Inferring selectional preferences from part-of-speech N-grams

EACL 2012 - 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 377-386

  Jang, Hyeju ^a   Mostow, Jack ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LINGUISTICS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

GRAMMATICAL RELATIONS; N-GRAMS; PART OF SPEECH; SELECTIONAL PREFERENCES; STATE OF THE ART;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84957604092     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. De Marneffe, M.-C. and Manning, C.D. 2008. Stanford Typed Dependencies Manual. http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/dependencies-manual.pdf, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
2. Erk, K. 2007. A Simple, Similarity-Based Model for Selectional Preferences. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Prague, Czech Republic, June, 2007, 216-223.
3. Erk, K., Padó, S. and Padó, U. 2010. A Flexible, Corpus-Driven Model of Regular and Inverse Selectional Preferences. Computational Linguistics 36(4), 723-763.
4. Fano, R. 1961. Transmission O F Information: A Statistical Theory of Communications. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Franz, A. and Brants, T. 2006. All Our N-Gram Are Belong to You.
6. Gale, W.A., Church, K.W. and Yarowsky, D. 1992. Work on Statistical Methods for Word Sense Disambiguation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Probabilistic Approaches to Natural Language, Cambridge, MA, October 23-25, 1992, 54-60.
7. Gildea, D. and Jurafsky, D. 2002. Automatic Labeling of Semantic Roles. Computational Linguistics 28(3), 245-288.
8. Gormley, M.R., Dredze, M., Durme, B.V. and Eisner, J. 2011. Shared Components Topic Models with Application to Selectional Preference, NIPS Workshop on Learning Semantics Sierra Nevada, Spain.
9. Im Walde, S.S., Hying, C., Scheible, C. and Schmid, H. 2008. Combining Em Training and the Mdl Principle for an Automatic Verb Classification Incorporating Selectional Preferences. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Columbus, OH, 2008, 496-504.
10. Klein, D. and Manning, C.D. 2003. Accurate Unlexicalized Parsing. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Sapporo, Japan, July 7- 12, 2003, E.W. HINRICHS and D. ROTH, Eds.
11. Petrov, S., Das, D. and McDonald, R.T. 2011. A Universal Part-of-Speech Tagset. ArXiv 1104. 2086.
12. Resnik, P. 1996. Selectional Constraints: An Information-Theoretic Model and Its Computational Realization. Cognition 61, 127-159.
13. Resnik, P. 1997. Selectional Preference and Sense Disambiguation. In ACL SIGLEX Workshop onTagging Text with Lexical Semantics: Why, What, and How, Washington, DC, April 4-5, 1997, 52-57.
14. Ritter, A. Mausam and Etzioni, O. 2010. A Latent Dirichlet Allocation Method for Selectional Preferences. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Uppsala, Sweden, 2010, 424-434.
15. Rooth, M., Riezler, S., Prescher, D., Carroll, G. and Beil, F. 1999. Inducing a Semantically Annotated Lexicon Via Em-Based Clustering. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Computational Linguistics, College Park, MD, 1999, Association for Computational Linguistics, 104-111.
16. Schutze, H. 1992. Context Space. In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Intelligent Probabilistic Approaches to Natural Language, Cambridge, MA, 1992, 113-120.
17. Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C. and Singer, Y. 2003. Feature-Rich Part-of-Speech Tagging with a Cyclic Dependency Network. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (HLT-NAACL), Edmonton, Canada, 2003, 252- 259.
18. Zhou, G., Zhao, J., Liu, K. and Cai, L. 2011. Exploiting Web-Derived Selectional Preference to Improve Statistical Dependency Parsing. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland, OR, 2011, 1556-1565.