Comparison of biogas sludge and raw crop material as source of hydrolytic cultures for anaerobic digestion

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 207, Issue , 2016, Pages 244-251

  Weiß, Stefan ^a   Somitsch, Walter ^b,c   Klymiuk, Ingeborg ^d   Trajanoski, Slave ^d   Guebitz, Georg M ^a,e  

^a AUSTRIAN CENTRE OF INDUSTRIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^b Engineering Consultant   (Austria)

^c IPUS Mineral und Umwelttechnologie GmbH   (Austria)

^d MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

Author keywords

Bioaugmentation; Biogas; Green cut; Wheat straw; Zeolite

Indexed keywords

BIOGAS; BIOPOLYMERS; CROPS; METHANE; RNA; SLUDGE DIGESTION; STRAW; SUBSTRATES; ZEOLITES;

454-PYROSEQUENCING; BIO-AUGMENTATION; BIOLOGICAL METHANE POTENTIAL; GREEN CUT; MESOPHILIC CONDITION; MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES; SUBSTRATE MATERIAL; WHEAT STRAWS;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

BIOGAS; BIOPOLYMER; BIOFUEL; CELLULASE; HYDROLASE; METHANE; RNA 16S; SEWAGE;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BACTERIUM; BIOGAS; BIOREACTOR; CROP PLANT; DIGESTIBILITY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GROWTH RESPONSE; HYDROLYSIS; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MICROBIAL ECOLOGY; SLUDGE; STRAW; ZEOLITE;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BIOFILM; BIOMASS; CROP; ENRICHMENT CULTURE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; HYDROLYSIS; INOCULATION; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MIXED CELL CULTURE; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOBACTERIA; RAW CROP MATERIAL; SLUDGE; SPIROCHETE; SUBSTRATE CONCENTRATION; ANAEROBIC GROWTH; BACTERIUM; BIOREMEDIATION; BIOSYNTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SEWAGE; WASTE DISPOSAL;

ACER; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); FIRMICUTES; PROTEOBACTERIA; SPIROCHAETES; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

ANAEROBIOSIS; BACTERIA; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOFUELS; CELLULASE; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; HYDROLASES; HYDROLYSIS; METHANE; REFUSE DISPOSAL; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; SEWAGE;

