Interoperability between phenotypes in research and healthcare terminologies-Investigating partial mappings between HPO and SNOMED CT

Journal of Biomedical Semantics

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Dhombres, Ferdinand ^a   Bodenreider, Olivier ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Human phenotype; Interoperability; Ontology; Partial mapping; Standard terminologies

Indexed keywords

GENE ONTOLOGY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; NOMENCLATURE; PHENOTYPE; SYSTEMATIZED NOMENCLATURE OF MEDICINE;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; GENE ONTOLOGY; HUMANS; PHENOTYPE; SYSTEMATIZED NOMENCLATURE OF MEDICINE; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 84957863777     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13326-016-0047-3     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Robinson PN. Deep phenotyping for precision medicine. Hum Mutat. 2012;33:777-80.
2. Frey LJ, Lenert L, Lopez-Campos G. EHR big data deep phenotyping. Contribution of the IMIA genomic medicine working group. Yearb Med Inform. 2014;9:206-11.
3. Winnenburg R, Bodenreider O: Coverage of Phenotypes in Standard Terminologies. In Joint Bio-Ontologies and BioLINK ISMB'2014 SIG session "Phenotype Day Boston, USA. 2014: 41-44.
4. Dhombres F, Winnenburg R, Case JT, Bodenreider O: Extending the coverage of phenotypes in SNOMED CT through post-coordination. MEDINFO Proceedings 2015, in press:5p.
5. Beck T, Free RC, Thorisson GA, Brookes AJ. Semantically enabling a genome-wide association study database. J Biomed Semantics. 2012;3:9.
6. Kohler S, Doelken SC, Mungall CJ, Bauer S, Firth HV, Bailleul-Forestier I, et al. The Human Phenotype Ontology project: linking molecular biology and disease through phenotype data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D966-974.
7. SNOMED CT [ http://www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct ]
8. Bodenreider O. The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:D267-270.
9. Euzenat J, Shvaiko P. Ontology matching. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2013.
10. Do H-H, Rahm E. COMA: a system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches. In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Very Large Data Bases. Hong Kong: VLDB Endowment; 2002. p. 610-21.
11. Madhavan J, Bernstein PA, Rahm E: Generic Schema Matching with Cupid. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.; 2001:49-58.
12. Suchanek FM, Abiteboul S, Senellart P. PARIS: probabilistic alignment of relations, instances, and schema. Proc VLDB Endowment. 2011;5:157-68.
13. Spiliopoulos V, Vouros GA, Karkaletsis V. On the discovery of subsumption relations for the alignment of ontologies. Web Semant Sci Serv Agents World Wide Web. 2010;8:69-88.
14. Slabbekoorn K, Hollink L, Houben G-J. Domain-Aware ontology matching. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on The Semantic Web - Volume Part I. Boston: Springer; 2012. p. 542-58.
15. Jain P, Hitzler P, Sheth AP, Verma K, Yeh PZ. Ontology alignment for linked open data. In: Proceedings of the 9th international semantic web conference on The semantic web - Volume Part I. Shanghai: Springer; 2010. p. 402-17.
16. Ogren PV, Cohen KB, Acquaah-Mensah GK, Eberlein J, Hunter L: The compositional structure of Gene Ontology terms. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2004;9:214-225.
17. Mungall CJ. Obol: integrating language and meaning in bio-ontologies. Comp Funct Genomics. 2004;5:509-20.
18. Ogren PV, Cohen KB, Hunter L: Implications of compositionality in the gene ontology for its curation and usage. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2005:10;174-185.
19. Verspoor CM, Joslyn C, Papcun GJ: The gene ontology as a source of lexical semantic knowledge for a biological natural language processing application. SIGIR workshop on Text Analysis and Search for Bioinformatics 2003:51-56.
20. Bodenreider O, Burgun A, Rindflesch TC. Assessing the consistency of a biomedical terminology through lexical knowledge. Int J Med Inform. 2002;67:85-95.
21. Groza T, Hunter J, Zankl A. Decomposing phenotype descriptions for the human skeletal phenome. Biomed Inform Insights. 2013;6:1-14.
22. Oellrich A, Grabmuller C, Rebholz-Schuhmann D. Automatically transforming pre- to post-composed phenotypes: EQ-lising HPO and MP. J Biomed Semantics. 2013;4:29.
23. Miličić Brandt M, Rath A, Devereau A, Aymé S: Mapping Orphanet Terminology to UMLS. In Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Volume 6747. Edited by Peleg M, Lavrač N, Combi C: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2011: 194-203: Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
24. Bodenreider O. Using SNOMED CT in combination with MedDRA for reporting signal detection and adverse drug reactions reporting. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009;2009:45-9.
25. Rosemblat G, Shin D, Kilicoglu H, Sneiderman C, Rindflesch TC. A methodology for extending domain coverage in SemRep. J Biomed Inform. 2013;46:1099-107.
26. Groza T, Kohler S, Moldenhauer D, Vasilevsky N, Baynam G, Zemojtel T, et al. The human phenotype ontology: semantic unification of common and rare disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;97:111-24.