-
1
-
-
0036190806
-
Are subjects in pharmacological treatment trials of depression representative of patients in routine clinical practice
-
Zimmerman M, Mattia JI, Posternak MA,. Are subjects in pharmacological treatment trials of depression representative of patients in routine clinical practice. Am J Psychiatry. 2002; 159: 469-473.
-
(2002)
Am J Psychiatry
, vol.159
, pp. 469-473
-
-
Zimmerman, M.1
Mattia, J.I.2
Posternak, M.A.3
-
2
-
-
79958796188
-
The generalizability of antidepressant efficacy trials to routine psychiatric out-patient practice
-
Van der Lem R, Van der Wee NJ, Van Veen T, The generalizability of antidepressant efficacy trials to routine psychiatric out-patient practice. Psychol Med. 2011; 41: 1353-1363.
-
(2011)
Psychol Med
, vol.41
, pp. 1353-1363
-
-
Van Der Lem, R.1
Van Der Wee, N.J.2
Van Veen, T.3
-
3
-
-
66149184436
-
Can phase III trial results of antidepressant medications be generalized to clinical practice? A STAR∗D report
-
Wisniewski S, Rush A, Nierenberg A, Can phase III trial results of antidepressant medications be generalized to clinical practice? A STAR∗D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2009; 166: 599-607.
-
(2009)
Am J Psychiatry
, vol.166
, pp. 599-607
-
-
Wisniewski, S.1
Rush, A.2
Nierenberg, A.3
-
4
-
-
34248585038
-
Relevance of exclusion criteria in antidepressant clinical trials: A replication study
-
Zetin M, Hoepner CT,. Relevance of exclusion criteria in antidepressant clinical trials: a replication study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007; 27: 295-301.
-
(2007)
J Clin Psychopharmacol
, vol.27
, pp. 295-301
-
-
Zetin, M.1
Hoepner, C.T.2
-
5
-
-
1342325372
-
Exclusion criteria used in antidepressant efficacy trials: Consistency across studies and representativeness of samples included
-
Zimmerman M, Chelminski I, Posternak M,. Exclusion criteria used in antidepressant efficacy trials: Consistency across studies and representativeness of samples included. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2004; 192: 87-94.
-
(2004)
J Nerv Ment Dis
, vol.192
, pp. 87-94
-
-
Zimmerman, M.1
Chelminski, I.2
Posternak, M.3
-
7
-
-
84940606619
-
Have treatment studies of depression become even less generalizable? A review of the inclusion and exclusion criteria used in placebo-controlled antidepressant efficacy trials published during the past 20 years
-
Zimmerman M, Clark HL, Multach MD, Have treatment studies of depression become even less generalizable? A review of the inclusion and exclusion criteria used in placebo-controlled antidepressant efficacy trials published during the past 20 years. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015; 90: 1180-1186.
-
(2015)
Mayo Clin Proc
, vol.90
, pp. 1180-1186
-
-
Zimmerman, M.1
Clark, H.L.2
Multach, M.D.3
-
8
-
-
73449112663
-
Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity: A patient-level meta-analysis
-
Fournier JC, DeRubeis RJ, Hollon SD, Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity: a patient-level meta-analysis. JAMA. 2010; 303: 47-53.
-
(2010)
JAMA
, vol.303
, pp. 47-53
-
-
Fournier, J.C.1
DeRubeis, R.J.2
Hollon, S.D.3
-
9
-
-
0036152658
-
Severity of depression and response to antidepressants and placebo: An analysis of the Food and Drug Administration database
-
Khan A, Leventhal RM, Khan SR, Severity of depression and response to antidepressants and placebo: an analysis of the Food and Drug Administration database. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002; 22: 40-45.
-
(2002)
J Clin Psychopharmacol
, vol.22
, pp. 40-45
-
-
Khan, A.1
Leventhal, R.M.2
Khan, S.R.3
-
10
-
-
0025269903
-
Response to treatment with antidepressants of patients with severe or moderate nonpsychotic depression and of patients with psychotic depression
-
Kocsis JH, Croughan JL, Katz MM, Response to treatment with antidepressants of patients with severe or moderate nonpsychotic depression and of patients with psychotic depression. Am J Psychiatry. 1990; 147: 621-624.
-
(1990)
Am J Psychiatry
, vol.147
, pp. 621-624
-
-
Kocsis, J.H.1
Croughan, J.L.2
Katz, M.M.3
-
11
-
-
57049188862
-
Does the probability of receiving placebo influence clinical trial outcome? A meta-regression of double-blind, randomized clinical trials in MDD
-
Papakostas G, Fava M,. Does the probability of receiving placebo influence clinical trial outcome? A meta-regression of double-blind, randomized clinical trials in MDD. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009; 19: 34-40.
-
(2009)
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol
, vol.19
, pp. 34-40
-
-
Papakostas, G.1
Fava, M.2
-
12
-
-
84857039429
-
Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants for acute major depression: Thirty-year meta-analytic review
-
Undurraga J, Baldessarini R,. Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants for acute major depression: thirty-year meta-analytic review. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012; 37: 851-864.
-
(2012)
Neuropsychopharmacol
, vol.37
, pp. 851-864
-
-
Undurraga, J.1
Baldessarini, R.2
-
13
-
-
0018425438
-
A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change
-
Montgomery SA, Asberg M,. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979; 134: 382-389.