EID: 84957990035     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.137     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ács N., Bagi Z., Rákhely G., Minárovics J., Nagy K., Kovács K.L. Bioaugmentation of biogas production by a hydrogen-producing bacterium. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 186:286-293.
2. Adu-Gyamfi N., Ravella S.R., Hobbs P.J. Optimizing anaerobic digestion by selection of the immobilizing surface for enhanced methane production. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 120:248-255.
3. Angelidaki I., Ahring B.K. Methods for increasing the biogas potential from the recalcitrant organic matter contained in manure. Water Sci. Technol. 2000, 41:189-194.
4. Baena S., Fardeau M.L., Labat M., Ollivier B., Garcia J.L., Patel B.K.C. Desulfovibrio aminophilus sp. nov., a novel amino acid degrading and sulfate reducing bacterium from an anaerobic dairy wastewater lagoon. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1998, 504:498-504.
5. Bragg L., Stone G., Imelfort M., Hugenholtz P., Tyson G.W. Fast, accurate error-correction of amplicon pyrosequences using Acacia. Nat. Methods 2012, 9:425-426.
6. Caporaso J.G., Kuczynski J., Stombaugh J., Bittinger K., Bushman F.D., Costello E.K., Fierer N., Peña A.G., Goodrich J.K., Gordon J.I., Huttley G.A., Kelley S.T., Knights D., Koenig J.E., Ley R.E., Lozupone C.A., McDonald D., Muegge B.D., Pirrung M., Reeder J., Sevinsky J.R., Turnbaugh P.J., Walters W.A., Widmann J., Yatsunenko T., Zaneveld J., Knight R. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:335-336.
7. Chao A., Chazdon R.L., Colwell R.K., Shen T.-J. A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 8:148-159.
8. Deer A., Howie R., Wise W.S., Zussman J. Framework silicates: silica minerals, feldspathoids and the zeolites. Rock Forming Minerals 2004, The Geological Society, London.
9. Deflaun M.F., Steffan R.J. Bioaugmentation. Encyclopedia of Environmental Microbiology 2002, 434-442. Wiley-Interscience, New York. G. Bitton (Ed.).
10. Díaz C., Baena S., Patel B.K.C., Fardeau M.L. Peptidolytic microbial community of methanogenic reactors from two modified uasbs of brewery industries. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2010, 41:707-717.
11. Fang C., Boe K., Angelidaki I. Anaerobic co-digestion of desugared molasses with cow manure: focusing on sodium and potassium inhibition. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:1005-1011.
12. Godon J.-J., Morinière J., Moletta M., Gaillac M., Bru V., Delgènes J.-P. Rarity associated with specific ecological niches in the bacterial world: the "Synergistes" example. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 7:213-224.
13. Gustavsson J., Svensson B.H., Karlsson A. The feasibility of trace element supplementation for stable operation of wheat stillage-fed biogas tank reactors. Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 64:320-325.
14. Haas B.J., Gevers D., Earl A.M., Feldgarden M., Ward D.V., Giannoukos G., Ciulla D., Tabbaa D., Highlander S.K., Sodergren E., Methé B., DeSantis T.Z., Petrosino J.F., Knight R., Birren B.W. Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome Res. 2011, 21:494-504.
15. Hamady M., Lozupone C., Knight R. Fast UniFrac: facilitating high-throughput phylogenetic analyses of microbial communities including analysis of pyrosequencing and PhyloChip data. ISME J. 2010, 4:17-27.
16. Hattori S. Syntrophic acetate-oxidizing microbes in methanogenic environments. Microb. Environ. 2008, 23:118-127.
17. Holper, J., Lesjak, M., Heinzel, U., Boos, B., 2005. Zeolith in der Biogasgewinnung. EP 1 1577 269 A1.
18. Lebuhn, M., Munk, B., Effenberger, M., 2014. Agricultural biogas production in Germany - from practice to microbiology basics 1-21.
19. Lebuhn M., Weiß S., Munk B., Guebitz G.M. Microbiology and molecular biology tools for biogas process analysis, diagnosis and control. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2015, 151:1-40.
20. Lee S., Park J., Kang H., Haeng Y., Jun T., Park H. Distribution and abundance of Spirochaetes in full-scale anaerobic digesters. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 145:25-32.
21. Lin L., Wan C., Liu X., Lei Z., Lee D.-J., Zhang Y., Tay J.H., Zhang Z. Anaerobic digestion of swine manure under natural zeolite addition: VFA evolution, cation variation, and related microbial diversity. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97:10575-10583.
22. McInerney M.J., Bryant M.P., Hespell R.B., Costerton J.W. Syntrophomonas wolfei gen. nov. sp. nov., an anaerobic, syntrophic, fatty acid-oxidizing bacterium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1981, 41:1029-1039.
23. Ming D.W., Allen E.R. Use of natural zeolites in agronomy, horticulture, and environmental soil remediation. Natural Zeolites: Occurence, Properties, Applications 2001, 619-654. Mineralogical Society of America, Geochemical Society. P.H. Ribbe, J.J. Rosso (Eds.).
24. Pobeheim H., Munk B., Müller H., Berg G., Guebitz G.M. Characterization of an anaerobic population digesting a model substrate for maize in the presence of trace metals. Chemosphere 2010, 80:829-836.
25. Price M.N., Dehal P.S., Arkin A.P. FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2009, 26:1641-1650.
26. Rees G.N., Patel B.K.C., Grassia G.S., Sheehy A.J. Anaerobaculum thermoterrenum gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel, thermophilic bacterium which ferments citrate. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1997, 47:150-154.
27. Schauer-Gimenez A.E., Zitomer D.H., Maki J.S., Struble C.A. Bioaugmentation for improved recovery of anaerobic digesters after toxicant exposure. Water Res. 2010, 44:3555-3564.
28. Sundberg C., Al-Soud W.A., Larsson M., Alm E., Yekta S.S., Svensson B.H., Sørensen S.J., Karlsson A. 454-pyrosequencing analyses of bacterial and archaeal richness in 21 full-scale biogas digesters. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2013, 85:612-626.
29. Tale V.P., Maki J.S., Struble C.A., Zitomer D.H. Methanogen community structure-activity relationship and bioaugmentation of overloaded anaerobic digesters. Water Res. 2011, 16:5249-5256.
30. Wang Q., Garrity G.M., Tiedje J.M., Cole J.R. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73:5261-5267.
31. Weiss S., Tauber M., Somitsch W., Meincke R., Müller H., Berg G., Guebitz G.M. Enhancement of biogas production by addition of hemicellulolytic bacteria immobilised on activated zeolite. Water Res. 2010, 44:1970-1980.
32. Weiss S., Zankel A., Lebuhn M., Petrak S., Somitsch W., Guebitz G.M. Investigation of mircroorganisms colonising activated zeolites during anaerobic biogas production from grass silage. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:4353-4359.
33. Weiss S., Lebuhn M., Andrade D., Zankel A., Cardinale M., Birner-Gruenberger R., Somitsch W., Ueberbacher B.J., Guebitz G.M. Activated zeolite - suitable carriers for microorganisms in anaerobic digestion processes?. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97:3225-3238.
34. Westerholm M., Levén L., Schnürer A. Bioaugmentation of syntrophic acetate-oxidizing culture in biogas reactors exposed to increasing levels of ammonia. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78:7619-7625.
35. Yu S., Zhang G., Li J., Zhao Z., Kang X. Effect of endogenous hydrolytic enzymes pretreatment on the anaerobic digestion of sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 146:758-761.