Clinical, mechanical, and immunohistopathological effects of tissue adhesives on the colon: An in-vivo study

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 105, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 846-854

  Vakalopoulos, Konstantinos A ^a   Wu, Zhouqiao ^a   Kroese, Leonard F ^a   van der Horst, Paul H ^a   Lam, King H ^a   Dodou, Dimitra ^b   Jeekel, Johannes J ^a   Lange, Johan F ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

colorectal; complications; gastrointestinal; surgery; tissue adhesive; tissue glue

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVES; GLUING; RATS; SURGERY;

CLINICAL COMPLICATIONS; COLORECTAL; COMPLICATIONS; GASTROINTESTINAL; HIGH MECHANICAL STRENGTH; IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS; RESORCINOL FORMALDEHYDES; TISSUE ADHESIVES;

TISSUE;

CD20 ANTIGEN; CD4 ANTIGEN; CD68 ANTIGEN; CD8 ANTIGEN; ENBUCRILATE; FIBRIN GLUE; GELATIN RESORCINOL FORMALDEHYDE; KI 67 ANTIGEN; SURGICAL GLUE; TISSUE ADHESIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CELL COUNT; CLINICAL OUTCOME; COLON TISSUE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CYTOTOXICITY; ILEUS; IMMUNE RESPONSE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IMMUNOPATHOLOGY; IN VIVO STUDY; INFLAMMATION; INTESTINE INJURY; MALE; NONHUMAN; PERITONITIS; RAT; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TARGET TISSUE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TISSUE ADHESION; TISSUE REACTION; ANASTOMOSIS; ANIMAL; COLON; METABOLISM; PATHOLOGY; SURGERY; TIME FACTOR; WISTAR RAT;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANIMALS; COLON; MALE; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE ADHESIVES;

