Developing a customizable process modelling environment: Lessons learnt and future prospects

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1487, Issue , 1998, Pages 13-27

  Koskinen, Minna ^a   Marttiin, Pentti ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^b NOKIA RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN;

DESIGN ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION OF TECHNOLOGY; FUTURE PROSPECTS; GRADUAL CHANGES; ORGANISATIONAL; PROCESS MODELLING; PROCESS MODELLING ENVIRONMENTS; PROCESS SUPPORT;

PROCESS ENGINEERING;

EID: 84957616495     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-64956-5_2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Bandinelli, S., Fuggetta, A., Ghezzi, C.: Software Process Model Evolution in the SPADE Environment. IEEE Trans, on Software Engineering. 19, 12, (1993) 1128-1144.
2. Bhandari, Ĭ., Halliday, M., Tarver, E., Brown, Ü., Chaar, J., Chíllarege. R: A Case Study of Software Process Improvement During Development. IEEE Trans, on Software Engineering, 19, 12, (1993) 1157-1169.
3. Curtis. B., Kellner, ML, Over, J.: Process modeling. Communications of the ACM, 35, 9, (1992) 75-90.
4. Dorling, A.: SPICE: Software Process Improvement and Capability dEterminatíon, Information and Software Technology, 35, 6/7, (1993) 404-406.
5. Dowson, M., Femström, C.: Towards Requirements for Enactment Mechanisms. In: Warboys, B. (ed.) Procs. of the 3rd European Workshop on Software Process Technology. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 772, Springer-Verlag (1994) 90-106.
6. Fuggetta, A.: Functionality and architecture of PSEEs. Information and Software Technology, 38, (1996) 289-293.
7. Henderson, J.C., Cooprider, J.G.: Dimensions of IS Planning and Design Aids: A Functional Model of CASE Technology. In: Allen, T., Scott-Morton, M. (eds.) IT and the Corporation of the 1990's: Research studies. Oxford University Studies Press, New York (1994) 221-248.
8. Jarke, M., Pohl, K., Rolland, C., Schmitt, J.-R.: "Experience-Based Method Evaluation and Improvement: A process modeling approach," In: Olle, T.W., Verrijn-Stuart. A.A. (eds.) Procs. of the IFIP WG8.1 Working Conference CRIS94, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1994) 1-27.
9. Kaipala, J.: Augmenting CASE Tools with Hypertext: Desired Functionality and Implementation Issues. In: Olivé, A., Pastor, J.A. (eds.) Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1250, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1997)217-230.
10. Kelly, S., Lyvtinen, K., Rossi. M.: METAEDIT+-A Fully Configurable Multi-User and Multi-Tool CASE and CAME Environment. In: Constantopoulos, P., Mylopoulos, J., Vassiliou, Y. (eds.) Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1080, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1996) 1-21.
11. Kelly, S.: Towards a Comprehensive MetaCASE and CAME Environment: Conceptual, Architectural, Functional and Usability Advances in MetaEdit+. Jyvãskylâ Studies in Computer Science, Economics and Statistics, University of Jyväskylä, PhD Thesis (1998).
12. Koskinen, M., Marttiin. P.: Process Support in MetaCASE: Implementing the Conceptual Basis for Enactable Process Models in MetaEdit+. In: Ebert, J., Lewerentz, C. (eds.) Software Engineering Environments, IEEE Computer Society Press (1997) 110-123.
13. Kumar, K., Welke, R. J.: Methodology Engineering: A Proposal for Situation-specific Methodology Engineering. In: Cotterman, W.W., Serin, J.A. (eds.) Challenges and Strategies for Research in Systems Development. Wiley, Chichester, UK (1992) 257-269.
14. Lonchamp, J.: A structured conceptual and terminological framework for software process engineering. In: Procs. of the 2nd International Conference of Software Process, IEEE Computer Society Press (1993) 41-33.
15. Lonchamp, J.: CPCE: A Kernel for Building Flexible Collaborative Process-Centered Environments, in: Verrall, M.S. (ed.) Software Engineering Environments. IEEE Computer Society Press (1995) 95-105.
16. Marttiin, P.: Towards Flexible Process Support with a CASE Shell. In: Wijers, G., Brinkkemper, S., Wasserman, T. {eds.) Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 811. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1994) 14-27.
17. Marttiin, P.: Customisable Process Modelling Support and Tools for Design Environment, Jyväskylä Studies in Computer Science, Economics and Statistics, University of Jyväskylä, PhD Thesis (1998).
18. Marttiin, P., Koskinen, M.: Similarities and Differences of Method Engineering and Process Engineering Approaches. In: Khosrowpour, M. (ed.) Effective Utilization and Management of Emerging Information Technologies, Idea Group Publishing (1998) 420-424.
19. Marttiin, P., Harmsen, F., Rossi, M,: A Functional Framework for Evaluating Method Engineering Environments: the case of Maestro II/ Decamerone and MetaEdit+, In: Brinkkemper, S., Lyytinen, K., Welke, R.J. (eds.) Method Engineering: Principles of method construction and tool support. Chapman & Hall, London (1996) 63-86.
20. Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Improving the functionality of software design environment by using hypertext, Department of Information Processing Science, Oulu University Press, Ph.D. Thesis (1997).
21. Paulk, M.C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B., Weber, C.V.: The Capability Maturity Model: Version 1.1. IEEE Software. July (1993) 18-27.
22. Perry, D.E., Staudenmayer, N.A., Votta, L.G.: People, Organizations, and Process Improvement. IEEE Software. July (1994) 36-45.
23. Phalp, K., Shepperd, M.: A Pragmatic Approach to Process Modelling. In: (Warboys, B.) Procs. of the 3rd European Workshop on Software Process Technology, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 772, Springer-Verlag (1994) 65-68.
24. Rolland, C., Souveyet, C., Moreno, M.: An Approach for Defining Ways of Working. Information Systems, 20, 4. (1995) 337-359.
25. Rossi, M.: Advanced Computer Support for Method Engineering: Implementation of CAME Environment in MetaEdit+, Jyväskylä Studies in Computer Science. Economics and Statistics, University of Jyväskylä, Ph.D. Thesis (1998).
26. Rossi, M., Sillander, T.: A Software Process Modelling Quest for Fundamental Principles. To appear in: Procs. of European Conference on Information Systems, Aix-en-Provence, France (1998).
27. Russo, N., Wynekoop, J., Waltz, D.: The use and adaptation of system development methodologies. In: Procs. of International Conference of IRMA, Atlanta, USA (1994).
28. Wijers, G., van Dort, H.: Experiences with the use of CASE tools in the Netherlands. In: Steinholz, B., Sølvberg, A., Bergman, B. (eds.) Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 436, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1990) 5-20.
29. Yourdon, E.: The Decline and Fall of the American Programmer. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey (1992).