Review: Wind impacts on plant growth, mechanics and damage

Plant Science

Volumn 245, Issue , 2016, Pages 94-118

  Gardiner, Barry ^a,b   Berry, Peter ^c   Moulia, Bruno ^d,e  

^a BORDEAUX SCIENCES AGRO   (France)

^b FOREST RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^c ADAS BOXWORTH   (United Kingdom)

^d PIAF   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

Author keywords

Dynamic loading; Ecological disturbance; Plant acclimation; Plant adaptation; Plant mechanics; Thigmomorphogenesis; Wind; Wind damage

Indexed keywords

ACCLIMATIZATION; AIR; BIOMECHANICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANT LEAF; WIND;

ACCLIMATIZATION; AIR MOVEMENTS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANT LEAVES; WIND;

EID: 84957075376     PISSN: 01689452     EISSN: 18732259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.01.006     Document Type: Review

References (184)

1. Grace J. Plant Response to Wind 1977, Academic Press, London.
2. Van Gardingen P., Grace J. Plants and wind. Advances in Botanical Research 1991, 189-253. Academic Press.
3. de Langre E. Effects of wind on plants. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2008, 40:141-168.
4. Wind and Trees 1995, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. M.P. Coutts, J. Grace (Eds.).
5. Mitchell S.J. Wind as a natural disturbance agent in forests: a synthesis. Forestry 2013, 86:147-157.
6. Physiological Plant Ecology I 1981, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. O.L. Lange, P.S. Nobel, C.B. Osmond, H. Ziegler (Eds.).
7. Mitchell C.A., Myers P.N. Mechanical stress regulation of plant growth and development. Horticultural Reviews 1995, vol. 17:1-42. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
8. Niklas K.J., Spatz H.-C. Plant Physics 2012, University of Chicago Press.
9. Vogel S. Life in Moving Fluids: The Physical Biology of Flow 1996, University Press, Princeton.
10. Moulia B., Coutand C., Julien J.L. Mechanosensitive control of plant growth: bearing the load, sensing, transducing, and responding. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6:1-20.
11. Living with Storm Damage to Forests: What Science Can Tell Us 2013, European Forest Institute, Joensuu. B. Gardiner, A. Schuck, M.-J. Schelhaas, C. Orazio, K. Blennow, B. Nicoll (Eds.).
12. Baker C.J., Sterling M., Berry P. A generalised model of crop lodging. J. Theor. Biol. 2014, 363:1-12.
13. Berry P.M., et al. Understanding and reducing lodging in cereals. Adv. Agron. 2004, 84:217-271.
14. Gibson L. The hierarchical structure and mechanics of plant materials. J. R. Soc. Interface 2012, 2749-2766.
15. Van der Hoven I. Power spectrum of horizontal wind speed in the frequency range from 0.0007 to 900 cycles per hour. J.Meteorol. 1957, 14:160-164.
16. Bichet A., Wild M., Folini D., Schär C. Causes for decadal variations of wind speed over land: Sensitivity studies with a global climate model. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2012, 39:4-9.
17. Vautard R., Cattiaux J., Yiou P., Thepaut J.-N., Ciais P. Northern Hemisphere atmospheric stilling partly attributed to an increase in surface roughness. Nat. Geosci. 2010, 3:756-761.
18. Della-Marta P.M., Mathis H., Frei C., Liniger M.A., Kleinn J. The return period of wind storms over Europe. Int. J. Clim. 2009, 459:437-459.
19. Moulia B., Coutand C., Lenne C. Posture control and skeletal mechanical acclimation in terrestrial plants: implications for mechanical modeling of plant architecture. Am. J. Bot. 2006, 93:1477-1489.
20. Hale S.E., Gardiner B.A., Wellpott A., Nicoll B.C., Achim A. Wind loading of trees: influence of tree size and competition. Eur. J. For. Res. 2012, 131:203-217.