EID: 84957990336     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33621     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Kingham TP, Pachter HL. Colonic anastomotic leak: Risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 2009;208(2):269–278.
2. Wesselmann S, Winter A. Documented quality of care in certified colorectal cancer centers in Germany: German Cancer Society benchmarking report for 2013. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014;29(4):511–518.
3. Komen N, Slieker J. High tie versus low tie in rectal surgery: Comparison of anastomotic perfusion. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011;26(8):1075–1078.
4. Bruce J, Krukowski ZH. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 2001;88(9):1157–1168.
5. Vakalopoulos KA, Daams F. Tissue adhesives in gastrointestinal anastomosis: A systematic review. J Surg Res 2013;180(2):290–300.
6. Reece TB, Maxey TS. A prospectus on tissue adhesives. Am J Surg 2001;182(2 Suppl):40S–44S.
7. Bluestein D, Slepian MJ. Sticking with synthetic tissue sealants. N Engl J Med 2014;370(16):1556–1559.
8. Vakalopoulos KA, Wu Z. Mechanical strength and rheological properties of tissue adhesives with regard to colorectal anastomosis: An ex vivo study. Ann Surg 2014;261(2):323–331.
9. Al-Mubarak L, Al-Haddab M. Cutaneous wound closure materials: An overview and update. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2013;6(4):178–188.
10. Senol M, Altintas MM. The effect of fibrin glue on the intensity of colonic anastomosis in the presence and absence of peritonitis: An experimental randomized controlled trial on rats. ISRN Surg 2013;2013:521413.
11. Spotnitz WD, Burks S. Hemostats, sealants, and adhesives II: Update as well as how and when to use the components of the surgical toolbox. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2010;16(5):497–514.
12. Kanellos I, Mantzoros I. Effects of the use of fibrin glue around the colonic anastomosis of the rat. Tech Coloproctol 2003; 7(2):82–84.
13. Van der Vijver RJ, van Laarhoven CJ. The effect of fibrin glue on the early healing phase of intestinal anastomoses in the rat. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012;27(8):1101–1107.
14. Kim KD, Wright NM. Polyethylene glycol hydrogel spinal sealant (DuraSeal Spinal Sealant) as an adjunct to sutured dural repair in the spine: Results of a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(23):1906–1912.
15. Neuman BJ, Radcliff K. Cauda equina syndrome after a TLIF resulting from postoperative expansion of a hydrogel dural sealant. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470(6):1640–1645.
16. Shiono M. Surgery for acute aortic dissection using gelatin-resorcin-formalin glue: Perspective from 10 years of follow-up at a single center. J Artif Organs 2008;11(1):19–23.
17. Fehrenbacher JW, Siderys H. Use of BioGlue in aortic surgery: Proper application techniques and results in 92 patients. Heart Surg Forum 2006;9(5):E794–E799.
18. Vokrri L, Qavdarbasha A. Experimental study of sutureless vascular anastomosis with use of glued prosthesis in rabbits. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2015;11:211–217.
19. Witter K, Tonar Z. Tissue reaction to three different types of tissue glues in an experimental aorta dissection model: A quantitative approach. Histochem Cell Biol 2010;133(2):241–259.
20. Fullum TM, Aluka KJ. Decreasing anastomotic and staple line leaks after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 2009;23(6):1403–1408.
21. Upadhyaya VD, Gopal SC. Role of fibrin glue as a sealant to esophageal anastomosis in cases of congenital esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula. World J Surg 2007;31(12):2412–2415.
22. Saldana-Cortes JA, Larios-Arceo F. Role of fibrin glue in the prevention of cervical leakage and strictures after esophageal reconstruction of caustic injury. World J Surg 2009;33(5):986–993.
23. Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL. Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg 2004;8(7):766–772.
24. Oida T, Mimastu K. Toward zero pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy for soft pancreas in low-volume pancreatic surgery centers. Hepatogastroenterology 2009;56(91-92):886–890.
25. Yurtcu M, Arbag H. The healing effects of tissue glues and healing agent locally applied on esophageal anastomoses. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010;74(1):43–46.
26. Argyra E, Polymeneas G. Sutureless pancreatojejunal anastomosis using an absorbable sealant: Evaluation in a pig model. J Surg Res 2009;153(2):282–286.
27. Pommergaard HC, Achiam MP. External coating of colonic anastomoses: A systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012;27(10):1247–1258.
28. Cueto J, Barrientos T. Further experimental studies on a biodegradable adhesive for protection of colorectal anastomosis. Arch Med Res 2014;45(4):331–336.
29. Komen N, van der Wal HC. Colorectal anastomotic leakage: A new experimental model. J Surg Res 2009;155(1):7–12.
30. Zuhlke HV, Lorenz EM. [Pathophysiology and classification of adhesions] Pathophysiologie und Klassifikation von Adhasionen. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II Verh Dtsch Ges Chir 1990:1009–1016.
31. Kanellos D, Blouhos K. Effect of 5-fluorouracil plus interferon on the integrity of colonic anastomoses covering with fibrin glue. World J Surg 2007;31(1):186–191.
32. Slieker JC, Vakalopoulos KA. Prevention of leakage by sealing colon anastomosis: Experimental study in a mouse model. J Surg Res 2013;184(2):819–824.
33. Sweeney T, Rayan S. Intestinal anastomoses detected with a photopolymerized hydrogel. Surgery 2002;131(2):185–189.
34. Wu Z, Boersema GS. Critical analysis of cyanoacrylate in intestinal and colorectal anastomosis. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2014;102(3):635–642.
35. Kanellos I, Mantzoros I. Sutureless colonic anastomosis in the rat: A randomized controlled study. Tech Coloproctol 2002;6(3):143–146.
36. Elemen L, Sarimurat N. Is the use of cyanoacrylate in intestinal anastomosis a good and reliable alternative? J Pediatr Surg 2009;44(3):581–586.
37. Yol S, Tekin A. Effects of platelet rich plasma on colonic anastomosis. J Surg Res 2008;146(2):190–194.
38. Giuratrabocchetta S, Rinaldi M. Protection of intestinal anastomosis with biological glues: An experimental randomized controlled trial. Tech Coloproctol 2011;15(2):153–158.