Detection of prostate cancer with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI): effect of dedicated reader education on accuracy and confidence of index and anterior cancer diagnosis

Abdominal Imaging

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 134-142

  Garcia Reyes, Kirema ^a   Passoni, Niccolò M ^a   Palmeri, Mark L ^b   Kauffman, Christopher R ^a   Choudhury, Kingshuk Roy ^a   Polascik, Thomas J ^a   Gupta, Rajan T ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Duke University   (United States)

Author keywords

Multiparametric prostate MRI; Prostate cancer; Reader education

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER GRADING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; GLEASON SCORE; HEALTH CARE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RADIOLOGIST; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

AGED; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84958049815     PISSN: 09428925     EISSN: 14320509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-014-0197-7     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. (2011) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2010. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, based on November 2012 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site. http://www.seercancergov/csr/1975_2010. Accessed 8 June 2013.
2. Gupta RT, Kauffman CR, Polascik TJ, Taneja SS, Rosenkrantz AB (2013) The state of prostate MRI in 2013. Oncology 27(4):262–270
3. Mufarrij P, Sankin A, Godoy G, Lepor H (2010) Pathologic outcomes of candidates for active surveillance undergoing radical prostatectomy. Urology 76(3):689–692
4. Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, et al. (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22(4):746–757
5. Ruprecht O, Weisser P, Bodelle B, Ackermann H, Vogl TJ (2012) MRI of the prostate: interobserver agreement compared with histopathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Radiol 81(3):456–460
6. Mullerad M, Hricak H, Wang L, et al. (2004) Prostate cancer: detection of extracapsular extension by genitourinary and general body radiologists at MR imaging. Radiology 232(1):140–146
7. Noguchi M, Stamey TA, McNeal J, Nolley R (2003) Prognostic factors for multifocal prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of significance of secondary cancers. J Urol 170(2):459–463
8. Wise AM, Stamey TA, McNeal JE, Clayton JL (2002) Morphologic and clinical significance of multifocal prostate cancers in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 60(2):264–269
9. Rosenkrantz AB, Deng F-M, Kim S, et al. (2012) Prostate cancer: multiparametric MRI for index lesion localization: a multiple-reader study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(4):830–837
10. Turkbey B, Mani H, Shah V, et al. (2011) Multiparametric 3 T prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect cancer: histopathological correlation using prostatectomy specimens processed in customized magnetic resonance imaging based molds. J Urol 186(5):1818–1824
11. Dickinson L, Ahmed HU, Allen C, et al. (2013) Scoring systems used for the interpretation and reporting of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection, localization, and characterization: could standardization lead to improved utilization of imaging within the diagnostic pathway? J Magn Reson Imag 37(1):48–58
12. Dickinson L, Ahmed HU, Allen C, et al. (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting. Eur Urol 59(4):477–494
13. Bott S, Young M, Kellett M, Parkinson M (2002) Anterior prostate cancer: is it more difficult to diagnose? BJU Int 89(9):886–889
14. Akin O, Riedl CC, Ishill NM, et al. (2010) Interactive dedicated training curriculum improves accuracy in the interpretation of MR imaging of prostate cancer. Eur Radiol 20(4):995–1002
15. Riches SF, Payne GS, Morgan VA, et al. (2009) MRI in the detection of prostate cancer: combined apparent diffusion coefficient, metabolite ratio, and vascular parameters. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(6):1583–1591
16. Vourganti S, Rastinehad A, Yerram NK, et al. (2012) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound fusion biopsy detect prostate cancer in patients with prior negative transrectal ultrasound biopsies. J Urol 188(6):2152–2157
17. Tsivian M, Gupta RT et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection and localization of prostate cancer: diagnostic properties (in press)
18. Eifler JB, Feng Z, Lin BM, et al. (2013) An updated prostate cancer staging nomogram (Partin tables) based on cases from 2006 to 2011. BJU Int 111(1):22–29
19. D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. (1998) Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 280(11):969–974
20. Kobus T, Vos PC, Hambrock T, et al. (2012) Prostate cancer aggressiveness: in vivo assessment of MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T. Radiology 265(2):457–467
21. Woodfield CA, Tung GA, Grand DJ, et al. (2010) Diffusion-weighted MRI of peripheral zone prostate cancer: comparison of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient with Gleason score and percentage of tumor on core biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(4):W316–W322
22. Hambrock T, Somford DM, Huisman HJ, et al. (2011) Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer. Radiology 259(2):453–461