-
(1979)
Br J Psychiatry
, vol.134
, pp. 382-389
-
-
Montgomery, S.A.1
Asberg, M.2
-
15
-
-
0034033736
-
Symptom reduction and suicide risk in patients treated with placebo in antidepressant clinical trials: An analysis of the Food and Drug Administration database
-
Kahn A, Warner H, Brown W,. Symptom reduction and suicide risk in patients treated with placebo in antidepressant clinical trials: an analysis of the Food and Drug Administration database. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000; 57: 311-317.
-
(2000)
Arch Gen Psychiatry
, vol.57
, pp. 311-317
-
-
Kahn, A.1
Warner, H.2
Brown, W.3
-
16
-
-
54949097361
-
The history and current state of antidepressant clinical trial design: A call to action for proof-of-concept studies
-
Gelenberg A, Thase M, Meyer R, The history and current state of antidepressant clinical trial design: a call to action for proof-of-concept studies. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008; 69: 1513-1528.
-
(2008)
J Clin Psychiatry
, vol.69
, pp. 1513-1528
-
-
Gelenberg, A.1
Thase, M.2
Meyer, R.3
-
17
-
-
1542290332
-
Does elimination of placebo responders in a placebo run-in increase the treatment effect in randomized clinical trials? A meta-analytic evaluation
-
Lee S, Walker JR, Jakul L, Does elimination of placebo responders in a placebo run-in increase the treatment effect in randomized clinical trials? A meta-analytic evaluation. Depress Anxiety. 2004; 19: 10-19.
-
(2004)
Depress Anxiety
, vol.19
, pp. 10-19
-
-
Lee, S.1
Walker, J.R.2
Jakul, L.3
-
18
-
-
0037266035
-
The problem of the placebo response in clinical trials for psychiatric disorders: Culprits, possible remedies, and a novel study design approach
-
Fava M, Evins AE, Dorer DJ, The problem of the placebo response in clinical trials for psychiatric disorders: culprits, possible remedies, and a novel study design approach. Psychother Psychosom. 2003; 72: 115-127.
-
(2003)
Psychother Psychosom
, vol.72
, pp. 115-127
-
-
Fava, M.1
Evins, A.E.2
Dorer, D.J.3
-
19
-
-
39849093340
-
Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: A meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration
-
Kirsch I, Deacon BJ, Huedo-Medina TB, Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration. PLoS Med. 2008; 5: e45.
-
(2008)
PLoS Med
, vol.5
, pp. e45
-
-
Kirsch, I.1
Deacon, B.J.2
Huedo-Medina, T.B.3
-
21
-
-
84882764103
-
Severity classification on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
-
Zimmerman M, Martinez JH, Young D, Severity classification on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. J Affect Disord. 2013; 150: 384-388.
-
(2013)
J Affect Disord
, vol.150
, pp. 384-388
-
-
Zimmerman, M.1
Martinez, J.H.2
Young, D.3
-
22
-
-
0036162904
-
Psychiatrists in the UK do not use outcomes measures. National survey
-
Gilbody SM, House AO, Sheldon TA,. Psychiatrists in the UK do not use outcomes measures. National survey. Br J Psychiatry. 2002; 180: 101-103.
-
(2002)
Br J Psychiatry
, vol.180
, pp. 101-103
-
-
Gilbody, S.M.1
House, A.O.2
Sheldon, T.A.3
-
23
-
-
60349120581
-
Why don't psychiatrists use scales to measure outcome when treating depressed patients?
-
Zimmerman M, McGlinchey JB,. Why don't psychiatrists use scales to measure outcome when treating depressed patients? J Clin Psychiatry. 2008; 69: 1916-1919.
-
(2008)
J Clin Psychiatry
, vol.69
, pp. 1916-1919
-
-
Zimmerman, M.1
McGlinchey, J.B.2
-
25
-
-
84961402118
-
Department of Health and Human Services
-
US Food and Drug Administration Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 In: ed. Washington, DC
-
US Food and Drug Administration Code of Federal Regulations Title 21. In: Department of Health and Human Services., ed. 21CFR20157: US Food and Drug Administration. Washington, DC; 2014.
-
(2014)
21CFR20157: US Food and Drug Administration
-
-
-
26
-
-
38349049478
-
Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy
-
Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 252-260.
-
(2008)
N Engl J Med
, vol.358
, pp. 252-260
-
-
Turner, E.H.1
Matthews, A.M.2
Linardatos, E.3
-
27
-
-
84883478692
-
Agomelatine efficacy and acceptability revisited: Systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomised trials
-
Koesters M, Guaiana G, Cipriani A, Agomelatine efficacy and acceptability revisited: systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomised trials. Br J Psychiatry. 2013; 203: 179-187.
-
(2013)
Br J Psychiatry
, vol.203
, pp. 179-187
-
-
Koesters, M.1
Guaiana, G.2
Cipriani, A.3
-
28
-
-
84897133580
-
Antidepressant efficacy of agomelatine: Meta-analysis of published and unpublished studies
-
Taylor D, Sparshatt A, Varma S, Antidepressant efficacy of agomelatine: meta-analysis of published and unpublished studies. BMJ. 2014; 348: g1888.
-
(2014)
BMJ
, vol.348
, pp. g1888
-
-
Taylor, D.1
Sparshatt, A.2
Varma, S.3
|