Results of the PACE follow-up study are uninterpretable

The Lancet Psychiatry

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2016, Pages e6-e7

  Coyne, James Charles ^a   Laws, Keith R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE PACING THERAPY; CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COGNITIVE THERAPY; GRADED EXERCISE THERAPY; HUMAN; KINESIOTHERAPY; LETTER; FOLLOW UP;

FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS;

EID: 84957436762     PISSN: 22150366     EISSN: 22150374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00551-9     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Sharpe M, Goldsmith KA, Johnson AL, Chalder T, Walker J, White PD Rehabilitative treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome: long-term follow-up from the PACE trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2015, 2:1067-1074.
2. Tench CM, McCurdie I, White PD, D'Cruz DP The prevalence and associations of fatigue in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology 2000, 39:1249-1254.
3. Juenger J, Schellberg D, Kraemer S, et al. Health related quality of life in patients with congestive heart failure: comparison with other chronic diseases and relation to functional variables. Heart 2002, 87:235-241.
4. Bowling A, Bond M, Jenkinson C, Lamping DL Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey questionnaire: which normative data should be used? Comparisons between the norms provided by the Omnibus Survey in Britain, the Health Survey for England and the Oxford Healthy Life Survey. J Pub Health 1999, 21:255-270.
5. Chalder T, Goldsmith KA, White PD, Sharpe M, Pickles AR Methods and outcome reporting in the PACE trial-Author's reply. Lancet Psychiatry 2015, 2:e10-e11.