Product design concept evaluation using rough sets and VIKOR method

Advanced Engineering Informatics

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 16-25

  Tiwari, Varun ^a   Jain, Prashant Kumar ^a   Tandon, Puneet ^a  

^a PDPM INDIAN INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Design concept evaluation; Interval numbers; Product design; Rough numbers; VIKOR

Indexed keywords

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; DECISION MAKING; DESIGN; SALES;

CONCEPT EVALUATION; COST AND BENEFITS; CUSTOMER EVALUATION; DESIGN CONCEPT; INTERVAL NUMBER; ROUGH NUMBERS; VIKOR; VLSEKRITERIJUMSKA OPTIMIZACIJA I KOMPROMISNO RESENJE (VIKOR);

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 84957809032     PISSN: 14740346     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2015.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. J.L. Nevins, and D. Whitney Concurrent Design of Products and Processes - A Strategy for the Next Generation in Manufacturing 1989 McGraw-Hill New York
2. B. Nepal, L. Monplaisir, and N. Singh Integrated fuzzy logic-based model for product modularization during concept development phase Int. J. Prod. Econ. 96 2 2005 157 174
3. A. Niazi, and et al. Product cost estimation: technique classification and methodology review J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Trans. ASME 128 2 2006 563 575
4. Y.L. Tu, S.Q. Xie, and R.Y.K. Fung Product development cost estimation in mass customization IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 54 1 2007 29 40
5. G. Pahl, and W. Beitz Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach 1996 Springer London, and Hong Kong
6. J. Jiao, and M.M. Tseng Fuzzy ranking for concept evaluation in configuration design for mass customization Concurrent Eng.: Res. Appl. 6 3 1998 189 206
7. L. Zhai, L. Khoo, and Z. Zhong A rough set enhanced fuzzy approach to quality function deployment Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 37 5-6 2008 613 624
8. M.K. Sayadi, M. Heydari, and K. Shahanaghi Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers Appl. Math. Model. 33 5 2009 2257 2262
9. L. Zhai, L. Khoo, and Z. Zhong Design concept evaluation in product development using rough sets and grey relation analysis Expert Syst. Appl. 36 3 2009 7072 7079
10. X. Geng, X. Chu, and Z. Zhang A new integrated design concept evaluation approach based on vague sets Expert Syst. Appl. 37 9 2010 6629 6638
11. K. Ulrich, and S. Eppinger Product Design and Development 2000 McGraw-Hill Inc
12. S. Pugh Total Design 1991 Addison-Wesley New York
13. D. Thurston A formal method for subjective design evaluation with multiple attributes Res. Eng. Design 3 2 1991 105 122
14. D. Thurston, and J. Carnahan Fuzzy ratings and utility analysis in preliminary design evaluation of multiple attributes J. Mech. Des. 114 1992 648
15. A. Alonso-Ayuso, L. Escudero, A. Garin, M. Ortuno, and G. Perez On the product selection and plant dimensioning problem under uncertainty Omega 33 4 2005 307 318
16. F. Mistree, B. Bras, W. Smith, and J. Allen Modelling design processes: a conceptual, decision-based perspective Int. J. Eng. Des. Automat. 1 4 1996 209 221
17. A.M. King, and S. Sivaloganathan Development of a methodology for concept selection in flexible design strategies J. Eng. Des. 10 4 1999 329 349
18. M. Scott, Quantifying certainty in design decisions: examining AHP, in: Proceedings of the 2002 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences (DETC2002), 2002.
19. H.Z. Huang, R.F. Bo, and W. Chen An integrated computational intelligence approach to product concept generation and evaluation Mech. Mach. Theory 41 2006 567 583
20. Z. Pawlak Rough sets Int. J. Comput. Inform. Sci. 11 5 1982 341 356
21. Z. Ayag An integrated approach to evaluating conceptual design alternatives in a new product development environment Int. J. Prod. Res. 43 4 2005 687 713
22. W. Song, X. Ming, and Z. Wu An integrated rough number-based approach to design concept evaluation under subjective environments J. Eng. Des. 24 5 2013 320 341
23. Z. Ayag, and R.G. Ozdemr An analytic network process-based approach to concept evaluation in a new product development environment J. Eng. Des. 18 3 2007 209 226
24. F.J. Carmone, A. Kara, and S.H. Zanakis A Monte Carlo investigation of incomplete pair wise comparison matrices in AHP Eur. J. Oper. Res. 102 3 1997 538 553
25. T.L. Saaty The Analytic Hierarchy Process 1980 McGraw-Hill New York
26. J.B. Yang, and P. Sen Multiple attribute design evaluation of complex engineering products using the evidential reasoning approach J. Eng. Des. 8 3 1997 211 230
27. Y.C. Jin Advanced Fuzzy Systems Design and Applications 2003 Springer
28. L.-P. Khoo, S.-B. Tor, and L.-Y. Zhai A rough-set based approach for classification and rule induction Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 15 1999 438 444
29. F. Torfi, Z.R. Farahani, and S. Rezapour Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives Appl. Soft Comput. 10 2 2009 520 528
30. S. Opricovic, Multicriteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade, 1998.
31. P.L. Yu A class of solutions for group decision problems Manage. Sci. 19 8 1973 936 946
32. M. Zeleny Multiple Criteria Decision Making 1982 Mc-Graw-Hill New York
33. S. Opricovic, and G.H. Tzeng Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, Euro J. Oper. Res. 156 2 2004 445 455
34. L.-P. Khoo, and N.C. Ho Framework of a fuzzy quality function deployment system Int. J. Prod. Res. 34 2 1996 299 311
35. L.-H. Chen, and M.-C. Weng A fuzzy model for exploiting quality function deployment Math. Comput. Model. 38 2003 559 570
36. L.-K. Chan, and M.-L. Wu A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example Omega 33 2005 119 139