21. Kaimal J.C., Finnigan J.J. Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows: Their Structure and Measurement 1994, Oxford University Press, New York. 1st ed.
22. Leclerc M.Y., Foken T. Footprints in Micrometeorology and Ecology 2014, Springer, Heidleberg New York Dordrecht London.
23. Jackson P.S., Hunt J.C.R. Turbulent wind flow over a low hill. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 1975, 101:929-955.
24. Finnigan J.J., Belcher S.E. Flow over a hill covered with a plant canopy. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 2004, 130:1-29.
25. Dupont S., Brunet Y., Finnigan J.J. Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow over a forested hill: validation and coherent structure identification. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 2008, 134:1911-1929.
26. Ross A.N., Baker T.P. Flow over partially forested ridges. Boundary Layer Meteorol. 2012, 146:375-392.
27. Belcher S.E., Harman I.N., Finnigan J.J. The wind in the willows: flows in forest canopies in complex terrain. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2012, 44:479-504.
28. Dupont S., Irvine M.R., Bonnefond J.M., Lamaud E., Brunet Y. Turbulent structures in a pine forest with a deep and sparse trunk space: stand and edge regions. Boundary Layer Meteorol. 2012, 143:309-336.
29. Patton E.G., Finnigan J.J. Canopy turbulence. Handbook of Environmental Fluid Dynamics 2012, 311-327. CRC. J.J.S. Fernando (Ed.).
30. Lee X. Air motion within and above forest vegetation in non-ideal conditions. For. Ecol. Manage. 2000, 135:3-18.
31. Dupont S., Brunet Y. Impact of forest edge shape on tree stability: a large-eddy simulation study. Forestry 2008, 81.
32. Dupont S., Brunet Y. Coherent structures in canopy edge flow: a large-eddy simulation study. J. Fluid Mech. 2009, 630:93.
33. Thom A.S. The exchange of momentum mass, and heat between an artificial leaf and the airflow in a wind-tunnel. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 1968, 94:44-55.
34. Thom A.S. Momentum absorption by vegetation. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 1971, 97:414-428.
35. Mayhead G.J. Some drag coefficients for British forest trees derived from wind tunnel studies. Agric. Meteorol. 1973, 123-130.
36. Rudnicki M., Mitchell S.J., Novak M.D. Wind tunnel measurements of crown streamlining and drag relationships for three conifer species. Can. J. For. Res. 2004, 34:666-676.
37. Gillies J.A., Nickling W.G., King J. Drag coefficient and plant form response to wind speed in three plant species: burning bush (Euonymus alatus), Colorado blue spruce (Picea pungens glauca.), and fountain grass (Pennisetum setaceum). J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2002, 107:1-15.
38. Telewski F.W., Jaffe M.J. Thigmomorphogenesis: field and laboratory studies of Abies fraseri in response to wind or mechanical perturbation. Physiol. Plant. 1986, 66:211-218.
39. Fournier M., Dlouhá J., Jaouen G., Almeras T. Integrative biomechanics for tree ecology: beyond wood density and strength. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64:4793-4815.
40. Moulia B., Fournier M. The power and control of gravitropic movements in plants: a biomechanical and systems biology view. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60:461-486.
41. Fournier M., Alméras T., Clair B., Gril J. Biomechanical action and biological functions. The Biology of Reaction Wood 2014, 139-169. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. B. Gardiner, J. Barnett, P. Saranpää, J. Gril (Eds.).
42. Bastien R., Bohr T., Moulia B., Douady S. Unifying model of shoot gravitropism reveals proprioception as a central feature of posture control in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110:755-760.
43. Bastien R., Douady S., Moulia B. A unified model of shoot tropism in plants: photo-, gravi- and propio-ception. Plos Comput. Biol. 2015, 11.
