XBarnacle: Making theorem provers more accessible

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1249, Issue , 1997, Pages 404-407

  Lowe, Helen ^a   Duncan, David ^a,b  

^a EDINBURGH NAPIER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84957108180     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-63104-6_39     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. R.S. Boyer and J.S. Moore (1979). A Computational Logic. Academic Press, ACM monograph series.
2. A. Bundy (1988). The use of explicit plans to guide inductive proofs. In R. Lusk and R. Overbeek (eds.), 9th Conference on automated Deduction, pages 111-120. Springer-Verlag.
3. A. Bundy, F. van Harmelen, C. Horn, and A. Smaill (1990). The Oyster-CLAM system. In M.E. Stickel (ed.), 10th Conference on Automated Deduction, pages 647-648. Springer-Verlag. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence No. 449.
4. A. Bundy, F. van Harmelen, J. Hesketh, A. Smaill, and A. Stevens (1992). A rational reconstruction and extension of recursion analysis. In Sridharan, N S (ed.), Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 359-365. Morgan Kaufmann.
5. A. Ireland and A. Bundy, (1994). Productive use of failure in inductive proof. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 16.
6. D.A. Norman (1988). The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.