Sexual signalling in an artificial population: When does the handicap principle work?

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1674, Issue , 1999, Pages 644-653

  Noble, Jason ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

ARTIFICIAL POPULATION; EVOLUTIONARY SIMULATIONS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84957631145     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-48304-7_85     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Iwasa, Y., Pomiankowski, A., Nee, S.: The evolution of costly mate preferences II. The “handicap” principle. Evolution 45 (1991) 1431-1442
2. Fisher, R.A.: The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. OUP (1930)
3. Andersson, M.: Sexual Selection. Princeton Univ. Press (1994)
4. Zahavi, A.: Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. JTB 53 (1975) 205-214
5. Maynard Smith, J.: Sexual selection and the handicap principle. JTB 57 (1976) 239-242
6. Kirkpatrick, M.: The handicap mechanism of sexual selection does not function. Am. Naturalist 127 (1986) 222-240
7. Grafen, A.: Biological signals as handicaps. JTB 144 (1990) 517-546
8. Hamilton, W.D., Zuk, M.: Heritable true fitness and bright birds: A role for parasites? Science 218 (1982) 384-387
9. Hurd, P.L.: Communication in discrete action-response games. JTB 174 (1995) 217-222
10. Bullock, S.: A continuous evolutionary simulation model of the attainability of honest signalling equilibria. In Adami, C., et al., eds.: Artificial Life VI, MIT Press (1998) 339-348
11. Wiley, R.H.: Territoriality and non-random mating in sage grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). Anim. Behav. Monographs 6 (1973) 85-169
12. Bradbury, J.W., Gibson, R.M., Tsai, I.M.: Hotspots and the evolution of leks. Anim. Behav. 34 (1986) 1694-1709
13. Maynard Smith, J.: The Evolution of Sex. CUP (1978)
14. Partridge, L.: Mate choice increases a component of offspring fitness in fruit flies. Nature 283 (1980) 290-291
15. Pomiankowski, A., Møller, A.P.: A resolution of the lek paradox. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 260 (1995) 21-29
16. Werner, G.M.: Why the peacock’s tail is so short: Limits to sexual selection. In Langton, C.G., Shimohara, K., eds.: Artificial Life V, MIT Press (1996) 85-91