44. Peltola H. Mechanical stability of trees under static loads. Am. J. Bot. 2006, 93:1501-1511.
45. Coutts M.P. Components of tree stability in Sitka spruce on peaty gley soil. Forestry 1986, 59:173-197.
46. Spatz H.C., Bruechert F. Basic biomechanics of self-supporting plants: wind loads and gravitational loads on a Norway spruce tree. For. Ecol. Manage. 2000, 135:33-44.
47. Nicoll B.C., Gardiner B.A., Rayner B., Peace A.J. Anchorage of coniferous trees in relation to species soil type, and rooting depth. Can. J. For. Res. 2006, 36:1871-1883.
48. Sterling M., Baker C.J., Berry P.M., Wade A. An experimental investigation of the lodging of wheat. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2003, 119:149-165.
49. Ruel J.-C., Achim A., Herrera R.E., Cloutier A. Relating mechanical strength at the stem level to values obtained from defect-free wood samples. Trees 2010, 24:1127-1135.
50. Crook M.J., Ennos A.R. Stem and root characteristics associated with lodging resistance in four winter wheat cultivars. J. Agric. Sci. 1994, 123:167-174.
51. Sinn G., Wessoly L. A contribution to the proper assessment of the strength and stability of trees. Arboric. J. 1989, 13:45-65.
52. Raupach M.R., Finnigan J.J., Brunet Y. Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: the mixing-layer analogy. Boundary Layer Meteorol. 1996, 351-382.
53. Finnigan J., Mulhearn P. Modelling waving crops in a wind tunnel. Boundary Layer Meteorol. 1978, 14:253-277.
54. Baker C.J. The development of a theoretical model for the windthrow of plants. J. Theor. Biol. 1995, 175:355-372.
55. Py C., de Langre E., Moulia B. A frequency lock-in mechanism in the interaction between wind and crop canopies. J. Fluid Mech. 2006, 568:425-449.
56. Der Loughian C., Tadrist L., Allain J.M., Diener J., Moulia B., De Langre E. Measuring local and global vibration modes in model plants. Comptes Rendus Mec. 2014, 342:1-7.
57. Mayer H. Wind-induced tree sways. Trees 1987, 1:195-206.
58. Kerzenmacher T., Gardiner B. A mathematical model to describe the dynamic response of a spruce tree to the wind. Trees 1998, 12:385-394.
59. Doaré O., Moulia B., de Langre E. Effect of plant interaction on wind-induced crop motion. J. Biomech. Eng. 2004, 126:146-151.
60. James K.R., Haritos N., Ades P.K. Mechanical stability of trees under dynamic loads. Am. J. Bot. 2006, 93:1522-1530.
61. Rodriguez M., De Langre E., Moulia B. A scaling law for the effects of architecture and allometry on tree vibration modes suggests a biological tuning to modal compartmentalization. Am. J. Bot. 2008, 95:1523-1537.
62. Spatz H.C., Theckes B. Oscillation damping in trees. Plant Sci. 2013, 207:66-71.
63. Lopez D., Michelin S., De Langre E. Flow-induced pruning of branched systems and brittle reconfiguration. J. Theor. Biol. 2011, 284:117-124.
64. Sellier D., Brunet Y., Fourcaud T. A numerical model of tree aerodynamic response to a turbulent airflow. Forestry 2008, 81:279-297.
65. de Langre E., Gutierrez A., Cossé J. On the scaling of drag reduction by reconfiguration in plants. Comptes Rendus Mec. 2012, 340:35-40.
66. Harder D.L., Speck O., Hurd C.L., Speck T. Reconfiguration as a prerequisite for survival in highly unstable flow-dominated habitats. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2004, 23:98-107.
67. Etnier S., Vogel S. Reorientation of daffodil (Narcissus: Amaryllidaceae) flowers in wind: drag reduction and torsional flexibility. Am. J. Bot. 2000, 87:29-32.
68. Speck O. Field measurements of wind speed and reconfiguration in Arundo donax (Poaceae) with estimates of drag forces. Am. J. Bot. 2003, 90:1253-1256.
