Alignment-based recognition of shape outlines

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2059, Issue , 2001, Pages 606-618

  Sebastian, Thomas B ^a   Klein, Philip N ^a   Kimia, Benjamin B ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

2D SHAPE RECOGNITION; CLASSIFICATION METHODS; DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING METHODS; INTRINSIC PROPERTY; MEASURE OF SIMILARITIES; RECOGNITION SYSTEMS; SIMILARITY MEASURE;

DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING;

EID: 84957573368     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45129-3_56     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. N. Ayache and O. Faugeras. HYPER: A new approach for the recognition and positioning of two-dimensional objects. PAMI, 8(1): 44-54, January 1986.
2. R. Basri, L. Costa, D. Geiger, and D. Jacobs. Determining the similarity of deformable shapes. Vision Research, 38: 2365-2385, 1998.
3. S. Belongie and J. Malik. Matching with shape contexts. CBAIVL, 2000.
4. I. Cohen, N. Ayache, and P. Sulger. Tracking points on deformable objects using curvature information. ECCV, pages 458-466, 1992.
5. S. Connell and A. Jain. Learning prototypes for on-line handwritten digits. ICPR, page PRP1, August 1998.
6. Y. Gdalyahu and D. Weinshall. Flexible syntactic matching of curves and its application to automatic hierarchical classification of silhouettes. PAMI, 21(12): 1312-1328, December 1999.
7. S. Gold and A. Rangarajan. A graduated assignment algorithm for graph matching. PAMI, 18(4): 377-388, 1996.
8. M. Kass, A. Witkin, and D. Terzopoulos. Snakes: Active contour models. IJCV, 1: 321-331, 1988.
9. P. Klein, T. Sebastian, and B. Kimia. Shape matching using edit-distance: an implementation. SODA, pages 781-790, 2001.
10. P. Klein, S. Tirthapura, D. Sharvit, and B. Kimia. A tree-edit distance algorithm for comparing simple, closed shapes. SODA, pages 696-704, 2000.
11. H. Liu and M. Srinath. Partial shape classification using contour matching in distance transformation. PAMI, 12(11): 1072-1079, November 1990.
12. T. Liu and D. Geiger. Approximate tree matching and shape similarity. ICCV, pages 456-462, September 1999.
13. E. Milios and E. Petrakis. Shape retrieval based on dynamic programming. Trans. Image Proc., 9(1): 141-146, 2000.
14. M. Pelillo, K. Siddiqi, and S. Zucker. Matching hierarchical structures using association graphs. PAMI, 21(11): 1105-1120, November 1999.
15. J. Schwartz and M. Sharir. Identification of partially obscured objects in two and three dimensions by matching noisy characteristic curves. Intl. J. Rob. Res., 6(2): 29-44, 1987.
16. T. Sebastian, P. Klein, and B. Kimia. Curve matching using alignment curve. Technical Report LEMS 184, LEMS, Brown University, June 2000.
17. D. Sharvit, J. Chan, H. Tek, and B. B. Kimia. Symmetry-based indexing of image databases. JVCIR, 9(4): 366-380, December 1998.
18. K. Siddiqi, A. Shokoufandeh, S. Dickinson, and S. Zucker. Shock graphs and shape matching. IJCV, 35(1): 13-32, November 1999.
19. H. Tagare, D. O’Shea, and A. Rangarajan. A geometric correspondence for shape-based non-rigid correspondence. ICCV, pages 434-439, 1995.
20. S. Umeyama. Parameterized point pattern matching and its application to recognition of object families. PAMI, 15(2): 136-144, February 1993.
21. H. Wolfson. On curve matching. PAMI, 12(5): 483-489, May 1990.
22. L. Younes. Computable elastic distance between shapes. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 58: 565-586, 1998.
23. S. C. Zhu and A. L. Yuille. FORMS: A flexible object recognition and modeling system. IJCV, 20(3), 1996.