On synthesis of electro-mechanical assemblies

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 1996, Pages

  Madhusudan, T N ^a   Sycara, Katia ^a   Navin Chandra, D ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; MACHINE DESIGN; MANUFACTURE; PRODUCT DESIGN;

COMPUTATIONAL FRAMEWORK; CONFIGURATION DESIGNS; ELECTRO-MECHANICAL; ELECTRO-MECHANICAL PRODUCTS; ELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS; FEED BACK INFORMATION; LEVELS OF ABSTRACTION; PARAMETRIC INFORMATION;

ASSEMBLY;

EID: 84957817417     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/96-DETC/DFM-1631     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Daniel Whitney et al. Problems and issues in design and manufacture of complex electromechanical systems. Technical Report CSDL-R-2577, Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc., 1994.
2. M.Jakiela and P.Papalambros. Design and implementation of a prototype intelligent CAD system. ASME Journal of Mechanisms, Transmission, and Automation in Design, 111(2):252-258, June 1989.
3. R.H.Sturges and M.I.Kilani. Towards an integrated design for an assembly evaluation and reasoning system. CAD, 24(2):67-79, 1992.
4. T.E. De Fazio and D.E. Whitney. Simplified generation of all mechanical assembly sequences. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 3(6):640-658, Dec. 1987.
5. Ohashi T., Miyakawa, S. and M. Iwata. The Hitachi new assemblability evaluation method. Transactions of the North American Manufacturing Research Institute, SME, 1990.
6. K.Ishii, C.F. Eubanks and D. Houser. Evaluation methodology for post manufacturing issues in lifecycle design. International Journal of Concurrent Engg;Research and Applications, 1:61-68, 1993.
7. Lee G., Hsu, W. and S.F. Su. Feedback approach to design for assembly by evaluation of assembly plan. CAD, 25(7):395-410, 1993.
8. Limage M.G., Sherrin I., Jared, G. and K. Swift. Geometric reasoning and design for manufatcure. CAD, 26(9):528-536, 1994.
9. G. Boothroyd. Product design for manufatcure and assembly. CAD, 26(9):505-520, 1994.
10. G. Pahl and W. Beitz. Engineering Design. The Design Council, Springer-Verlag, London, 1984.
11. S.Finger and J.R. Dixon. A review of research in mechanical engineering design. Research in Engineering Design, 1(1), 1989.
12. J. R. Dixon. On research methodology towards a scienti fic theory of engineering design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering, Design, Analysis and Manufacturing (AI-EDAM), 1(3), 1988.
13. D. Navin Chandra, R. Guttal, J. Koning, S. Narasimhan and Sycara, K. CADET: A case-based synthesis tool for engineering design. International Journal of Expert Systems, 4(2):157-188, 1992.
14. N. P. Suh. The Principles of Design. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1988.
15. T.Tomiyama and H.Yoshikawa. Extended general design theory. In Design Theory in Computer-Aided Design, Proceedings of the IFIP WG 5.2 Working Conference, Tokyo, pages 95-130, 1985.
16. Papalambros. P.Y. Optimal design of mechanical engineering systems. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, pages 55-62, 1995.
17. Srikanth M. Kannapan and Kurt M. Marshek. An algebraic and predicate logic approach to representation and reasoning in machine design. Mechanisms and Machine Theory, 25(3):335-353, 1990.
18. S.Kota and Chiou, S.-J. Conceptual design of mechanisms based on computational synthesis and simulation of kinematic building blo Research in Engineering Design,6(2):75-87, 1992.
19. Erdmann. A.G. Computer-aided mechanism design: Now and the future. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, pages 93-100, 1995.
20. E. Sach and L. Joskowicz. Computational kinematic analysis of higher pairs with multiple contacts. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 117(2(A)):269- 277, 1995.
21. J. Cagan and A. M. Agogino. 1stPRINCE: Innovative design from first principles. In 7th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Minneapolis, MN, August 21- 26, 1988. AAAI-88.
22. K. Sycara, S. Narasimhan, Navin Chandra, D. A transformational approach to case based synthesis. AI EDAM, 5(1):31-45, 1991.
23. K. T. Ulrich and W. P. Seering. Synthesis of schematic descriptions in mechanical design. Research in Engineering Design, 1(1), 1989.
24. A. Goel and B. Chandrasekaran. Integrating modelbased reasoning and case based reasoning for design problem solving. In AAAI-88 Design Workshop, St. Paul, MN.
25. H. M. Paynter. Analysis and Design of Engineering Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1961.
26. Margolis D.L., Rosenberg, R. and Karnopp. D. System dynamics: A unified approach. Wiley, New York, 1990.
27. J. R. Rinderle, Finger, S. A transformational approach to mechanical design using a bond graph grammer. In Proceedings of the First ASME International Design Theory and Methodology Conference, September 1989.
28. Johan Malmqvist. Computational synthesis and simulation of dynamic systems. In Design Theory and Methodology-DTM'94. ASME, 1994.
29. Jin-Kang Gui and M.Mantyla. Functional understanding of assembly modeling. CAD, 26(6):345-451, 1994.
30. T.N.Madhusudan. A bond graph based approach to case-based synthesis. CMU-RI-TR-95-29, The Robotics Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, July 1995.