69. King D.A., Loucks O.L. The theory of tree bole and branch form. Radiat. Env. Biophys. 1978, 15:141-165.
70. Lachenbruch B., Moore J.R., Evans R. Radial variation in wood structure and function in woody plants, and hypotheses for its occurrence. Size- and Age-Related Changes in Tree Structure and Function 2011, Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht. F.C. Meinzer, B. Lachenbruch, T.E. Dawson (Eds.).
71. Telewski F.W. Wind-induced physiological and developmental responses in trees. Wind and Trees 1995, 237-263. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. M.P. Coutts, J. Grace (Eds.).
72. Niklas K. Differences between Acer saccharum leaves from open and wind-protected sites. Ann. Bot. 1996, 78:61-66.
73. Telewski F.W. Is windswept tree growth negative thigmotropism. Plant Sci. 2012, 184:20-28.
74. Milne R. Dynamics of swaying of Picea sitchensis. Tree Physiol. 1991, 9:383-399.
75. Spatz H.C., Brüchert F., Pfisterer J. Multiple resonance damping or how do trees escape dangerously large oscillations?. Am. J. Bot. 2007, 94:1603-1611.
76. Duryea M., Kampf E. Wind and Trees: Lessons Learned from Hurricanes 2007, University of Florida FOR-118, Gainesville.
77. Hedden R.L., Fredericksen T.S., Williams S.A. Modeling the effect of crown shedding and streamlining on the survival of loblolly pine exposed to acute wind. Can. J. For. Res. 1995, 25:704-712.
78. Watt M.S., Moore J.R., McKinlay B. The influence of wind on branch characteristics of Pinus radiata. Trees 2005, 19:58-65.
79. Knight T.A. Account of some experiments on the descent of sap in trees. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 1803, 96:277-289.
80. Metzger A. Der Wind als Massgebender Faktor für das Wachsthum der Bäume. Mündener Forstl. 1893, 3:35-86.
81. Jacobs M.R. The effect of wind sway on the form and development of Pinus radiata D. Don. Aust. J. Bot. 1954, 2:35-51.
82. Biddington N.L. The effects of mechanically-induced stress in plants-a review. Plant Growth Regul. 1986, 103-123.
83. Boyer N. Modifications de la croissance de la tige de Bryone (Bryonia dioica) à la suite d'irritations tactiles. C. R. Acad. Sci. 1967, 264:2114-2117.
84. Mitchell C.A. Recent advances in plant response to mechanical stress: theory and application. Hortscience 1996, 31:31-35.
85. Telewski F.W., Pruyn M.L. Thigmomorphogenesis: a dose response to flexing in Ulmus americana seedlings. Tree Physiol. 1998, 18:65-68.
86. Jaffe M.J. Thigmomorphogenesis: the response of plant growth and development to mechanical stimulation-with special reference to Bryonia dioica. Planta 1973, 114:143-157.
87. Telewski F.W. A unified hypothesis of mechanoperception in plants. Am. J. Bot. 2006, 93:1466-1476.
88. Coutand C. Mechanosensing and thigmomorphogenesis, a physiological and biomechanical point of view. Plant Sci. 2010, 179:168-182.
89. Meng S.X., Lieffers V.J., Reid D.E.B., Rudnicki M., Silins U., Jin M. Reducing stem bending increases the height growth of tall pines. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57:3175-3182.
90. Moulia B., Combes D. Thigmomorphogenetic acclimation of plants to moderate winds greatly affects height structure in field-gown alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), an indeterminate herb. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2004, 137:77.
91. Reubens B., et al. The effect of mechanical stimulation on root and shoot development of young containerised Quercus robur and Robinia pseudoacacia trees. Trees 2009, 23:1213-1228.
92. Mickovski S.B., Ennos A.R. The effect of unidirectional stem flexing on shoot and root morphology and architecture in young Pinus sylvestris trees. Can. J. For. Res. 2003, 33:2202-2209.
