Building annotated resources for automatic text summarization

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2002

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 1780-1786

  Oràsan, Constantin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANNOTATION SCHEME; ANNOTATION TOOL; AUTOMATIC TEXT SUMMARIZATION;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84958087273     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. David Day, John Aberdeen, Sasha Caskey, Lynette Hirschman, Patricia Robinson, and Marc Vilain. 1998.Alembic workbench corpus development tool. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Language Resource&Evaluation, pages 1021-1028, May.
2. H. P. Edmunson. 1969. New methods in automatic extracting. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 16(2):264-285, April.
3. Hongyan Jing and Kathleen R. McKeown. 1999. The decomposition of human-written summary sentences. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'99), pages 129-136, University of Berkeley, CA, August.
4. Julian Kupiec, Jan Pederson, and Francine Chen. 1995. A trainable document summarizer. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM/SIGIR Annual Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 68 -73, Seattle.
5. H. P. Luhn. 1958. The automatic creation of literature abstracts. IBM Journal of research and development, 2(2):159-165.
6. Daniel Marcu. 1997. From discourse structures to text summaries. In I. Mani and M. Maybury, editors, Proceedings of the ACL/EACL '97 Workshop on Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization, pages 82 - 88, Madrid, Spain. ACL.
7. Daniel Marcu. 1999. The automatic construction of largescale corpora for summarization research. In The 22nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'99), pages 137-144, Berkeley, CA, August.
8. Constantin Ořasan. 2000. CLinkA a coreferential links annotator. In Proceedings of LREC'2000, pages 491-496, Athens, Greece.
9. Constantin Ořasan. 2001. Patterns in scientific abstracts. In Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2001 Conference, pages 433-443, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK, March.
10. Chris D. Paice and G.D. Husk. 1987. Towards the automatic recognition of anaphoric features in english text: The impersonal pronoun it. Computer Speech and Language, 2:109-132.
11. Chris D. Paice. 1981. The automatic generation of literature abstracts: An approach based on the identification of self-indicating phrases. In R. N. Oddy, C. J. Rijsbergen, and P. W. Williams, editors, Information Retrieval Research, pages 172-191. London: Butterworths.
12. F. Salanger-Meyer. 1990. Discoursal flaws in medical english abstracts: A genre analysis per research- And text-type. Text, 10(4):365-384.
13. Gerard Salton, James Allan, and Amit Singhal. 1996. Automatic text decomposition and structuring. Information Procssing & Management, 32(2):127-138.
14. Simone Teufel and Marc Moens. 1997. Sentence extraction as a classification task. In Proceedings of the ACL'97/EACL'97 workshop on Intelligent Scallable Text Summarization, pages 58 - 59, Madrid, Spain, July 11.
15. Benjamin K. Tsou, Hing-Lung Lin, and Tom B. Y. Lan. 1997. A comparative study of human efforts in textual summarization. In Proceedings of PACLING '97, Meisei University, Tokyo, Japan, September 2-5.
16. Klaus Zechner. 1996. Fast generation of abstracts from general domain text corpora by extracting relevant sentences. In COLING - 96, The International Conference on Computational Linguistics, volume 1, pages 986-989, Center for Sprogteknologi, Copenhagen, Denmark, August.