Lesion filling effect in regional brain volume estimations: a study in multiple sclerosis patients with low lesion load

Neuroradiology

Volumn 58, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 467-474

  Pareto, D ^a   Sastre Garriga, J ^a   Aymerich, F X ^a,b   Auger, C ^a   Tintore M ^a   Montalban, X ^a   Rovira, A ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARI VALL D HEBRON   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Brain atrophy; Brain volume; Lesion segmentation; Multiple sclerosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN SIZE; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE DURATION; EXPANDED DISABILITY STATUS SCALE; FEMALE; GRAY MATTER; GREY MATTER FRACTION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; IMAGING SOFTWARE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LESION SEGMENTATION TOOLBOX; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NEUROIMAGING; NEURORADIOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VOXEL BASED MORPHOMETRY; WHITE MATTER; WHITE MATTER LESION; BRAIN; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; EVALUATION STUDY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; ORGAN SIZE; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; BRAIN; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; ORGAN SIZE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WHITE MATTER;

EID: 84957548885     PISSN: 00283940     EISSN: 14321920     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-016-1654-5     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Compston A, Coles A (2008) Multiple sclerosis. Lancet 372:1502–17
2. Lassmann H (2008) The pathologic substrate of magnetic resonance alterations in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 18(4):563–76
3. Filippi M, Rocca MA, Barkhof F, Brück W, Chen JT, Comi G et al (2012) Attendees of the correlation between pathological MRI findings in MS workshop. Association between pathological and MRI findings in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 11:349–60
4. Bermel RA, Bakshi R (2006) The measurement and clinical relevance of brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 5(2):158–70
5. Filippi M (2015) MRI measures of neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis: implications for disability, disease monitoring, and treatment. J Neurol 262(1):1–6
6. De Stefano N, Airas L, Grigoriadis N, Mattle HP, O'Riordan J, Oreja-Guevara C et al (2014) Clinical relevance of brain volume measures in multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs 28:147–56
7. Derakhshan M, Caramanos Z, Giacomini PS, Narayanan S, Maranzano J, Francis SJ, Arnold DL, Collins DL (2010) Evaluation of automated techniques for the quantification of grey matter atrophy in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 52:1261–7
8. Chard DT, Jackson JS, Miller DH, Wheeler-Kingshott CA (2010) Reducing the impact of white matter lesions on automated measures of brain gray and white matter volumes. J Magn Reson Imaging 32:223–8
9. Schmidt P, Gaser C, Arsic M, Buck D, Förschler A, Berthele A et al (2012) An automated tool for detection of FLAIR-hyperintense white-matter lesions in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 59:3774–83
10. Maldjian JA, Whitlow CT, Saha BN, Kota G, Vandergriff C, Davenport EM et al (2013) Automated white matter total lesion volume segmentation in diabetes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:2265–70
11. Ashburner J, Friston KJ (2000) Voxel-based morphometry—the methods. Neuroimage 11:805–21
12. Ashburner J (2007) A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage 38(1):95–113
13. Gelineau-Morel R, Tomassini V, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Matthews PM, Palace J (2012) The effect of hypointense white matter lesions on automated gray matter segmentation in multiple sclerosis. Hum Brain Mapp 33:2802–14