Use of dependency microcontexts in information retrieval

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1963, Issue , 2000, Pages 347-355

  Holub, Martin ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SEARCH ENGINES;

DOCUMENT PRE-PROCESSING; IR METHODS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NATURAL LANGUAGES; RETRIEVAL PERFORMANCE;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 84957041041     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44411-4_23     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. E. Brill, R. J. Mooney: An Overview of Empirical Natural Language Processing. In: AI Magazine, Vol. 18 (1997), No. 4.
2. M. Holub, A. Böhmová: Use of Dependency Tree Structures for the Microcontext Extraction. Accepted for the ACL’2000 conference.
3. R. Krovetz, W. B. Croft: Lexical ambiguity and information retrieval. In: ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 10(2), 1992, pp 115-141.
4. C. Leacock, G. Towell, E. M. Voorhees: Toward building contextual representations of word senses using statistical models. In: B. Boguraev and J. Pustejovsky (editors), Corpus Processing for Lexical Acquisitions, 1996, pp 97-113, MIT Press.
5. D. Lin: Extracting Collocations from Text Corpora. In: Computerm’98. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Computational Terminology. Montreal, 1998.
6. G. A. Miller, W. G. Charles: Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. In: Language and cognitive processes, 6(1), 1991.
7. H. Schütze, J. O. Pedersen: Information Retrieval Based on Word Senses. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information retrieval, pp 161-175, Las Vegas, NV, 1995.
8. G. Towell, E. M. Voorhees: Disambiguating Highly Ambiguous Words. In: Computational Linguistics, March 1998, Vol. 24, Number 1, pp 125-145.