93. Coutand C., Dupraz C., Jaouen G., Ploquin S., Adam B. Mechanical stimuli regulate the allocation of biomass in trees: demonstration with young Prunus avium trees. Ann. Bot. 2008, 101:1421-1432.
94. Urban S.T., Lieffers V.J., Macdonald S.E. Release in radial growth in the trunk and structural roots of white spruce as measured by dendrochronology. Can. J. For. Res. 1994, 24:1550-1556.
95. Mitchell S.J. Stem growth responses in Douglas-fir and Sitka spruce following thinning: implications for assessing wind-firmness. For. Ecol. Manage. 2000, 135:105-114.
96. Badel E., Ewers F.W., Cochard H., Telewski F.W. Acclimation of mechanical and hydraulic functions in trees: impact of the thigmomorphogenetic process. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6:1-12.
97. Neel P.L., Harris R.W. Motion-induced inhibition of elongation and induction of dormancy in Liquidamber. Science 1971, 173:58-59.
98. Telewski F.W. Structure and function of flexure wood in Abies fraseri. Tree Physiol. 1989, 5:113-121.
99. Gardiner B., Barnett J., Saranpää P., Gril J. The Biology of Reaction Wood 2013, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
100. Ennos A. Wind as an ecological factor. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1997, 12:108-111.
101. Telewski F.W. Flexure wood: mechanical stress induced secondary xylem formation. Secondary Xylem Biology: Origins, Functions and Applications 2016, Elsevier, Oxford. Y.S. Kim, R. Funada, A.P. Singh (Eds.).
102. Jaffe M.J., Forbes S. Thigmomorphogenesis: the effect of mechanical perturbation on plants. Plant Growth Regul. 1993, 12:313-324.
103. Venning F.D. Simulation by wind motion of collenchyma formation in celery petioles. Bot. Gaz. 1966, 127:511-514.
104. Smith V.C., Ennos A.R. The effects of air flow and stem flexure on the mechanical and hydraulic properties of the stems of sunflowers Helianthus annuus L. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54:845-849.
105. Paul-Victor C., Rowe N. Effect of mechanical perturbation on the biomechanics, primary growth and secondary tissue development of inflorescence stems of Arabidopsis thaliana. Ann. Bot. 2011, 107:209-218.
106. Jaffe M.J., Telewski F.W., Cooke P.W. Thigmomorphogenesis: on the mechanical properties of mechanically perturbed bean plants. Physiol. Plant 1984, 62:73-78.
107. Anten N.P.R., Casado-Garcia R., Nagashima H. Effects of mechanical stress and plant density on mechanical characteristics growth, and lifetime reproduction of tobacco plants. Am. Nat. 2005, 166:650-660.
108. Pickard B., Ding J. The mechanosensory calcium-selective ion channel: key component of a plasmalemmal control centre?. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1993, 20:439.
109. Coutand C., Moulia B. Biomechanical study of the effect of a controlled bending on tomato stem elongation: local strain sensing and spatial integration of the signal. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51:1825-1842.
110. Coutand C., et al. Strain mechanosensing quantitatively controls diameter growth and PtaZFP2 gene expression in Poplar. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151:223-232.
111. Leblanc-Fournier N., et al. Jr-ZFP2 encoding a Cys2/His2-type transcription factor, is involved in the early stages of the mechano-perception pathway and specifically expressed in mechanically stimulated tissues in woody plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2008, 31:715-726.
112. Lee B.-H., Henderson D.A., Zhu J.-K. The Arabidopsis cold-responsive transcriptome and its regulation by ICE1. Plant Cell 2005, 17:3155-3175.
113. Nicoll B.C., Gardiner B.A., Peace A.J. Improvements in anchorage provided by the acclimation of forest trees to wind stress. Forestry 2008, 81:389-398.
114. Brüchert F., Gardiner B. The effect of wind exposure on the tree aerial architecture and biomechanics of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis, Pinaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2006, 93:1512-1521.
