Cognitive task analysis in service of intelligent tutoring system design: A case study in statistics

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1452, Issue , 1998, Pages 234-243

  Lovett, Marsha C ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULA; EDUCATION COMPUTING; HIGHWAY PLANNING; JOB ANALYSIS;

COGNITIVE TASK ANALYSIS; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL REASONING; TASK ANALYSIS;

INTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIGHWAY SYSTEMS;

EID: 84957105788     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-68716-5_29     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167-207.
2. Becker, B. J. (1996). A look at the literature (and other resources) on teaching statistics. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21(1), 71-90.
3. Byrne, M., & Bovair, S. (1997). A working memory model of a common procedural error. Cognitive Science, 21, 31-61.
4. Cohen, S., Smith, G., Chechile, R. A., Burns, G. & Tsai, F. (1996). Identifying impediments to learning probability and statistics from an assessment of instructional software. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21, 35-54.
5. Durkin, J. (1994). Knowledge acquisition. In J. Durkin (Ed.) Expert systems: Design and development. (pp. 518-599). New York: Macmillan.
6. Ericcson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol Analysis (Rev.). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
7. Garfield, J. & delMas, R. (1991). Students' conceptions of probability. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Teaching Statistics, D. Vere-Jones (Ed.), Volume 1. pp. 340-349. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
8. Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1993). Reifying implicit planning in geometry: Guidelines for model-based intelligent tutoring system design. In Lajoie, S., & Derry, S. (Eds.) Computers as Cognitive Tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Lang, J., Coyne, G., & Wackerly, D. (1993). ExplorStat. Computer Program.
10. Loomis, J., & Boynton, G. (1992). Stat Visuals. Univ. of Calif. Computer program.
11. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA.
12. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. NJ: Prentice Hall.
13. Pittenger, D. J. (1995). Teaching students about graphs. Teach. of Psych. 22(2), 125-128.
14. Shute, V. J., & Gluck, K. A. (1994). Stat Lady Descriptive Statistics Tutor: Data Organization and Plotting Module. Brooks AFB, TX: Armstrong Laboratory.
15. Shute, V. J. (1995). SMART: Student Modeling Approach for Responsive Tutoring. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 5, 1-44.
16. Shute, V.J., Gawlick-Grendell, L. A., Young, R.K., and Burnham, C.A. (1995). An Experiential System for Learning Probability: Stat Lady Description and Evaluation. Instructional Science (4), 1-22.
17. Ware, M. E., & Chastain, J. D. (1991). Developing selection skills in introductory statistics. Teaching of Psychology, 18(4), 219-222.