The Linguistic Annotation Framework: a standard for annotation interchange and merging

Language Resources and Evaluation

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 395-418

  Ide, Nancy ^a   Suderman, Keith ^a  

^a VASSAR COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Interoperability; Language resources; Linguistic annotation; Standards

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958056979     PISSN: 1574020X     EISSN: 15728412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10579-014-9268-1     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Baker, C. F., Fillmore, C. J., & Lowe, J. B. (1998). The Berkeley FrameNet project. In: COLING-ACL ’98: Proceedings of the conference (pp. 86–90).
2. Bird, S., & Liberman, M. (2001). A formal framework for linguistic annotation. Speech Communication, 33(1–2), 23–60.
3. Blumtritt, J., Bouda, P., & Rau, F. (2013). Poio API and GraF-XML: A radical stand-off approach in language documentation and language typology. In: Proceedings of balisage: The markup conference 2013, Montreal, Canada, Balisage Series on Markup Technologies (vol. 10). doi:10.4242/BalisageVol10.Bouda01.
4. Cunningham, H., Maynard, D., Bontcheva, K., & Tablan, V. (2002). GATE: A framework and graphical development environment for robust nlp tools and applications. In: Proceedings of ACL’02.
5. Ferrucci, D., & Lally, A. (2004). UIMA: An architectural approach to unstructured information processing in the corporate research environment. Natural Language Engineering, 10(3–4), 327–348.
6. Francopoulo, G. (Ed.). (2013). LMF: Lexical Markup Framework. London: Wiley-ISTE.
7. Ide, N., & Bunt, H. (2010). Anatomy of annotation schemes: Mapping to GrAF. In Proceedings of the fourth linguistic annotation workshop (LAW IV) (pp. 247–255). Uppsala: Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. Ide, N., & Romary, L. (2001). Standards for language resources. In: Proceedings of IRCS workshop on linguistic databases.
9. Ide, N., & Romary, L. (2003). Outline of the International Standard Linguistic Annotation Framework. In Proceedings of ACL’03 workshop on linguistic annotation: Getting the model right (pp. 1–5).
10. Ide, N., & Romary, L. (2004a). A registry of standard data categories for linguistic annotation. In Proceedings of the fourth international language resources and evaluation conference (LREC’04), Lisbon, Portugal (pp. 135–138).
11. Ide, N., & Romary, L. (2004b). International Standard for a Linguistic Annotation Framework. Journal of Natural Language Engineering, 10(3–4), 211–225.
12. Ide, N., & Romary, L. (2007). Towards international standards for language resources. In L. Dybkjaer, H. Hemsen, & W. Minker (Eds.), Evaluation of text and speech systems (pp. 263–284). Berlin: Springer.
13. Ide, N., & Suderman, K. (2007). GrAF: A graph-based format for linguistic annotations. In Proceedings of the linguistic annotation workshop (LAW), association for computational linguistics (pp. 1–8).
14. Ide, N., Bonhomme, P., & Romary, L. (2000). XCES: An XML-based encoding standard for linguistic corpora. In Proceedings of the second international language resources and evaluation conference (LREC’00).
15. Ide, N., Baker, C., Fellbaum, C., & Passonneau, R. (2010a). The manually annotated sub-corpus: A community resource for and by the people. In Proceedings of the ACL 2010 conference short papers (pp. 68–73). Uppsala: Association for Computational Linguistics.
16. Ide, N., Suderman, K., & Simms, B. (2010b). ANC2Go: A web application for customized corpus creation. In Proceedings of the seventh international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC), Valletta, Malta.
17. Ide, N., Prasad, R., & Joshi, A. (2011). Towards interoperability for the Penn discourse treebank. In Proceedings of the sixth joint ISO–ACL SIGSEM workshop on interoperable semantic annotation (pp. 49–55).
18. ISO. (2005). Language Resource Management–Feature Structures, Part 1: Feature structure representation. ISO Document ISO/DIS 24610–1.
19. ISO. (2012). Language Resource Management–Linguistic Annotation Framework. ISO 24612.
20. Kemps-Snijders, M., Windhouwer, M., Wittenburg, P., & Wright, S. E. (2009). ISOCat: Remodelling metadata for language resources. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 4, 261–276.
21. Kipp, M. (2001). ANVIL: A generic annotation tool for multimodal dialogue. In INTERSPEECH’01 (pp. 1367–1370).
22. Marcus, M. P., Santorini, B., & Marcinkiewicz, M. A. (1993). Building a large annotated corpus of english: The penn treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2), 313–330.
23. Neumann, A., Ide, N., & Stede, M. (2013). Importing MASC into the ANNIS linguistic database: A case study of mapping GrAF. In Proceedings of the seventh linguistic annotation workshop (LAW) (pp. 98–102). Bulgaria: Sofia.
24. Pustejovsky, J., Lee, K., Bunt, H., & Romary, L. (2010). ISO-TimeML: An international standard for semantic annotation. In Proceedings of the seventh international language resources and evaluation conference (LREC’10).
25. Thompson, HS., & McKelvie, D. (1997). Hyperlink semantics for standoff markup of read-only documents. In Proceedings of SGML Europe 97: The next decade-pushing the envelope (pp. 227–229).
26. Zeldes, A., Ritz, J., Lüdeling, A., & Chiarcos, C. (2009). ANNIS: A search tool for multi-layer annotated corpora. In Proceedings of corpus linguistics.