115. Grace J., Russell G. The effect of wind on grasses: III. Influence of continuous drought or wind on anatomy and water relations in Festuca arundinacea Schreb. J. Exp. Bot. 1977, 28:268-278.
116. Stokes A., Fitter A.H., Coutts M.P. Responses of young trees to wind: effects on root growth. Wind and Trees 1995, 264-275. Cambridge University Press, Edinburgh. M.P. Coutts, J. Grace (Eds.).
117. Nicoll B.C., Ray D. Adaptive growth of tree root systems in response to wind action and site conditions. Tree Physiol. 1996, 16:891-898.
118. Telewski F.W., Jaffe M.J. Thigmomorphogenesis-the role of ethylene in the response of Pinus taeda and Abies fraseri to mechanical perturbation. Physiol. Plant 1986, 66:227-233.
119. Eloy C. Leonardo's rule self-similarity, and wind-induced stresses in trees. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107.
120. Jungnikl K., Goebbels J., Burgert I., Fratzl P. The role of material properties for the mechanical adaptation at branch junctions. Trees 2009, 23:605-610.
121. Lachenbruch B., McCulloh K.A. Traits, properties, and performance: how woody plants combine hydraulic and mechanical functions in a cell tissue, or whole plant. New Phytol. 2014, 204:747-764.
122. Armbrust D.V., Retta A. Wind and sandblast damage to growing vegetation. Ann. Arid Zone 2000, 39:273-284.
123. Berry P.M., Spink J.H. A physiological analysis of oilseed rape yields: past and future. J. Agric. Sci. 2006, 144:381.
124. Kashiwagi T., Ishimaru K. Identification and functional analysis of a locus for improvement of lodging resistance in rice. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134:676-683.
125. Rajkumara S. Lodging in cereals-a review. Agric. Rev. 2008, 29:55-60.
126. Baker C., et al. A method for the assessment of the risk of wheat lodging. J. Theor. Biol. 1998, 194:587-603.
127. Crook M.J., Ennos A.R. The mechanics of root lodging in winter-wheat, Triticum aestivum L. J. Exp. Bot. 1993, 44:1219-1224.
128. Berry P.M., et al. Controlling plant form through husbandry to minimise lodging in wheat. F. Crop. Res. 2000, 67:59-81.
129. Robertson D.J., Julias M., Gardunia B.W., Barten T., Cook D.D. Corn stalk lodging: a forensic engineering approach provides insights into failure patterns and mechanisms. Crop Sci. 2015, 55:2833-2841.
130. Baylis A.D., Wright I.T.J. The effects of lodging and a paclobutrazol-chlormequat chloride mixture on the yield and quality of oilseed rape. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1990, 116:287-295.
131. Setter T.L., Laureles E.V., Mazaredo A.M. Lodging reduces yield of rice by self-shading and reductions in canopy photosynthesis. F. Crop. Res. 1997, 49:95-106.
132. Carter P.R., Hudelson K.D. Influence of simulated wind lodging on corn growth and grain yield. J. Prod. Agric. 1988, 1:295-299.
133. Berry P.M., Spink J. Predicting yield losses caused by lodging in wheat. F. Crop. Res. 2012, 137:19-26.
134. Duvick D.N. Genetic progress in yield of United States maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica 2005, 50:193-202.
135. Spink J.H., Berry P.M. Avoiding Lodging in Winter Wheat-Practical Guidelines 2005, ADAS, Stoneleigh.
136. Berry P.M., Kendall S., Rutterford Z., Orford S., Griffiths S. Historical analysis of the effects of breeding on the height of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) and consequences for lodging. Euphytica 2014.
137. Flesch T.K., Grant R.H. Corn motion in the wind during senescence: II. Effect of dynamic plant characteristics. Arboric. J. 1992, 84:748-751.
138. Nykanen M.L., Peltola H., Quine C., Kellomaki S., Broadgate M. Factors affecting snow damage of trees with particular reference to European conditions. Silva Fenn. 1997, 31:193-213.
