High-throughput mapping of regulatory DNA

Nature Biotechnology

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 167-174

  Rajagopal, Nisha ^a   Srinivasan, Sharanya ^a,b   Kooshesh, Kameron ^b,c   Guo, Yuchun ^a   Edwards, Matthew D ^a   Banerjee, Budhaditya ^b   Syed, Tahin ^a   Emons, Bart J M ^b,d   Gifford, David K ^a   Sherwood, Richard I ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c Harvard University   (United States)

^d UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENES; STEM CELLS; THROUGHPUT;

DISTAL REGULATORY ELEMENTS; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; FUNCTIONAL MOTIFS; GENOMIC LOCATIONS; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; QUANTITATIVE INFORMATION; REGULATORY ELEMENTS; REGULATORY REGIONS;

GENE EXPRESSION;

GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CHROMATIN; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; DNA CLEAVAGE; DNA DETERMINATION; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; ENHANCER REGION; EPIGENETICS; FRAMESHIFT MUTATION; GENE ACTIVITY; GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE MUTATION; GENOTYPE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MOUSE; MULTIPLEXED EDITING REGULATORY ASSAY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; REGULATORY DNA SEQUENCE; REPORTER GENE; ANIMAL; CHROMOSOMAL MAPPING; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; PROCEDURES; REGULATORY SEQUENCE;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENOMICS; MICE; REGULATORY ELEMENTS, TRANSCRIPTIONAL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84957602988     PISSN: 10870156     EISSN: 15461696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3468     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Jenuwein, T., Allis, C.D. Translating the histone code. Science 293, 1074-1080 (2001).
2. Bernstein, B.E. et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125, 315-326 (2006).
3. Rada-Iglesias, A. et al. A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans. Nature 470, 279-283 (2011).
4. Heintzman, N.D. et al. Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression. Nature 459, 108-112 (2009).
5. Creyghton, M.P. et al. Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 21931-21936 (2010).
6. Melnikov, A. et al. Systematic dissection and optimization of inducible enhancers in human cells using a massively parallel reporter assay. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 271-277 (2012).
7. Arnold, C.D. et al. Genome-wide quantitative enhancer activity maps identified by STARR-seq. Science 339, 1074-1077 (2013).
8. Patwardhan, R.P. et al. Massively parallel functional dissection of mammalian enhancers in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 265-270 (2012).
9. Fullwood, M.J. et al. An oestrogen-receptor-alpha-bound human chromatin interactome. Nature 462, 58-64 (2009).
10. Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289-293 (2009).
11. Simonis, M. et al. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nat. Genet. 38, 1348-1354 (2006).
12. Dostie, J. et al. Chromosome Conformation Capture Carbon Copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. Genome Res. 16, 1299-1309 (2006).
13. Kwasnieski, J.C., Fiore, C., Chaudhari, H.G., Cohen, B.A. High-throughput functional testing of ENCODE segmentation predictions. Genome Res. 24, 1595-1602 (2014).
14. Wang, T., Wei, J.J., Sabatini, D.M., Lander, E.S. Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Science 343, 80-84 (2014).
15. Shalem, O. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Science 343, 84-87 (2014).
16. Zhou, Y. et al. High-throughput screening of a CRISPR/Cas9 library for functional genomics in human cells. Nature 509, 487-491 (2014).
17. Koike-Yusa, H., Li, Y., Tan, E.P., Velasco-Herrera, Mdel.C., Yusa, K. Genome-wide recessive genetic screening in mammalian cells with a lentiviral CRISPR-guide RNA library. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 267-273 (2014).
18. Chen, S. et al. Genome-wide CRISPR screen in a mouse model of tumor growth and metastasis. Cell 160, 1246-1260 (2015).
19. Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816-821 (2012).
20. Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819-823 (2013).
21. Mali, P. et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823-826 (2013).
22. Jinek, M. et al. RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells. eLife 2, e00471 (2013).
23. Cradick, T.J., Fine, E.J., Antico, C.J., Bao, G. CRISPR/Cas9 systems targeting ?-globin and CCR5 genes have substantial off-target activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 9584-9592 (2013).
24. Arbab, M., Srinivasan, S., Hashimoto, T., Geijsen, N., Sherwood, R.I. Cloning-free CRISPR. Stem Cell Reports 5, 908-917 (2015).
25. Young, R.A. Control of the embryonic stem cell state. Cell 144, 940-954 (2011).
26. Yue, F. et al. Mouse ENCODE Consortium. A comparative encyclopedia of DNA elements in the mouse genome. Nature 515, 355-364 (2014).
27. Rajagopal, N. et al. RFECS: a random-forest based algorithm for enhancer identification from chromatin state. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1002968 (2013).
28. ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57-74 (2012).
29. John, S. et al. Chromatin accessibility pre-determines glucocorticoid receptor binding patterns. Nat. Genet. 43, 264-268 (2011).
30. Sherwood, R.I. et al. Discovery of directional and nondirectional pioneer transcription factors by modeling DNase profile magnitude and shape. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 171-178 (2014).
31. Guo, Y., Mahony, S., Gifford, D.K. High resolution genome wide binding event finding and motif discovery reveals transcription factor spatial binding constraints. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002638 (2012).
32. Tsai, S.Q. et al. GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 187-197 (2015).
33. Leung, D. et al. Integrative analysis of haplotype-resolved epigenomes across human tissues. Nature 518, 350-354 (2015).
34. Li, G. et al. Extensive promoter-centered chromatin interactions provide a topological basis for transcription regulation. Cell 148, 84-98 (2012).
35. Woo, Y.H., Walker, M., Churchill, G.A. Coordinated expression domains in mammalian genomes. PLoS One 5, e12158 (2010).
36. Vierstra, J. et al. Functional footprinting of regulatory DNA. Nat. Methods 12, 927-930 (2015).
37. Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5-32 (2001).
38. Nelder, J.A., Wedderburn, R.W. Generalized linear models. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A 135, 370-384 (1972).
39. Kent, W.J. et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 12, 996-1006 (2002).
40. Needleman, S.B., Wunsch, C.D. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 48, 443-453 (1970).
41. Liese, F., Miescke, K.J. Statistical Decision Theory: Estimation, Testing, and Selection (Springer, 2008).
42. Dixon, J.R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376-380 (2012).