Conflict detection and resolution in collaborative planning

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1037, Issue , 1996, Pages 111-126

  Chu Carroll, Jennifer ^a   Carberry, Sandra ^a  

^a University of Delaware   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTATION THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

COLLABORATIVE AGENTS; COLLABORATIVE NEGOTIATION; COLLABORATIVE PLANNING; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; CONFLICT DETECTION AND RESOLUTION; MODIFICATION PROCESS; PLANNING PROCESS; POTENTIAL CONFLICT;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

EID: 84957608473     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3540608052_62     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. James Allen. Discourse structure in the TRAINS project. In Darpa Speech and Natural Language Workshop, 1991.
2. Alison Cawsey, Julia Galliers, Brian Logan, Steven Reece, and Karen Sparck Jones. Revising beliefs and intentions: A unified framework for agent interaction. In The Ninth Biennial Conference of the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour, pages 130-139, 1993.
3. Jennifer Chu-Carroll and Sandra Carberry. A plan-based model for response generation in collaborative task-oriented dialogues. In Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 799-805, 1994.
4. Jennifer Chu-Carroll and Sandra Carberry. Communication for conflict resolution in multiagent collaborative planning. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multiagent Systems, pages 49-56, 1995.
5. Jennifer Chu-Carroll and Sandra Carberry. Generating information-sharing subdialogues in expert-user consultation. In Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1995.
6. Jennifer Chu-Carroll and Sandra Carberry. Response generation in collaborative negotiation. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 136-143, 1995.
7. Columbia University Transcripts. Transcripts derived from audiotape conversations made at Columbia University, New York, NY. Provided by Kathleen McKeown, 1985.
8. Susan E. Conry, Robert A. Meyer, and Victor R. Lesser. Multistage negotiation in distributed planning. In Alan H. Bond and Les Gasser, editors, Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pages 367-383. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., 1988.
9. Stephanie Elzer, Jennifer Chu-Carroll, and Sandra Carberry. Constructing and utilizing a model of user preferences in collaborative consultation dialogues. Computational Intelligence. To appear.
10. Julia R. Galliers. Autonomous belief revision and communication. In Gardenfors, editor, Belief Revision. Cambridge University Press, 1992.
11. H. Paul Grice. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, editors, Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, pages 41-58. Academic Press, Inc., New York, 1975.
12. Derek Gross, James F. Allen, and David R. Traum. The TRAINS 91 dialogues. Technical Report TN92-1, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester, 1993.
13. Barbara Grosz and Sarit Kraus. Collaborative plans for group activities. In Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1993.
14. Barbara J. Grosz and Candace L. Sidner. Plans for discourse. In Cohen, Morgan, and Pollack, editors, Intentions in Communication, chapter 20, pages 417-44. MIT Press, 1990.
15. Dale Hample. Refinements on the cognitive model of argument: Concreteness, involvement and group scores. The Western Journal of Speech Communication, 49:267-285, 1985.
16. Michael N. Huhns and David M. Bridgeland. Multiagent truth maintenance. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 21(6):1437-1445, 1991.
17. Aravind Joshi, Bonnie Webber, and Ralph M. Weischedel. Living up to expectations: Computing expert responses. In Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 169-175, 1984.
18. Aravind K. Joshi. Mutual beliefs in question-answer systems. In N.V. Smith, editor, Mutual Knowledge, chapter 4, pages 181-197. Academic Press, 1982.
19. Lynn Lambert and Sandra Carberry. A tripartite plan-based model of dialogue. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 47-54, 1991.
20. Susan E. Lander and Victor R. Lesser. Negotiated search: Cooperative search among heterogeneous expert agents. In AAAI-92 Workshop: Cooperation Among Heterogeneous Intelligent Systems, pages 74-83, 1992.
21. Brian Logan, Steven Reece, Alison Cawsey, Julia Galliers, and Karen Sparck Jones. Belief revision and dialogue management in information retrieval. Technical Report 339, University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory, 1994.
22. Joseph A. Luchok and James C. McCroskey. The effect of quality of evidence on attitude change and source credibility. The Southern Speech Communication Journal, 43:371-383, 1978.
23. B. Malheiro and E. Oliveira. Consistency and context management in a multi-agent belief revision testbed. In M. Wooldridge, J. P. Müller, and M. Tambe, editors, Intelligent Agents Volume II-Proceedings of the 1995 Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL-95), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, 1996. (In this volume).
24. Benedita Malheiro, Nicholas R. Jennings, and Eugenio Oliveira. Belief revision in multiagent systems. In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 294-298, 1994.
25. Donald D. Morley. Subjective message constructs: A theory of persuasion. Communication Monographs, 54:183-203, 1987.
26. Richard E. Petty and John T. Cacioppo. The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1):69-81, 1984.
27. Martha E. Pollack. A model of plan inference that distinguishes between the beliefs of actors and observers. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 207-214, 1986.
28. John C. Reinard. The empirical study of the persuasive effects of evidence, the status after fifty years of research. Human Communication Research, 15(1):3-59, 1988.
29. Rodney A. Reynolds and Michael Burgoon. Belief processing, reasoning, and evidence. In Bostrom, editor. Communication Yearbook 7, chapter 4, pages 83-104. Sage Publications, 1983.
30. Jeffery S. Rosenschein and Gilad Zlotkin. Rules of Encounter - Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers. MIT Press, 1994.
31. Candace L. Sidner. Using discourse to negotiate in collaborative activity: An artificial language. In AAAI-92 Workshop: Cooperation Among Heterogeneous Intelligent Systems, pages 121-128, 1992.
32. Candace L. Sidner. An artificial discourse language for collaborative negotiation. In Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 814-819, 1994.
33. SRI Transcripts. Transcripts derived from audiotape conversations made at SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, 1992. Prepared by Jacqueline Kowtko under the direction of Patti Price.
34. Katia Sycara. Argumentation: Planning other agents' plans. In Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 517-523, 1989.
35. Peter G. van Beek. A model for generating better explanations. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 215-220, Stanford, CA, 1987.
36. Marilyn A. Walker. Redundancy in collaborative dialogue. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 345-351, 1992.
37. Marilyn A. Walker. Discourse and deliberation: Testing a collaborative strategy. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 1994.
38. Michael Wooldridge and Nicholas R. Jennings. Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. Knowledge Engineering Review, 10(2), 1995.
39. Robert S. Wyer, Jr. Information redundancy, inconsistency, and novelty and their role in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6:111-127, 1970.
40. R. Michael Young, Johanna D. Moore, and Martha E. Pollack. Towards a principled representation of discourse plans. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 946-951, 1994.