139. Carr M.K.V. Advances in Irrigation Agronomy: Plantation Crops 2012, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
140. Jaouen G., Alméras T., Coutand C., Fournier M. How to determine sapling buckling risk with only a few measurements. Am. J. Bot. 2007, 94:1583-1593.
141. Kamimura K., Kitagawa K., Saito S., Mizunaga H. Root anchorage of hinoki (Chamaecyparis obtuse (Sieb. Et Zucc.) Endl.) under the combined loading of wind and rapidly supplied water on soil: analyses based on tree-pulling experiments. Eur. J. For. Res. 2011, 131:219-227.
142. Gardiner B., et al. A review of mechanistic modelling of wind damage risk to forests. Forestry 2008, 81:447-463.
143. O'sullivan M.F., Ritchie R.M. Tree stability in relation to cyclic loading. Forestry 1993, 66:69-82.
144. Stanturf J.A., Goodrick S.L., Outcalt K.W. Disturbance and coastal forests: a strategic approach to forest management in hurricane impact zones. For. Ecol. Manage. 2007, 250:119-135.
145. van Gardingen P.R., Grace J., Jeffree C.E. Abrasive damage by wind to the needle surfaces of Picea sitchensis (Bong) Carr and Pinus sylvestris L. Plant Cell Environ. 1991, 14:185-193.
146. Everham E.M., Brokaw N.V.L. Forest damage and recovery from catastrophic wind. Bot. Rev. 1996, 62:113-185.
147. Van Bloem S.J., Murphy P.G., Lugo A.E. A link between hurricane-induced tree sprouting, high stem density and short canopy in tropical dry forest. Tree Physiol. 2007, 27:475-480.
148. Ulanova N.G. The effects of windthrow on forests at different spatial scales: a review. For. Ecol. Manage. 2000, 135:155-167.
149. Seidl R., Blennow K. Pervasive growth reduction in Norway spruce forests following wind disturbance. PLoS One 2012, 7:e33301. 10.1371/journal.pone.0033301.
150. Schelhaas M.J., Nabuurs G.J., Schuck A. Natural disturbances in the European forests in the 19th and 20th centuries. Glob. Change Biol. 2003, 9:1620-1633.
151. Cilas C., et al. Characterization of branching in two Hevea brasiliensis clones. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55:1045-1051.
152. de P., Alvim T., Kozlowski T.T. Ecophysiology of Tropical Crops 1977, Academic Press, London. 1st ed.
153. Cutter S., et al. Hurricane Katrina and the Forgotten Coast of Mississippi 2014, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
154. Wolf A., Møller P.F., Bradshaw R.H.W., Bigler J. Storm damage and long-term mortality in a semi-natural, temperate deciduous forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 2004, 188:197-210.
155. Van Bloem S.J., Lugo A.E., Murphy P.G. Structural response of Caribbean dry forests to hurricane winds: a case study from Guánica forest, Puerto Rico. J. Biogeogr. 2006, 33:517-523.
156. Bellingham P.J., Tanner E.V.J., Healey J.R. Sprouting of trees in Jamaican montane forests, after a hurricane. J. Ecol. 1994, 82:747-758.
157. Quine C.P. Development of epicormic sprouts on Sitka spruce stems in response to windthrown gap formation. Forestry 2004, 77:225-233.
158. Negrelle R.R.B. Sprouting after uprooting of canopy trees in the Atlantic rain forest of Brazil. Biotropica. 1995, 27:448-454.
159. Hervé J., et al. The influences of forest stand management on biotic and abiotic risks of damage. Ann. For. Sci. 2009, 66:701.
160. Hale S., Gardiner B., Peace A., Nicoll B., Pizzirani S. Comparison and validation of three versions of a forest wind risk model. Environ. Model. Software 2015, 68:27-41.
161. Wallentin C., Nilsson U. Storm and snow damage in a Norway spruce thinning experiment in southern Sweden. Forestry 2013, 87:229-238.
