Network analysis of functional brain connectivity driven by gamma-band auditory steady-state response in auditory hallucinations

Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 45-51

  Ying, Jun ^a,b   Zhou, Dan ^a   Lin, Ke ^b   Gao, Xiaorong ^b  

^a CHINESE PLA GENERAL HOSPITAL   (China)

^b Tsinghua University   (China)

Author keywords

Auditory hallucinations; Auditory steadystate response (ASSR); Directed transfer function (DTF); Functional connectivity; Graph theory

Indexed keywords

DIRECTED GRAPHS; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; GRAPH THEORY; POWER SPECTRAL DENSITY; SPECTRAL DENSITY; SPEECH RECOGNITION; TRANSFER FUNCTIONS;

AUDITORY HALLUCINATIONS; DIRECTED TRANSFER FUNCTIONS; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; POWER SPECTRAL DENSITY ANALYSIS; SCHIZOPHRENIA PATIENTS; SPEECH UNDERSTANDING; STEADY-STATE RESPONSE; SYNCHRONOUS OSCILLATION;

BRAIN;

EID: 84957990022     PISSN: 16090985     EISSN: 21994757     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40846-015-0004-0     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Brenner, C. A., Krishnan, G. P., Vohs, J. L., Ahn, W. Y., Hetrick, W. P., Morzorati, S. L., & O'Donnell, B. F. (2009). Steady state responses: Electrophysiological assessment of sensory function in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 35, 1065-1077.
2. Picton, T. W. (2003). Human auditory steady-state responses. International Journal of Audiology, 42, 177-219.
3. Singer, W. (1999). Neuronal synchrony: A versatile code for the definition of relations. Neuron, 24, 25-49.
4. Mulert, C., Leicht, G., Hepp, P., Kirsch, V., Karch, S., Pogarell, O., et al. (2010). Single-trial c oupling of the gamma-band response and the corresponding BOLD signal. Neuroimage, 39, 2238-2247.
5. Spencer, K. M., Niznikiewicz, M. A., & Nestor, P. G. (2009). Left auditory cortex gamma synchronization and auditory hallucination symptoms in schizophrenia. BMC Neuroscience, 10, 85.
6. Yan, Z., & Gao, X. R. (2011). Functional connectivity analysis of steady-state visual evoked potentials. Neuroscience Letters, 499, 199-203.
7. Brovelli, A., Ding, M., Ledberg, A., Chen, Y., Nakamura, R., & Bressler, S. (2004). Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: Directional influences revealed by Granger causality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 9849-9854.
8. Lee, L., Harrison, L., & Mechelli, A. (2003). The functional brain connectivity workshop: Report and commentary. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 14, 1-15.
9. Baccala, L. A., & Sameshima, K. (2001). Partial directed coherence: A new concept in neural structure determination. Biological Cybernetics, 84, 463-474.
10. Buchel, C., & Friston, K. (1997). Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modeling and fMRI. Cerebral Cortex, 7, 768-778.
11. Kaminski, M., Ding, M., Truccolo, W., & Bressler, S. (2001). Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statical assessment of significance. Biological Cybernetics, 85, 145-157.
12. Granger, C. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 37(3), 424-438.
13. Astolfi, L., Cincotti, F., Mattia, D., Babiloni, C., Carducci, F., Basilisco, A., et al. (2005). Assessing brain functional connectivity by linear inverse estimation and directed transfer function: simulations and application to real data. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116, 920-932.
14. Babiloni, F. (2010). From the analysis of the brain images to the study of brain networks using functional connectivity and multimodal brain signals. Brain Topography, 23, 115-118.
15. Don, M., Kwong, B., & Tanaka, C. (2005). A diagnostic test for Meniere's disease and cochlear hydrops: Impaired high-pass noise masking of auditory brainstem response. Otology & Neu- rotology, 26, 711-722.
16. Franaszczuk, P., Blinowska, K., & Kowalczyk, M. (1985). The application of parametric multichannel spectral estimates in the study of electrical brain activity. Biological Cybernetics, 51, 239-247.
17. Kaminski, M., & Blinowska, K. (1991). A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures. Biological Cybernetics, 65, 203-210.
18. He, B., Dai, Y., Astolfi, L., Babiloni, F., Yuan, H., & Yang, L. (2011). eConnectome: A MATLAB toolbox for mapping and imaging of brain functional connectivity. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 195, 261-269.
19. Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9-21.
20. Herdman, A. T., Lins, O., & Van, P. (2002). Roon: Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Brain Topography, 15, 6-86.
21. Gutschalk, A., Mase, R., Roth, R., Ille, N., Rupp, A., Hahnel, S., et al. (1999). Deconvolution of 40 Hz steady-state fields reveals two overlapping source activities of the human auditory cortex. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 85-868.
22. Ying, J., Yan, Z., & Gao, X. (2013). 40 Hz Auditory steady state response to linguistic features of stimuli during auditory hallucinations. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 33, 748-753.
23. Sporns, O., & Zwi, J. D. (2004). The small world of the cerebral cortex. Neuroinformatics, 2, 145-162.
24. Friston, K. (2002). Beyond phrenology: What can neuroimaging tell us about distributed circuitry. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 221-250.