Developing a core set of patient-reported outcomes in pancreatic cancer: A Delphi survey

European Journal of Cancer

Volumn 57, Issue , 2016, Pages 68-77

  Gerritsen, Arja ^a,b   Jacobs, Marc ^a   Henselmans, Inge ^a   Van Hattum, Jons ^a   Efficace, Fabio ^c   Creemers, Geert Jan ^d   De Hingh, Ignace H ^d   Koopman, Miriam ^b   Molenaar, I Quintus ^b   Wilmink, Hanneke W ^a   Busch, Olivier R ^a   Besselink, Marc G ^a   Van Laarhoven, Hanneke W ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c Data Center and Health Outcomes Research Unit   (Italy)

^d CATHARINA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Delphi survey; Pancreatic cancer; Patient reported outcomes; Personalized medicine; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

PANCREAS ENZYME;

APPETITE; ARTICLE; CANCER PALLIATIVE THERAPY; CANCER REGISTRY; CAREGIVER; COPING BEHAVIOR; DEFECATION; DELPHI STUDY; ENZYME REPLACEMENT; FATIGUE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANCREAS CANCER; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RATING SCALE; SELF REPORT; WEIGHT CHANGE; AGED; COMPLICATION; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PALLIATIVE THERAPY; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

AGED; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PALLIATIVE CARE; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRECISION MEDICINE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84958064069     PISSN: 09598049     EISSN: 18790852     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. M. Quaresma, M.P. Coleman, and B. Rachet 40-year trends in an index of survival for all cancers combined and survival adjusted for age and sex for each cancer in England and Wales, 1971-2011: A population-based study Lancet 2014 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61396-9
2. American Cancer Society Cancer facts & figures 2014 2014 Atlanta, Georgia
3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Guidance for industry patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims 2009 Silver Spring, Maryland
4. J. Chen, L. Ou, and S.J. Hollis A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting BMC Health Serv Res 13 2013 211 10.1186/1472-6963-13-211
5. G. Kotronoulas, N. Kearney, R. Maguire, A. Harrow, D. Di Domenico, S. Croy, and et al. What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials J Clin Oncol 32 2014 1480 1501 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5948
6. R.C. Macefield, M. Jacobs, I.J. Korfage, J. Nicklin, R.N. Whistance, S.T. Brookes, and et al. Developing core outcomes sets: Methods for identifying and including patient-reported outcomes (PROs) Trials 15 2014 49 10.1186/1745-6215-15-49
7. P.L. Williams, and C. Webb The Delphi technique: A methodological discussion J Adv Nurs 19 1994 180 186
8. J. de Meyrick The Delphi method and health research Health Educ 103 2003 7 16 10.1108/09654280310459112
9. S. Sandford, and C. Hsu The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus Pract Assessment, Res Eval 12 2007 1 8
10. C.A. Bellera, M. Pulido, S. Gourgou, L. Collette, A. Doussau, A. Kramar, and et al. Protocol of the Definition for the Assessment of Time-to-event Endpoints in CANcer trials (DATECAN) project: Formal consensus method for the development of guidelines for standardised time-to-event endpoints' definitions in cancer clinical trials Eur J Cancer 49 2013 769 781 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.09.035
11. F. Bonnetain, B. Bonsing, T. Conroy, A. Dousseau, B. Glimelius, K. Haustermans, and et al. Guidelines for time-to-event end-point definitions in trials for pancreatic cancer. Results of the DATECAN initiative (Definition for the Assessment of Time-to-event End-points in CANcer trials) Eur J Cancer 50 2014 2983 2993 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.07.011
12. F. Efficace, J. Rees, P. Fayers, A. Pusic, M. Taphoorn, E. Greimel, and et al. Overcoming barriers to the implementation of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials: The PROMOTION Registry Health Qual Life Outcomes 12 2014 86 10.1186/1477-7525-12-86
13. I.P. Sinha, R.L. Smyth, and P.R. Williamson Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: Recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies PLoS Med 8 2011 e1000393 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000393
14. FACIT.org. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hep n.d. http://www.facit.org/FACITOrg/Questionnaires [accessed 12.03.14].
15. EORTC Quality of Life Department. EORTC QLQ-C30 n.d. http://groups.eortc.be/qol/eortc-qlq-c30 [accessed 12.03.14].