162. Peltola H., Kellomäki S., Hassinen A., Granander M. Mechanical stability of Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch: an analysis of tree-pulling experiments in Finland. For. Ecol. Manage. 2000, 135:143-153.
163. Hanewinkel M., Kuhn T., Bugmann H., Lanz A., Brang P. Vulnerability of uneven-aged forests to storm damage. Forestry 2014, 87:525-534.
164. Schmidt M., Hanewinkel M., Kändler G., Kublin E., Kohnle U. An inventory-based approach for modeling single-tree storm damage-experiences with the winter storm of 1999 in southwestern Germany. Can. J. For. Res. 2010, 40:1636-1652.
165. Crane J., Balerdi C., Campbell R., Campbell C., Goldweber S. Managing fruit orchards to minimize hurricane damage. Horttechnology 1994, 4:21-27.
166. McAneney K.J., Judd M.J., Trought M.C.T. Wind damage to kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis Planch.) in relation to windbreak performance. New Zeal. J. Agric. Res. 1984, 27:255-263.
167. Gravina A., et al. Relation of peel damage in citrus fruit to wind climate in orchard and its control. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 129:46-51.
168. Tarara J.M., Ferguson J.C., Hoheisel G.-A., Perez Peña J.E. Asymmetrical canopy architecture due to prevailing wind direction and row orientation creates an imbalance in irradiance at the fruiting zone of grapevines. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2005, 135:144-155.
169. Carr M.K.V. Advances in Irrigation Agronomy: Fruit Crops 2014, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
170. Baker J.T. Cotton seedling abrasion and recovery from wind blown sand. Agron. J. 2007, 99:556-561.
171. Judd M., McAneney J. Shelterbelts and Kiwifruit production. Acta Hortic. 1991, 297:255-261.
172. Brandle J.R., Hintz D.L. Windbreak technology: proceedings of an international symposium on windbreak technology. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1998, 22-23:598.
173. Jim C.Y., Liu H.H.T. Storm damage on urban trees in Guangzhou, China. Landsc. Urban Plann. 1997, 38:45-59.
174. Dahle G., et al. Tree biomechanics: a white paper from the 2012 International Meeting and Research Summit at the Morton Arboretum (Lisle Illinois, U.S.). Arboric. Urban For. 2014, 40:309-318.
175. Tomlinson P.B. The uniqueness of palms. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2006, 151:5-14.
176. Ghani M.A., Stokes A., Fourcaud T. The effect of root architecture and root loss through trenching on the anchorage of tropical urban trees (Eugenia grandis Wight). Trees 2009, 23:197-209.
177. Farnsworth K., Niklas K. Theories of optimization, form and function in branching architecture in plants. Funct. Ecol. 1995, 9:355-363.
178. Niklas K.J., Spatz H.-C. Allometric theory and the mechanical stability of large trees: proof and conjecture. Am. J. Bot. 2006, 93:824-828.
179. Berry P., et al. Lodging control through variety choice and management. Agron. Intell. Basis Profitab. Prod. 2002, 1-12.
180. Quine C., Coutts M., Gardiner B., Pyatt G. Forests and Wind: Management to Minimize Damage 1995, HMSO, London.
181. Dunham R.A., Cameron A.D. Crown, stem and wood properties of wind-damaged and undamaged Sitka spruce. For. Ecol. Manage. 2000, 135:73-81.
182. Valinger E., Pettersson N. Wind and snow damage in a thinning and fertilization experiment in Picea abies in southern Sweden. Forestry 1996, 69:25-33.
183. Berry P.M., Sterling M., Baker C.J., Spink J., Sparkes D.L. A calibrated model of wheat lodging compared with field measurements. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2003, 119:167-180.
184. Gardiner B., Peltola H., Kellomäki S. Comparison of two models for predicting the critical wind speeds required to damage coniferous trees. Ecol. Modell. 2000, 129:1-23.