Twelve recommendations for integrating existing systematic reviews into new reviews: EPC guidance

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 70, Issue , 2016, Pages 38-44

  Robinson, Karen A ^a   Chou, Roger ^b   Berkman, Nancy D ^c   Newberry, Sydne J ^d   Fu, Rongwei ^e   Hartling, Lisa ^f   Dryden, Donna ^f   Butler, Mary ^g   Foisy, Michelle ^f   Anderson, Johanna ^e   Motu'Apuaka, Makalapua ^e   Relevo, Rose ^e   Guise, Jeanne Marie ^e   Chang, Stephanie ^h  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^e Portland VA Research Foundation   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^h AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Methods guidance; Systematic reviews

Indexed keywords

CONSENSUS; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE CENTER; HUMAN; INTEGRATION; INTERVIEW; ORGANIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH SERVICE; LITERATURE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL BIAS;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CONSENSUS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84957434707     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: 18785921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.035     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. E. Whitlock, J. Lin, R. Chou, P. Shekelle, and K. Robinson Using existing systematic reviews in complex systematic reviews Ann Intern Med 148 2008 776 782
2. C.M. White, S. Ip, M. McPheeters, T.S. Carey, R. Chou, K.N. Lohr, and et al. Using existing systematic reviews to replace de novo processes in conducting comparative effectiveness reviews 2009 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville, MD
3. K.A. Robinson, E. Whitlock, M. O'Neil, J.K. Anderson, L. Hartling, D.M. Dryden, and et al. Integration of existing systematic reviews 2014 AHRQ Publication No. 14-EHC016-EF Rockville, MD
4. K.A. Robinson, E.P. Whitlock, M.E. Oneil, J.K. Anderson, L. Hartling, D.M. Dryden, and et al. Integration of existing systematic reviews into new reviews: identification of guidance needs Syst Rev 3 2014 1 17
5. K.A. Robinson, R. Chou, N.D. Berkman, S.J. Newberry, R. Fu, L. Hartling, and et al. Integrating bodies of evidence: existing systematic reviews and primary studies Rockville, MD 2015 AHRQ Publication No. 15-EHC007-EF
6. Effective Health Care Scientific Resource Center Methods article alert Available at http://www.epc-src.org/methods-library/index.cfm Accessed May, 2014
7. Filters to identify systematic reviews ISSG Search Filters Resource Available at https://sites.google.com/a/york.ac.uk/issg-search-filters-resource/filters-to-identify-systematic-reviews Accessed October, 2014
8. Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care 2009 Centre for Reviews and Dissemination York, UK
9. J. Higgins, and S. Green Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd Chichester, UK
10. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D.G. Altman Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement Ann Intern Med 151 2009 264 269
11. R. Relevo, and R. Paynter Peer review of search strategies 2012 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville, MD
12. Whiting P, Savovic J, Higgins JPT, Caldwell DM, Reeves BC, Shea B, et al. ROBIS: a new tool to assess the risk of bias in a systematic review. 22nd Cochrane Colloquium 2014.
13. N. Ahmadzai, S. Newberry, M. Maglione, A. Tsertsvadze, M.T. Ansari, S. Hempel, and et al. A surveillance system to assess the need for updating systematic reviews Syst Rev 2 2013 1 16
14. M. Chung, S. Newberry, M. Ansari, W.W. Yu, H. Wu, J. Lee, and et al. Two methods provide similar signals for the need to update systematic reviews J Clin Epidemiol 65 2012 660 668
15. P.G. Shekelle, S.J. Newberry, H. Wu, M. Suttorp, A. Motala, Y.W. Lim, and et al. Identifying signals for updating systematic reviews 2011 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville, MD
16. J.E. Cornell, C.D. Mulrow, R. Localio, C.B. Stack, A.R. Meibohm, E. Guallar, and et al. Random-effects meta-analysis of inconsistent effects: a time for change Ann Intern Med 160 2014 267 270
17. N.D. Berkman, K. Lohr, M.T. Ansari, M. McDonagh, E. Balk, E. Whitlock, and et al. Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions for the effective health care program of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: an update 2013 AHRQ Publication No. 13(14)-EHC130-EF Rockville, MD
18. R.P. Harris, M. Helfand, S.H. Woolf, K.N. Lohr, C.D. Mulrow, S.M. Teutsch, and et al. Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process Am J Prev Med 20 2001 21 35
19. A.D. Oxman Group GW Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations BMJ 328 2004 1490 1494