A model-free voting approach for integrating multiple cues

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1406, Issue , 1998, Pages 734-750

  Bräutigam, Carsten G ^a   Eklundh, Jan Olof ^a   Christensen, Henrik I ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Consensus voting; Cue integration; Grouping and segmentation; Model free

Indexed keywords

BINS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; INTEGRATION;

COMPUTER VISION SYSTEM; CONSENSUS VOTING; CUE INTEGRATION; ESTIMATION AND OPTIMIZATION; MODEL FREE; NATURAL ENVIRONMENTS; SCENE RECONSTRUCTION; SURFACE ORIENTATION;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 84957690322     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/BFb0055701     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Bengtsson, A. and Eklundh, J.-O. (1991). Shape representation by multiscale contour approximation, IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intell. 13: 85-94.
2. Bloch, I. (1996). Information combination operators for data fusion: A comparative review with classification, IEEE transactions on Systems, Man, And Cybernetics, Part A: systems and humans 26(1): 42-52.
3. Bräutigam, C., Gårding, J. and Eklundh, J.-O. (1996). Seeing the obvious, Proc. 13th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Vol. I, IEEE Computer Society Press, Vienna, Austria, pp. 67-72.
4. Bülthoff, H. and Mallot, H. (1987). Interaction of different modules in depth perception, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 295-305.
5. Burt, P. and Julesz, B. (1980). Modifications of the classical notion of panum's fusional area, Perception 9: 671-682.
6. Canny, J. (1986). A computational approach to edge detection, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence PAMI-8(6): 679-698.
7. Clark, J. and Yuille, A. (1990). Data fusion for sensory information processing systems, Kluwer, Boston, Mass.
8. Gårding, J. (1993). Shape from texture and contour by weak isotropy, J. of Artificial Intelligence 64(2): 243-297. Also ISRN KTH/NA/P-90/12-SE. Shortened version in Proc. 10th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.
9. Gårding, J. and Lindeberg, T. (1994). Direct estimation of local surface shape in a fixating binocular vision system, in J.-O. Eklundh (ed.), Proc. 3rd European Conference on Computer Vision, Vol. 800 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 365-376.
10. Gårding, J. and Lindeberg, T. (1996). Direct computation of shape cues using scale-adapted spatial derivative operators, International Journal of Computer Vision 17(2): 163-191.
11. INRIA-Syntim (1994, 1995, 1996). Stereo images.
12. *http://www-syntim.inria.fr/syntim/analyse/paires-eng.html
13. Jones, D. and Malik, J. (1992). Determining three-dimensional shape from orientation and spatial frequency disparities, in G. Sandini (ed.), Proc. 2nd European Conference on Computer Vision, Vol. 588 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 661- 669.
14. Lam, L. and Suen, C. Y. (1997). Application of majority voting to pattern recognition: An analysis of its behaviour and performance, IEEE Trans, on Systems, Man And Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans 27(5): 553-568.
15. Li, M. (1989). Hierarchical Multi-point Matching with Simultaneous Detection and Location of Breaklines, PhD thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Photogrammetry, S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.
16. Lindeberg, T. (1995). Direct estimation of affine deformations of brightness patterns using visual front-end operators with automatic scale selection, Proc. 5th International Conference on Computer Vision, Cambridge, MA, pp. 134-141.
17. Lindeberg, T. and Gårding, J. (1993). Shape from texture from a multi-scale perspective, Proc. 4th International Conference on Computer Vision, IEEE Computer Society Press, Berlin, Germany, pp. 683-691.
18. Malik, J. (1987). Interpreting line drawings of curved objects, International Journal of Computer Vision pp. 73-104.
19. Mundy, J. and Zisserman, A. (1992). Geometric Invariance in Computer Vision, MIT Press, Boston, MA.
20. Parhami, B. (1994). Voting algorithms, IEEE Transactions on reliability 43(4): 617-629.
21. Pollard, S., Mayhew, J. and Frisby, J. (1985). PMF: A stereo correspondence algorithm using a disparity gradient limit, Perception 14: 449-470.
22. Shakunaga, T. and Kaneko, H. (1988). Shape from angles under perspective projection, Proc. 2nd International Conference on Computer Vision.
23. Sugihara, K. (1986). Machine Interpretation of Line Drawings, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
24. Tyler, C. (1973). Stereoscopic vision: cortical limitations and a disparity scaling effect, Science 181: 276-278.
25. Weiss, I. (1988). Projective invariants of shape, Proc. IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vol. CVPR88, Ann Arbor, Michigan, June5-9, pp. 291-297.
26. Wildes, R. (1991). Direct recovery of three-dimensional scene geometry from binocular stereo disparity, IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intell. 13(8): 761-774.