Collaborating with front-line healthcare professionals: the clinical and cost effectiveness of a theory based approach to the implementation of a national guideline

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 14, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Taylor, Natalie ^a   Lawton, Rebecca ^b   Moore, Sally ^c   Craig, Joyce ^d   Slater, Beverley ^c   Cracknell, Alison ^e   Wright, John ^c   Mohammed, Mohammed A ^f  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c BRADFORD INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^e LEEDS TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Barriers; Hospitals; Interventions; Patient safety; Theoretical domains framework

Indexed keywords

COOPERATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; PATIENT SAFETY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNITED KINGDOM;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PATIENT SAFETY; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84957729511     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-014-0648-4     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Hill J, Bullock I, Alderson P: A summary of the methods that the national clinical guideline centre uses to produce clinical guidelines for the National Institute for health and clinical excellence. Ann Intern Med 2011, 154(11):752-758.
2. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L, Whitty P, Eccles MP, Matowe L, Shirran L, Wensing M, Dijkstra R, Donaldson C: Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004, 8(6):1-+.
3. Shojania KG, Grimshaw JM: Evidence-based quality improvement: the state of the science. Health Aff 2005, 24(1):138-150.
4. Hawe P. , ShiellA., RileyT., GoldL.: Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004, 58(9):788-793.
5. ∅vretveit JC, Shekelle PG, Dy SM, McDonald KM, Hempel S, Pronovost P, Rubenstein L, Taylor SL, Foy R, Wachter RM: How does context affect interventions to improve patient safety? An assessment of evidence from studies of five patient safety practices and proposals for research. BMJ Qual Safety 2011, 20(7):604-610.
6. Bosk CL, Dixon-Woods M, Goeschel CA, Pronovost PJ: Reality check for checklists. Lancet 2009, 374(9688):444-445.
7. Leistikow IP, Kalkman CJ, Bruijn H: Why patient safety is such a tough nut to crack. BMJ 2011, 343:188-190.
8. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A: Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Safety Health Care 2005, 14(1):26-33.
9. Michie S, Johnston M, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles M: From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Appl Psychol 2008, 57(4):660-680.
10. Pronovost PJ, Berenholtz SM, Needham DM: Translating evidence into practice: a model for large scale knowledge translation. BMJ 2008, 337:963-965.
11. Grol R, Wensing M: Effective Implementation: A Model. In Improving Patient Care; the Implementation of Change in Clinical Practice. Edited by Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M. Oxford: Elsevier; 2005:41-58.
12. Grol R, Bosch MC, Hulscher MEJL, Eccles MP, Wensing M: Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives. Milbank Q 2007, 85(1):93-138.
13. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O: Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q 2004, 82(4):581-629.
14. Burgers JS, Grol RPTM, Zaat JOM, Spies TH, van der Bij AK, Mokkink HGA: Characteristics of effective clinical guidelines for general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2003, 53(486):15.
15. Taylor N, Lawton R, Slater B, Foy R: The demonstration of a theory based approach to the development of localised patient safety interventions. Implementation Science 2013, 8(123). doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-123.
16. Taylor N, Parveen S, Robins V, Slater B, Lawton R: Development and initial validation of the influences on patient safety behaviours questionnaire. Implementation Science 2013, 8(81). doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-81.
17. NPSA: Patient Safety Alert: Reducing the Harm Caused by Misplaced Nasogastric Feeding Tubes. London: NHS National Patient Safety Agency; 2011. http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/alerts/?entryid45=129640.
18. Abraham C, Michie S: A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol 2008, 27(3):379.
19. Zou G: A modified Poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol 2004, 159(7):702-706.
20. NHS Institute for Innovation and Implementation: Return on Investment (ROI) calculator. Edited by Implementation NIfIa. London: NHS Institute for Innovation and Implementation; 2010. http://www.institute.nhs.uk/ quality-and-service-improvement-tools/quality-and-service- improvement-tools/Return-on-Investment-(ROI)-calculator.html.
21. Unit cost of health and social care. [http://www.pssru.ac.uk/project-pages/ unit-costs/2013/]
22. DoH: NHS Reference Costs 2012/13. Edited by DoH. London: Department of Health; 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nhsreference-costs-2012-to-2013.
23. Eveleigh M, Law R, Pullyblank A, Bennett J: Nasogastric feeding tube placement: changing culture. Nurs Times 2011, 107(41):14-16.
24. Davis DA, Taylor-Vaisey A: Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. Can Med Assoc J 1997, 157(4):408-416.
25. Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, Rutten G, Mokkink H: Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. BMJ 1998, 317(7162):858-861.
26. Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M: Improving patient care: the implementation of change in clinical practice. Edinburgh: Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann Edinburgh; 2005.
27. Published Clinical Guidelines. London. [http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ index.jsp?action=ByType&type=2&status=3&p=off]
28. Lewis R, Fletcher M: Implementing a national strategy for patient safety: lessons from the National Health Service in England. Qual Safety Health Care 2005, 14(2):135-139.
29. Perla RJ, Provost LP, Murray SK: The run chart: a simple analytical tool for learning from variation in healthcare processes. BMJ Qual Safety 2011, 20:46-51.
30. Brown C, Lilford R: Evaluating service delivery interventions to enhance patient safety. BMJ 2008, 337:a2764.
31. Brown C, Hofer T, Johal A, Thomson R, Nicholl J, Franklin BD, Lilford RJ: An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 2. Study design. Qual Safety Health Care 2008, 17(3):163-169.
32. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008, 337(sep29-1):a1655-a1655.
33. Belsky J, Melhuish E, Barnes J, Leyland AH, Romaniuk H: National evaluation of sure start research team. effects of sure start local programmes on children and families: early findings from a quasi-experimental, cross-sectional study. BMJ 2006, 332:1476-1481.
34. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P: Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 2000, 321(7262):694-696.
35. Hulscher MEJL, Laurant MGH, Grol RPTM: Process evaluation on quality improvement interventions. Qual Safety Health Care 2003, 12(1):40-46.