamic response signatures of a scaled model platform for floating wind turbines in an ocean wave basin. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 373, 20140078. (doi: 10. 1098/rsta. 2014. 0078).
32. Jaksic V, Wright CS, Murphy J, Afeef C, Ali SF, Mandic DP, Pakrashi V. 2015 Dynamic response mitigation of floating wind turbine platforms using tuned liquid column dampers. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 373, 20140079. (doi: 10. 1098/rsta. 2014. 0079).
33. Jaksic V, Wright C, Mandic DP, Murphy J, Pakrashi V. 2015 A delay vector variance based marker for an output-only assessment of structural changes in tension leg platforms. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 628, 012059. (doi: 10. 1088/1742-6596/628/1/012059).
34. Jaksic V, Mandic DP, Karoumi R, Basu B, Pakrashi V. 2015 Estimation of nonlinearities from pseudodynamic and dynamic responses of bridge structures using the Delay Vector Variance method. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 441, 100-120. (doi: 10. 1016/ j. physa. 2015. 08. 026).
35. Khosrow-Pour M. 2008 Encyclopedia of information science and technology. Hershey PA: IGI Global.
36. Mandic DP, Chambers JA. 2001 Recurrent neural networks for prediction: learning algorithms, architectures and stability. NewYork, NY: JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd.
37. Xu Z-L, Wang Y-Y, Zhou J-L, He P-Y. 2007 Detecting the nonlinear determinism of a room acoustic system using surrogates. J. Sichuan Univ. 39, 155-158.
38. Jianjun Y, Haijun W, Chunming X, YiqinW, Fufeng L, Rui G, Tiancai M. 2008 Nonlinear Analysis in TCM acoustic diagnosis using delay vector variance. In The 2nd Int. Conf. Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (ICBBE 2008), 16-18 May 2008, Shanghai, China, pp. 2099-2102. IEEE. (doi: 10. 1109/icbbe. 2008. 854).
39. Mandic DP. 2010 A Delay Vector Variance toolbox for MATLAB. The code is provided under the GNU General Public License (GPL). Available from: http: //www. commsp. ee. ic. ac. uk/∼mandic/dvv. htm.
40. Gautama T, Mandic DP, Van Hulle MM. 2003 A differential entropy based method for determining the optimal embedding parameters of a signal. In IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '03), 6-10 April 2003, Hong Kong. Vol. 26, pp. VI29-VI32. IEEE. (doi: 10. 1109/icassp. 2003. 1201610).
41. Rytter A. 1993 Vibrational based inspection of civil engineering structures. PhD thesis, Aalborg University, Denmark.