User-based visual-interactive similarity definition for mixed data objects-concept and first implementation

22nd International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Computer Vision, WSCG 2014, Communication Papers Proceedings - in co-operation with EUROGRAPHICS Association

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 329-338

  Bernard, Jürgen ^a,b   Davey, James ^a   Sessler, David ^a,b   Kuijper, Arjan ^a,b   Ruppert, Tobias ^a   Kohlhammer, Jörn ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER IGD   (Germany)

^b DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Feature Selection; Information Visualization; Mixed Data Sets; Similarity Measures; User Feedback; User centered Design; Visual Analytics

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER VISION; FEATURE EXTRACTION; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; USER CENTERED DESIGN; VISUALIZATION;

INFORMATION VISUALIZATION; MIXED DATA; SIMILARITY MEASURE; USER FEEDBACK; VISUAL ANALYTICS;

DATA VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84957878454     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (51)

1. Gediminas Adomavicius and Alexander Tuzhilin. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. TKDE, pages 734-749, 2005.
2. Bilal Alsallakh, Wolfgang Aigner, Silvia Miksch, and M. Eduard Groller. Reinventing the contingency wheel: scalable visual analytics of large categorical data. TVCG, pages 2849-2858, 2012.
3. Mihael Ankerst, Martin Ester, and Hans-Peter Kriegel. Towards an effective cooperation of the user and the computer for classification. In SIGKDD, pages 179-188. ACM, 2000.
4. K. Bache and M. Lichman. Flags Data Set-UCI machine learning repository, 2013.
5. Sugato Basu, Mikhail Bilenko, Arindam Banerjee, and Raymond J Mooney. Probabilistic semi-supervised clustering with constraints. Semi-supervised Learning, pages 71-98, 2006.
6. Jürgen Bernard, Tatiana von Landesberger, Sebastian Bremm, and Tobias Schreck. Multi-scale visual quality assessment for cluster analysis with self-organizing maps. In VDA, Proceedings of SPIE; 7868, pages 78680N-1-78680N-12. SPIE, 2011.
7. Jürgen Bernard, Tobias Ruppert, Oliver Goroll, Thorsten May, and Jörn Kohlhammer. Visual-interactive preprocessing of time series data. In SIGRAD, pages 39-48, 2012.
8. Jürgen Bernard, Tobias Ruppert, Maximilian Scherer, Jörn Kohlhammer, and Tobias Schreck. Content-based layouts for exploratory metadata search in scientific research data. JCDL, pages 139-148, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.
9. Jürgen Bernard, Martin Steiger, Sven Widmer, Hendrik Lücke-Tieke, Thorsten May, and Jörn Kohlhammer. Visual-interactive exploration of interesting multivariate relations in mixed research data sets. In Computer Graphics Forum, Proceedings EuroVis, 2014, Swansea, Wales, UK, volume 33, 2014.
10. Jürgen Bernard, Nils Wilhelm, Björn Krüger, Thorsten May, Tobias Schreck, and Jörn Kohlhammer. Motionexplorer: Exploratory search in human motion capture data based on hierarchical aggregation. TVCG, 19(12):2257-2266, 2013.
11. Rita Borgo, Johannes Kehrer, David H.S. Chung, Eamonn Maguire, Robert S. Laramee, Helwig Hauser, Matthew Ward, and Min Chen. Glyph-based visualization: Foundations, design guidelines, techniques and applications. In EG State of the Art Reports, pages 39-63. Eurographics Association, 2013.
12. Shyam Boriah, Varun Chandola, and Vipin Kumar. Similarity measures for categorical data: A comparative evaluation. SIAM, 30(2):3, 2008.
13. Eli T Brown, Jingjing Liu, Carla E Brodley, and Remco Chang. Dis-function: Learning distance functions interactively. In VAST, pages 83-92. IEEE, 2012.
14. Sung-Hyuk Cha, Sungsoon Yoon, and Charles C Tappert. Enhancing binary feature vector similarity measures. 2005.
15. Seung-Seok Choi, Sung-Hyuk Cha, and Charles C Tappert. A survey of binary similarity and distance measures. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics & Informatics, 8(1), 2010.
16. Jaegul Choo, Hanseung Lee, Jaeyeon Kihm, and Haesun Park. ivisclassifier: An interactive visual analytics system for classification based on supervised dimension reduction. In VAST, pages 27-34. IEEE, 2010.
17. Niklas Elmqvist and Jean-Daniel Fekete. Hierarchical aggregation for information visualization: Overview, techniques, and design guidelines. TVCG, 16(3):439-454, 2010.
18. Mohammad Ghoniem, Jean-Daniel Fekete, and Philippe Castagliola. A comparison of the readability of graphs using node-link and matrix-based representations. In Information Visualization, pages 17-24. IEEE, 2004.
19. Isabelle Guyon and André Elisseeff. An introduction to variable and feature selection. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:1157-1182, 2003.