16. EORTC Quality of Life Department. EORTC QLQ-PAN26 n.d. http://groups.eortc.be/qol/pancreatic-cancer-eortc-qlq-pan26 [accessed 12.03.14].
17. W.O. Spitzer, A.J. Dobson, J. Hall, E. Chesterman, J. Levi, R. Shepherd, and et al. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: A concise QL-index for use by physicians J Chronic Dis 34 1981 585 597
18. B. Fishman, S. Pasternak, S.L. Wallenstein, R.W. Houde, J.C. Holland, and K.M. Foley The Memorial Pain Assessment Card. A valid instrument for the evaluation of cancer pain Cancer 60 1987 1151 1158
19. C. Cleeland Brief pain inventory Pain Res Gr 1991 http://www.mdanderson.org/education-and-research/departments-programs-and-labs/departments-and-divisions/symptom-research/symptom-assessment-tools/brief-pain-inventory.html [accessed 12.03.14]
20. EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D n.d. http://www.euroqol.org/about-eq-5d.html [accessed 12.03.14].
21. The SF Community. Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) n.d. http://www.sf-36.org/tools/SF36.shtml [accessed 12.03.14].
22. RAND Health. Medical Outcomes Study n.d. http://www.rand.org/health/surveys-tools/mos.html [accessed 12.03.14].
23. J. de Haes, M. Olschewski, P. Fayers, M. Visser, A. Cull, P. Hopwood, and et al. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients with the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist: A manual 2012 Northern Centre for Healthcare Research (NCH) Groningen
24. E. Eypasch, J.I. Williams, S. Wood-Dauphinee, B.M. Ure, C. Schmülling, E. Neugebauer, and et al. Gastrointestinal quality of life index: development, validation and application of a new instrument Br J Surg 82 1995 216 222
25. E. Bruera, N. Kuehn, M.J. Miller, P. Selmser, and K. Macmillan The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): A simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients J Palliat Care 7 1991 6 9
26. EORTC Quality of Life Department. EORTC IN-PATSAT32 n.d. http://groups.eortc.be/qol/eortc-patsat32 [accessed 12.03.14].
27. Nestlé Nutrition Institute. Mini Nutritional Assessment n.d. http://www.mna-elderly.com/ [accessed 12.03.14].
28. W.D. Rosmolen, K.R. Boer, R.J. de Leeuw, C.J. Gamel, M.I. van Berge Henegouwen, J.J. Bergman, and et al. Quality of life and fear of cancer recurrence after endoscopic and surgical treatment for early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus Endoscopy 42 2010 525 531 10.1055/s-0029-1244222
29. J. Bauer, S. Capra, and M. Ferguson Use of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer Eur J Clin Nutr 56 2002 779 785 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601412
30. H. Schuurmans, N. Steverink, N. Frieswijk, B.P. Buunk, J.P.J. Slaets, and S. Lindenberg How to measure self-management abilities in older people by self-report. The development of the SMAS-30 Qual Life Res 14 2005 2215 2228 10.1007/s11136-005-8166-9
31. D. Howell, M. Fitch, D. Bakker, E. Green, J. Sussman, S. Mayo, and et al. Core domains for a person-focused outcome measurement system in cancer (PROMS-Cancer Core) for routine care: A scoping review and Canadian Delphi Consensus Value Health 16 2013 76 87 10.1016/j.jval.2012.10.017
32. S. Pietersma, M. de Vries, and M.E. van den Akker-van Marle Domains of quality of life: results of a three-stage Delphi consensus procedure among patients, family of patients, clinicians, scientists and the general public Qual Life Res 23 2014 1543 1556 10.1007/s11136-013-0578-3
33. T. Heiberg, T. Nordby, T.K. Kvien, and T. Buanes Development and preliminary validation of the pancreatic cancer disease impact score Support Care Cancer 21 2013 1677 1684 10.1007/s00520-012-1713-3
34. F. Xie, S.-C. Li, and J. Thumboo Do health-related quality-of-life domains and items in knee and hip osteoarthritis vary in importance across social-cultural contexts? A qualitative systematic literature review Semin Arthritis Rheum 34 2005 793 804 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2005.02.003
35. A.M. Miller, K.T. Ashing, N.N. Modeste, R.P. Herring, and D.-A.T. Sealy Contextual factors influencing health-related quality of life in African American and Latina breast cancer survivors J Cancer Surviv 2015 10.1007/s11764-014-0420-0
36. H. Wainer, N. Dorans, and R. Flaugher Computerized adaptive testing: A primer 2000
37. A. Jemal, R. Siegel, J. Xu, and E. Ward Cancer statistics, 2010 CA Cancer J Clin 60 2011 277 300 10.3322/caac.20073
38. K.Y. Bilimoria, D.J. Bentrem, C.Y. Ko, A.K. Stewart, D.P. Winchester, and M.S. Talamonti National failure to operate on early stage pancreatic cancer Ann Surg 246 2007 173 180 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180691579