Research data sharing: Developing a stakeholder-driven model for journal policies

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 66, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 2445-2455

  Sturges, Paul ^a   Bamkin, Marianne ^b   Anders, Jane H S ^b   Hubbard, Bill ^b   Hussain, Azhar ^b   Heeley, Melanie ^b  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

collaboration; journals; resource sharing

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; JOINT INFORMATION SYSTEMS COMMITTEES; JOURNALS; QUALITATIVE DATA; QUANTITATIVE INFORMATION; RESEARCH DATA; RESOURCE SHARING;

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION;

FEASIBILITY STUDY; INFORMATION SYSTEM; JOINT; MODEL; PLANT LEAF; QUANTITATIVE STUDY;

EID: 84957536795     PISSN: 23301635     EISSN: 23301643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23336     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. ANDS (2014) About ANDS. Retrieved from http://www.ands.org.au/about-ands.html
2. Bechhofer, S., Buchan, I., De Roure, D., Missier, P., Ainsworth, J., Bhagat, J., et al. (2011). Why linked data is not enough for scientists. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29 (2), 599-611.
3. Blumenthal, D., et al. (2006). Data withholding in genetics and the other life sciences: Prevalences and predictors. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 81 (2), 137-145.
4. Campbell, E., et al. (2002). Data withholding in academic genetics: Evidence from a National Survey. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287 (4), 473-480.
5. DataCite (2013) Why Cite Data? Retrieved from http://www.datacite.org/whycitedata
6. DOI (2013) The DOI System. Retrieved from http://www.doi.org/
7. Dryad (2013). Dryad terms of service. Retrieved from http://datadryad.org/themes/Mirage/docs/TermsOfService-A4-2013.08.22.pdf
8. Fisher, J., &, Fortmann, L., (2010). Governing the data commons: Policy, practice and the advancement of science. Information and Management, 47 (4), 237-245.
9. Hodson, S., (2009). Data sharing culture has changed. Research Information, 45, 12.
10. Hrynaszkiewicz, I., &, Altman, D., (2009). Towards agreement on best practice for publishing raw clinical trial data. Trials, 10 (17), 1-5. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1745-6215-10-17.pdf
11. ICSU (International Council for Science). (2004). ICSU Report of the CSPR Assessment Panel on Scientific Data and Information. Paris: ICSU.
12. Kauppinen, T., &, Espindola, G., (2011). Linked open science-Communicating, sharing and evaluating data, methods and results for executable papers. Procedia Computer Science, 4 (2011), 726-731.
13. Kuipers, T., &, van der Hoeven, J., (2009). PARSE: Insight Into Issues of Permanent Access to the Records of Science in Europe. Survey report. Brussels: European Commission.
14. McCain, K., (1995). Mandating sharing: journal policies in the natural sciences. Science Communication, 16, 403-431.
15. National Academy of Sciences (2003). Sharing publication-related data and materials: Responsibilities of authorship in the life sciences. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10613.html
16. Neylon, C., (2009). Scientists lead the push for open data sharing. Research Information, 41 (April/May 2009), 22-23.
17. NISO (2013) NISO RP-15-3013, Recommended practices for online supplemental journal article materials. Retrieved from www.niso.org/apps/group-public/download.php/10055/RP-15-2013-Supplemental-Materials.pdf
18. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development). (2007). OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data From Public Funding. Paris: OECD.
19. Pienta, A., Alter, G., &, Lyle, J., (2010). The enduring value of social science research: the use and reuse of primary research data. In The Organisation, Economics and Policy of Scientific Research Workshop, April 2010. Torino, Italy. Retrieved from http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/78307/pienta-alter-lyle-100331.pdf?sequence=1
20. Piwowar, H., (2010). Who shares? Who doesn't? Factors associated with openly archiving raw research data. PLoS ONE, 6 (7), e18657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone0018657. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0018657
21. Piwowar, H., &, Chapman, W., (2008a). A review of journal policies for sharing research data. In Open Scholarship: Authority, Community, and Sustainability in the Age of Web 2.0-Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Electronic Publishing (ELPUB) June 25-27 2008. Toronto, Canada. Retrieved from http://elpub.architexturez.net/doc/oai-elpub.id-001-elpub2008
22. Piwowar, H., &, Chapman, W., (2008b). Identifying data sharing in biomedical literature. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2008, 596-600. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2655927/
23. Piwowar, H., &, Chapman, W., (2010a). Public sharing of research datasets: a pilot study of associations. Journal of Infometrics, 4 (2), 148-156. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157709000881
24. Piwowar, H., &, Chapman, W., (2010b). Recall and bias of retrieving gene expression microarray datasets through PubMed identifiers. Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration, 5 (2010), 7-20. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2990274/
25. Queens University (2013) Permanent links types for popular research databases. Retrieved from http://library.queensu.ca/help/permanent-links-databases
26. Reichman, J., &, Uhlir, P., (2003). A contractually reconstructed research commons for scientific data in a highly protectionist intellectual property environment. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66 (1/2), 315-462.
27. Reilly, S., Schallier, W., Schrimpf, S., Smit, E., &, Wilkinson, M., (2011) Report on integration of data and publications. Retrieved from http://www.stm-assoc.org/2011-12-5-ODE-Report-On-Integration-of-Data-and-Publications.pdf
28. Royal Society. (2012). Science as an Open Enterprise: Summary Report, June 2012. London: Royal Society. Retrieved from http://royalsociety.org/uploadedFiles/Royal-Society-Content/policy/projects/sape/2012-06-20-SAOE-Summary.pdf
29. Schriger, D., Aroa, S., &, Altman, D., (2006). The content of medical journal instructions for authors. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 48 (6), 742-749.
30. Smit, E., (2011). Abelard and Heloise: Why data and publications belong together. D-Lib Magazine, 17 (1-2), 1-8. Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january11/smit/01smit.html
31. Smit, E., &, Gruttemeier, H., (2011). Are scholarly publications ready for the data era? Suggestions for best practice guidelines and common standards for the integration of data and publications. New Review of Information Networking, 16 (1), 54-70.
32. Stodden, V., et al. (2013). Towards reproducible computational research: an empirical analysis of data and code policy adoption by journals. PLoS ONE, 8 (6), e67111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067111
33. STM (International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers) (2007) Brussels Declaration. Retrieved from http://www.stm-assoc.org/brussels-declaration/
34. Thomson Reuters (2011), Journal Citation Reports, 2011. Retrieved from http://adminapps.webofknowledge.com/JCR/JCR?SID=P13wBWytszGuKJWINir&locale=en-US
35. Vlaeminck, S., (2013). Data management in scholarly journals and possible roles for libraries-Some insights from EDaWaX. LIBER Quarterly, 23 (1), 48-79.
36. Vogeli, C., et al. (2006). Data withholding and the next generation of scientists: Results of a national survey. American Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 81 (2), 128-136. Retrieved from http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16436573