20. Mark Hall, Eibe Frank, Geoffrey Holmes, Bernhard Pfahringer, Peter Reutemann, and Ian H Witten. The weka data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD, pages 10-18, 2009.
21. Douglas M Hawkins. The problem of overfitting. Chemical information and computer sciences, pages 1-12, 2004.
22. Masaki Hilaga, Yoshihisa Shinagawa, Taku Kohmura, and Tosiyasu L Kunii. Topology matching for fully automatic similarity estimation of 3d shapes. In SIGGRAPH, pages 203-212. ACM, 2001.
23. Stephen Ingram, Tamara Munzner, Veronika Irvine, Melanie Tory, Steven Bergner, and T Moller. Dimstiller: Workflows for dimensional analysis and reduction. In VAST, pages 3-10. IEEE, 2010.
24. Edwin T Jaynes. Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physical review, 106(4):620, 1957.
25. Dong Hyun Jeong, Caroline Ziemkiewicz, Brian Fisher, William Ribarsky, and Remco Chang. ipca: An interactive system for pca-based visual analytics. In Computer Graphics Forum, volume 28, pages 767-774, 2009.
26. Ll Jie, Gao Xinbo, and Jiao Li-Cheng. A csa-based clustering algorithm for large data sets with mixed numeric and categorical values. In WCICA, pages 2303-2307. IEEE, 2004.
27. Sara Johansson. Visual exploration of categorical and mixed data sets. In SIGKDD, pages 21-29. ACM, 2009.
28. Sara Johansson, Mikael Jern, and Jimmy Johansson. Interactive quantification of categorical variables in mixed data sets. In Information Visualization, pages 3-10. IEEE, 2008.
29. Robert Kosara, Fabian Bendix, and Helwig Hauser. Parallel sets: Interactive exploration and visual analysis of categorical data. TVCG, 12(4):558-568, 2006.
30. Joseph Lee Rodgers andWAlan Nicewander. Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. The American Statistician, 42(1):59-66, 1988.
31. Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Maria Rifqi, and H Benhadda. Similarity measures for binary and numerical data: a survey. IJKESDP Journal, pages 63-84, 2009.
32. Alexander Lex, H Schulz, Marc Streit, Christian Partl, and Dieter Schmalstieg. Visbricks: multiform visualization of large, inhomogeneous data. TVCG, pages 2291-2300, 2011.
33. Zhicheng Liu and John T Stasko. Mental models, visual reasoning and interaction in information visualization: A top-down perspective. TVCG, 16(6):999-1008, 2010.
34. Gladys MH Mamani, Francisco M Fatore, Luis G Nonato, and Fernando V Paulovich. User-driven feature space transformation. In CGF, pages 291-299, 2013.
35. T May, J Davey, and T Ruppert. Smartstripes-looking under the hood of feature subset selection methods. In EuroVA, pages 13-16, 2011.
36. Thomas Mühlbacher and Harald Piringer. A partition-based framework for building and validating regression models. TVCG, 19(12):1962-1971, December 2013.
37. Tamara Munzner. A nested model for visualization design and validation. TVCG, 15(6):921-928, November 2009.
38. pixolution-Visual Search. http://www.pixolution.de/index.php?id=5.
39. A Johannes Pretorius and Jarke J Van Wijk. What does the user want to see? what do the data want to be? Information Visualization, 8(3):153-166, 2009.
40. Philip H Ramsey. Critical values for spearman's rank order correlation. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 14(3):245-253, 1989.
41. Gerard Salton and Chris Buckley. Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. Readings in Information Retrieval, 24:5, 1997.
42. Tobias Schreck, Jürgen Bernard, Tatiana Tekušová, and Jörn Kohlhammer. Visual cluster analysis of trajectory data with interactive Kohonen maps. Palgrave Macmillan Information Visualization, 8:14-29, 2009.
43. Burr Settles. Active learning literature survey. University of Wisconsin, Madison, 52:55-66, 2010.
44. Ben Shneiderman. The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In VL, pages 336-, Washington, DC, USA, 1996. IEEE Computer Society.
45. Robert R Sokal and Peter HA Sneath. Numerical taxonomy. Freemont, San Francisco, CA, 1973.
46. Justin Talbot, Bongshin Lee, Ashish Kapoor, and Desney S Tan. Ensemblematrix: interactive visualization to support machine learning with multiple classifiers. In SIGCHI, pages 1283-1292. ACM, 2009.
47. Jarke J van Wijk. Bridging the gaps. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 26(6):6-9, 2006.
48. Jarkko Venna and Samuel Kaski. Neighborhood preservation in nonlinear projection methods: An experimental study. In ICANN, pages 485-491. Springer-Verlag, 2001.
49. Malcolm Ware, Eibe Frank, Geoffrey Holmes, Mark Hall, and Ian H Witten. Interactive machine learning: letting users build classifiers. Human-Computer Studies, pages 281-292, 2001.
50. Kilian Weinberger, John Blitzer, and Lawrence Saul. Distance metric learning for large margin nearest neighbor classification. NIPS, page 1473, 2006.
51. Liu Yang and Rong Jin. Distance metric learning: A comprehensive survey. Michigan State University, 2, 2006.